Theoretical analysis of creative aspects of innovation professional activity and personal qualities of an innovative specialist

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2018.153377

Keywords:

innovative professional activity, creative activity, creation, creativity, innovative specialist

Abstract

In this article, on the basis of the theoretical analysis and integration of scientific approaches of various domestic and foreign authors to the definition of the essence of creative and innovative activity, as well as creation and creativity as personal qualities of the subjects of these types of activities, the features of innovative professional activity and personal characteristics of an innovative specialist are revealed. In the course of the study, a distinction was made between the concepts of “creation as an activity” and “creation as a personal quality”; determined the relationship between the categories “creation” and “creativity”, which characterize the personal qualities of stakeholders, and also developed a comparative description of creative and innovative professional activities, which made it possible to build a logical relationship between the concepts of “creative activity”, “innovative professional activity”, and “creation” and "creativity." It is shown that creation is the personal quality of a person, which allows him in the process of theoretical or practical activity to create original material or spiritual products containing signs of novelty (objective or subjective), and are valuable, at least for the subject of this activity, which, in turn, defined as creative; innovative professional activity belongs to the category of creative activity, manifested in the creative solution of specific professional tasks, aimed at creating a new (improved) product and (or) achieving a certain effect in professional activities. The subjects of innovative professional activity are innovative specialists who possess certain personal qualities, among which creativity occupies an important place. It is proved that creativity is a kind of creation that is focused and systematic, implemented in professional activities in the form of new ideas, non-standard solutions that allow solving a particular problem in an original way, applying for this intelligent tools and mechanisms of self-realization, and get the desired result in certain term. The prospect of further research is the disclosure of the essence of the personal and creative component in the structure of the future specialist's readiness for research and innovative activity

Author Biography

Viktoriia Meniailo, Zaporizhzhia National Universite Zhukovskoho str., 66, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, 69600

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Pedagogy and Psychology of Educational Activities

References

  1. Dychkivska, I. M. (20). Kreatyvnist yak skladova innovatsiynoi diyalnosti pedahoha v konteksti idei V. O. Sukhomlynskoho. Pedahohichnyi dyskurs, 10, 141–146.
  2. Klich, L. V. (2013). Experimental model of complex formation process of professional, research and innovative skills of future master students of agrarian specialties. Pedahohichni nauky, 63, 290–296.
  3. Kosheleva, N. H. (2013). Kharakterystyka modeli hotovnosti maibutnikh ekonomistiv do innovatsiynoi fakhovoi diyalnosti. Naukova skarbnytsia osvity Donechchyny, 3, 99–104.
  4. Davidov, P. G. (2010). Forming of the Creative Engineering Education in the Light of the Bolognese Process: Philosophy and Practice. Nauka. Relihiya. Suspilstvo, 1, 8–14.
  5. Kuper, L. (2014). Kreativ na 100 %. Kak razit' tvorcheskoe myshlenie? Available at: https://www.litres.ru/leks-kuper/kreativ-na-100-kak-razvit-tvorcheskoe-myshlenie/
  6. Shvay R. (2009). Creative work, creativity and innovation as important definitions of modern pedagogics. Visnyk Lviv. un-tu, 25, 74–81.
  7. Shishkina, L. I. (2015). Creativity and Creation: Value Concepts. Upravlencheskoe konsul'tirovanie, 4, 176–182.
  8. Klepalova, Yu. A. (2008). Opredelenie ponyatiy tvorchestva i kreativnosti v psihologii. Psihologicheskiy vestnik Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 254–256.
  9. Kachaj, I. S. (2016). Lingvisticheskie, praksiologicheskie, antropologicheskie i ontologicheskie osnovanija sootnoshenija ponjatij «tvorchestvo» i «kreativnost'». Filosofskaja mysl', 10, 32–49. Available at: http://e-notabene.ru/fr/article_20646.html
  10. Nel'son, R. Kreativ – iskusstvo pragmatika, ili… Kak sotvorit' prodayushchuyusya reklamnuyu ideyu. Available at: http://belreferatov.net/kreativ-iskusstvo-pragmatika-ili-kak-sotvorit-prodayushhuyu-reklamnuyu-ideyu/
  11. Halpern, D. (2000). Psihologiya kriticheskogo myshleniya. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter, 512.
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, М. (1996). Creativity. Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York.
  13. Sirotkin, L. Yu. (2015). Arts and creativity: conceptual possibilities of compromise. Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv, 3, 82–86.
  14. Kudryavcev, T. V. (1975). O razlichnyh psihologicheskih usloviyah upravleniya tvorcheskoy deyatel'nost'yu. Teoreticheskie problemy upravleniya poznavatel'noy deyatel'nost'yu cheloveka. Doklady Vsesoyuznoy konferencii: stat'i. Moscow, 47–50.
  15. Fromm, E. (1992). Dusha cheloveka. Moscow: Respublika, 429.
  16. Spirkin, A. G. (1972). Soznanie i samosoznanie. Moscow: Politizdat, 303.
  17. Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk ukrainskoi movy (2007). Kyiv: Irpin.
  18. Karpenko, V. V. (2013). Tvorchestvo i aktivnost' kak psihologicheskie fenomeny. Teoretychni i prykladni aspekty psykholohiyi, 2 (31), 140–150.
  19. Tatarkekiewicz, W. (1982). Dzieje sześciu pojęć sztuka, piękno, twórczość, odwórczość, przeźycie estetyczne. Wrocław, 438.
  20. Al'tshuller, G. S. (1979). Tvorchestvo kak tochnaya nauka. Moscow: Sovetskoe radio, 403.
  21. Maslou, A. (2011). Novye rubezhi chelovecheskoy prirody. Мoscow.
  22. Guilford, Y. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 538.
  23. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 278. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/13134-000
  24. Lyubart, T., Mushir, K., Tordzhman, S., Zenasni, F. (2009). Psihologiya kreativnosti. Moscow: Kogito-Centr, 215.
  25. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revaled by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57 (4), 421–457.
  26. Yevdokymov, V. I., Lutsenko, V. V. (2006). Kreatyvnist yak faktor humanizatsiyi osvity. Humanizm i osvita: zbirnyk materialiv VIII Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsiyi. Vinnytsia: UNIVERSUM-Vinnytsia, 49–50.
  27. Gancherenok, I. I. (2009). Creativity as an integrating tool of key competences for lifelong learning. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz, 5, 22–28.
  28. Konverskyi, A. Ye. (2015). Lohika. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 320.
  29. Florida, R. (2007). Kreativniy klass: lyudi, kotorye menyayut budushchee. Moscow: Klassika-XXI, 421.
  30. Shopina, A. V. (2009). Pedahohichna diyalnist yak tvorchyi protses. Pedahohika formuvannia tvorchoi osobystosti u vyshchiy i zahalnoosvitniy shkolakh, 54, 475–478.
  31. Uruskyi, V. I. (2005). Formuvannia hotovnosti vchyteliv do innovatsiynoi diyalnosti. Ternopil: TOKIPPO, 96.

Downloads

Published

2018-11-27

How to Cite

Meniailo, V. (2018). Theoretical analysis of creative aspects of innovation professional activity and personal qualities of an innovative specialist. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, (7 (27), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2018.153377

Issue

No. 7 (27) (2018)

Section

Pedagogical Education

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Viktoriia Meniailo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.

Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:

1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.

 2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.