The formation of the antinomic concept of God in the philosophy and art of Christians of the II-VI centuries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2020.220082Keywords:
сhristian art, early сhristian concepts of the antinomic nature of God, mimetic-spiritual image.Abstract
Purpose of the article: to trace the evolution of the conceptual definition of God in the works of Christian philosophers II-VI centuries. and the influence of religious and philosophical thought on the evolution of the artistic image of Christ from symbolic and allegorical in early Christian art to mimetic and spiritual in the icon painting of Byzantium. The methodology consists of using analysis and comparison of written sources and artifacts, reviewed in historical sequence. Scientific novelty: for the first time, is traced a dependence of the evolution of an artistic image to the conceptual definition of God in the works of early Christian apologists. Conclusions. The formation of the image of God in Christian art of the II-VI centuries was due to the development of theological thought, which evolved from the denial of the material nature of God to the affirmation of the unity of His transcendent and immanent principles. Emphasis by Christian thinkers I – II centuries on the transcendence and “without imagery” of God denied any possibility of its depiction. The development of ideas about the presence of God in the immanent world prompted to the perception of the earthly world as a symbolic picture of otherworldly existence and opened up the possibility of the embodiment of spiritual essences in allegories and symbols that prevailed in the art of the 2nd - 3rd centuries. Comprehension of the antinomic unity of the divine and human natures of Christ became the ideological basis for creating mimetic-spiritual images, which was stimulated by a change in the status of the Christian church in the 4th century. and was entrenched by decisions IV and V - VI Ecumenical Councils.
References
Averintsev S. S. (2004). The image of Jesus Christ in the Orthodox tradition. Sophia – Logos. Dictionary. 2nd view. Kyiv: Duh i Litera, 532-548 [in Ukrainian].
Averintsev S. S. (1984). The evolution of philosophical thought. The culture of Byzantium. IV – the first half of the VII century. Moscow: Nauka,. 42 – 77 [in Russian].
Bychkov V. V. (1981). Aesthetics of Late Antiquity of the 2nd – 3rd сenturies (Ed. By M. F. Ovsyannikov). Moscow: Nauka [in Russian].
Bychkov V. V. (1984). Formation of the basic principles of Byzantine aesthetics. The culture of Byzantium. IV – the first half of the VII century. Moscow: Nauka, 504-545 [in Russian].
Bychkov V. V. (1991). On the paths of “unknowable knowledge”. To the publication of small works from Corpus Areopagiticum. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook ’90. Moscow: Nauka, 210 – 220. URL: http://abuss.narod.ru/Biblio/dionisii.htm [in Russian].
Christianity before the Nicene Council. Apologists Kodrat and Aristid. Url: https://religion.wikireading.ru/73611 [in Russian].
Irenaeus of Lyon. Against heresies. Book II. 7. 6. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Irinej_Lionskij/protiv-eresej/2_7. Book IV. 19. 1. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Irinej_Lionskij/protiv-eresej/4_19. [in Russian].
Iustin-philosopher. URL: http://www.pravenc.ru/text/1237943.html (date of appeal 10.04.2020) [in Russian].
Clement of Alexandria. Pedagog. Book I. Chapter 2. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Kliment_Aleksandrijskij/pedagog/#0_2 [in Russian].
Clement of Alexandria. Stromaty. Book Five. Chapters: ІІІ. XI; The seventh book. Chapter V. URL: https://lib.pravmir.ru/library/readbook/3549#part_57341. “The Orthodox Encyclopedia“ The ABC of Faith ”” (http: // azbyka.ru/) [in Russian].
Lazarev V. N. (1986). History of Byzantine painting. Moscow: Art, URL: https://www.iconart.info/book_contents.php?lng=en&book_id=29&chap=4&ch_l2=3 [in Russian].
Likhacheva V. D. (1981). Art of Byzantium IV – XV centuries (Edited by G.K. Wagner). Leningrad: Art, 310 p. (Essays on the history and theory of art) [in Russian].
Martyr Aristide, philosopher. Apology. URL: https://libking.ru/books/religion-/religion-rel/363151-muchenik-aristid-filosof-apologii.html (the date of appeal: April 22, 2020) [in Russian].
Origen. About the beginnings. Book 1. Translation by N. Petrov. Kazan 1899. Reprint: Riga 1936; Samara 1993; Novosibirsk 1993. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20110420132844/http://www.mystudies.narod.ru/library/o/origen/princip1.htm [in Russian].
Popova O. S. (2002). Byzantine icons of VI – XV centuries. The history of icon painting. Origins, tradition, modernity. VI – XX centuries. Moscow: Art BMB, 41 - 94. URL: http://nesusvet.narod.ru/ico/books/popova/popova1.htm#h1 [in Russian].
Rules of Ecumenical Councils. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/pravila/kanony-pravoslavnoj-tserkvi-grabbe/3_6 [in Russian].
Trubetskoy E. N. Worldview in paints. The question of the meaning of life in ancient Russian religious painting. Moscow: printing house of I. D. Sytin, 1916.44 p. URL: http://odinblago.ru/umozrenie [in Russian].
Ugrinovich D. M. (1982). Art and religion (theoretical essay). Moscow: Politizdat [in Russian].
Udaltsova, Z. V. (1988). Byzantine culture (Ed. By V.V. Gutnov). Moscow: Nauka (series "From the History of World Culture") [in Russian].
Uspensky L. A. The Theology of the Icon of the Orthodox Church. Part 2. The origin of the Christian image. URL: https://azbyka.ru/otechnik/Leonid_Uspenskij/bogoslovie-ikony-pravoslavnoj-tserkvi/1[in Russian].
Florensky P. A. (2000). Works in 4 volumes. T.3 (1). Moscow:Mysl. Series: Philosophical Heritage [in Russian].
Chalkedon Cathedral. URL: https://bit.ly/2YQSb5C [in Russian].
Downloads
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).