Social design of inclusive education for young people with disabilities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.3.10

Keywords:

inclusive education, social engineering, young people with disabilities, universal design for learning, resource provision, cross-sector partnerships, performance evaluation

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive scientific analysis of the problem of social planning of inclusive education for young people with disabilities in Ukraine, taking into account current global and national challenges. The purpose of the article is to provide scientific justification for the conceptual foundations and develop a framework model for social planning of inclusive education for young people with disabilities. The methodological basis of the study is a synthesis of pedagogical concepts, categories of social work, provisions of sociology of education, and social planning tools. Methods of comparative analysis, generalization of empirical and theoretical developments, and structural-functional modeling were used. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the evolution of inclusive education in Ukraine (1991–2025), which went through three stages: integration, regulatory consolidation, and crisis adaptation. This allowed us to identify patterns of gradual institutionalization of inclusion and, at the same time, demonstrated its vulnerability in crisis conditions. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the development of the “4P” model (Rights, Resources, Partnerships, Performance), which allows combining the regulatory framework, resource capacity of educational institutions, cross-sectoral interaction, and performance assessment mechanisms into a coherent system. The paper provides a detailed justification of the content of each component of the model and shows their interdependence within a single project-oriented approach. The practical significance of the results obtained lies in the creation of a conceptual basis for the modernization of university policies, the development of public administration strategies in the field of inclusion, and the activation of civil society organizations aimed at supporting young people with disabilities. The findings can be used to improve the system for monitoring and evaluating the quality of inclusive education, optimize resource provision, and implement effective partnership models that will ensure the sustainable development of inclusive practices in higher education in Ukraine.

Author Biographies

Iryna Sarancha, Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University

сandidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University

Oksana Fushtey, Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University

сandidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mykhailo Kotsiubynskyi Vinnytsia State Pedagogical University, 32 Ostrozkogo St., Vinnytsia

References

Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). (2016). General Comment No. 4 on the right to inclusive education (Article 24). United Nations. URL: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1313836.

Bilavych, H. V., Matiash, I. M., Oliinyk, T. M., & Opatskyi, I. I. (2022). Development of inclusive education in Ukraine in the context of world trends. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 75(2), 464-469. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202202131.

Дяченко, М. (2024). Інклюзивна освіта в Україні: досягнення, виклики та перспективи. Eduweb, 18(4), 27-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.04.3.

Ni, M. (2022). Social impact in design education. In Research in Design Series. Springer, 16 June 2022 (pp. 96-108). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06047-2_7.

Souleles, N. (2023). The education of the social designer: Design education and social design. In Advances in Human Factors in Training, Education, and Learning Sciences (pp. 55-65). AHFE Open Access. URL: https://ahfe.org/Content-2023/Proceedings-Open-Access.html.

Loreman, T., Delaine, B., & Lysenko, L. (2016). A Canada-Ukraine collaborative initiative for introducing inclusive education for children with disabilities. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(1), 24-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1018912.

de Beco, G. (2022). The right to “inclusive” education. The Modern Law Review, 85(6), 1302-1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12742.

Martin, S. (2024). Integrating design thinking into social work education. Social Work Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2023.2238713.

Pysarenko N., Petrukha N., Pakhomov S. (2022). Blockchain technology and its potential for supporting sustainable urban development. Law, Business & Sustainability Herald, 2(4). 31-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33844/lbsh.2022.60412.

Лопатіна, М. Ю. (2021). Сутність феномену «інклюзивна освіта». Теорія і методика професійної освіти, вип. 39. С. 179-183. [Lopatina, M. Yu. (2021). The essence of the phenomenon of “inclusive education.” Theory and Methods of Professional Education, 39, 179-183]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-6085/2021/39.36 [in Ukrainian].

Козіброда Л. В. (2019). Теоретико-понятійні аспекти інклюзивної освіти в сучасних педагогічних дослідженнях. Інноваційна педагогіка, вип. 19. Т. 3. С. 35-38. [Kozibroda, L. V. (2019). Theoretical and conceptual aspects of inclusive education in contemporary pedagogical research. Innovative Pedagogy, 19(3), Pp. 35-38]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/2663-6085-2019-19-3-7 [in Ukrainian].

Lessky, F. (2025). Educational inequality and equitable transformation: Combining Bourdieu’s relational theory and the conduct of everyday life concept to illuminate underrepresented students experiences and success in higher education. Österreich Z Soziol 50, 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-025-00611-8.

Molla, T. (2024). Educational disadvantage and policy: expanding the spaces of assessment. Journal of Educational Policy, 39(1), 105-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2023.2218322.

Popov, L., & David, G. (2019). Designing for Social Change: Articulating the Steps in the Social Design Process. Advances in Applied Sociology, 9, 516-537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2019.911038.

Dmytriieva, I., Dovhaliuk, T., Sobchuk, A., Shevchenko, O., & Biliuk, O. (2025). Innovative Approaches to the Implementation of Inclusive Education in Higher Education Institutions of Ukraine. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 4, 444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56294/mw2025444.

Diachenko, M., Voroshchuk, O., Romanova, T., Shevtsova, N., & Tretiakova, T. (2024). Inclusive education in Ukraine: Achievements, challenges, prospects. Revista Eduweb, 18(4), 35-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.04.3.

Andriichuk, N. (2024). Evolution of Disability Terminology in Ukrainian Education. In The Space of Inclusive Education (Vol. 53, pp. 35-42). Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004688131_005.

Tromp, N. (2023). Five components of social design: A unified framework to foster the common good. Design Studies, 85, 103-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2022.2088098.

Frohn, J. (2024). Modelling inclusive education: The Didactic Model for Inclusive Teaching and Learning (DIMILL). Educational Philosophy and Theory, 56(2), 240-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12741.

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Sarancha, I., & Fushtey, O. (2025). Social design of inclusive education for young people with disabilities. Social Work and Education, 12(3), 410–423. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.25.3.10

Issue

Section

RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIAL WORK