Features of academic and professional training of master of laws students at universities in Great Britain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/2519-4984.2026.352750Keywords:
professional training, academic and professional training, Master of Laws, barrister, solicitor, university, Inn of Court, Great BritainAbstract
The article examines the key features of academic and professional training of Master of Laws (LL.M.) students at universities in Great Britain from historical, methodological, organizational, content-related, and procedural perspectives. It is established that the formation of the fundamental principles of legal education in Great Britain is linked to the emergence of the Anglo-Saxon legal system in the twelfth century, which was based on the activities of royal courts, legal customs, and statutes, as well as to the establishment of the first universities in Oxford and Cambridge that developed from monastic law schools. The two-tier system of legal education originated in England in the seventeenth century, when universities, upon completion of a defined educational program, awarded bachelor’s and master’s degrees, with master’s-level training being broader in content and extending over an additional three years. Alongside the study of Roman and canon law at classical universities, opportunities for the practical acquisition of English common law were provided through training at the Inns of Court. It is shown that in the nineteenth century, the division between university-based legal education, aimed at implementing the ideals of classical education, and the practical training in common law at the Inns of Court gradually lost its significance. Over time, the distinction between classical education and practical legal training became blurred, which was reflected in the development and legislative consolidation of a unified model of higher legal education. The training of legal professionals for various branches of legal services (barristers, solicitors, etc.) has undergone changes in both content and organizational structure in the context of Brexit. At present, academic and professional training of Master of Laws students in universities in the United Kingdom is implemented on the basis of student-centred and competency-based methodological approaches. From an organizational perspective, such training is characterized by its intensity; in terms of content, – by variability, interdisciplinarity, and alignment with the demands of the legal services market; and from a research perspective, – by a focus on developing analytical and research skills of Master of Laws (LL.M.) students, alongside the formation of key legal and applied competencies across various fields of law
References
- Kernoz, N., Stechenko, K. (2022). Training of lawyers in Ukraine: problems and prospects of improvement. Analytical and Comparative Jurisprudence, 3, 9–14. https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2021.03.1
- Antoshkina, V. K., Topchii, O. V. (2024). Legal education and profession in england and wales. Irpinskyi yurydychnyi chasopys, 3 (16), 19–36.
- Abel, R. L. (1988). The Legal Profession In England and Wales. Oxford; New York: Blackwel, 548. https://archive.org/details/legalprofessioni0000abel/page/n5/mode/2up
- Sutiaha, O. (2025). Practical training of master of laws students in the universities of Great Britain. Comparative Professional Pedagogy, 15 (2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.31891/2308-4081/2025-15(2)-18
- Boon, A., Webb, J.; Cownie, F. (Ed.) (2010). The legal professions as stakeholders in the academy in England and Wales. Stakeholders in the law school Oxford Hart, 65–96. Available at: https://westminsterresearch.westminster.ac.uk/item/904w6/the-legal-professions-as-stakeholders-in-the-academy-in-england-and-wales
- Lonbay, J. (2010). The Role of Practice in Legal Education in England and Wales. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1589304
- Shah, A. D. (2014). History And Development Of Legal Profession In England. Lawctopus. Available at: https://www.lawctopus.com/academike/history-development-legal-profession-england
- Syvyi, R. (2017). Preparation of Masters of Law in the United Kingdom (the Experience of Studying at the University of Dundee, Scotland). Pravo Ukrainy, 10, 82–94. Available at: https://elar.khmnu.edu.ua/items/f06a95e6-b8af-4896-8bf8-ac7edbb69c11
- Arabadzhy, N. B. (2024). Legal education and its models: a general analysis (on the example of France and Great Britain). Law and Society, 5, 77–82. https://doi.org/10.32842/2078-3736/2024.5.12
- Nahorna, O. O. (2021). Theory and Practice of the Professional Training of Masters of Laws in International Arbitration at the Universities of Great Britain. [Doctoral dissertation]. Available at: https://elar.khmnu.edu.ua/items/1997b821-4158-46cf-b098-bc65378f9260
- Proskurnyak, O. G. (2019). Contemporary Foreign Legal Education: A Historical and Legal Study (for example, USA, UK and FRG). [Doctoral dissertation]. Available at: https://lpnu.ua/spetsrady/d-3505219/proskurniak-oleg-georgiiovych
- Lisabonskyi dohovir 2007 r. Studies. Available at: https://studies.in.ua/pravo_es-shporu/2461-lsabonskiy-dogovr-2007-r.html
- Kopenhahenski kryterii 1993 roku. Available at: https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Копенгагенські_критерії
- Yakoviuk, I. V. (2016). Brexit: prychyny i naslidky brytanskoho referendumu. Yevropeiska intehratsiia v konteksti suchasnoi heopolityky. Kharkiv, 25–29. Available at: https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/SBORNIKI_2016/Evrop_integrac_24_05_2016.pdf
- Shcherbakov, V. V. (2021). Prychyny ta naslidky vykhodu Velykoi Brytanii z Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu. Yevropeiski Perspektyvy, 4, 170–175. https://doi.org/10.32782/ep.2021.4.26
- Mukha, V. V. (2022). Referendum as a Mechanism of National-State Self-Determination: the Experience of Great Britain and Ukraine. [Doctoral dissertation]. Available at: https://scc.knu.ua/upload/iblock/749/3p01t4fn56ki4uvb388vqiwik99835ey/%D0%94%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%86%D1%96%D1%8F_A_%D0%9C%D1%83%D1%85%D0%B0.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Olga Marchenko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY, which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.


