Devising a method for the estimation and prediction of technical condition of ship complex systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85605

Keywords:

complex technical systems, risk of failure, estimation of technical condition, prediction of technical condition, cognitive models

Abstract

In the course of devising and examining a method for the estimation and prediction of technical condition of ship CTS, operated under conditions of unpredictable extreme and technogenic impacts, we received new theoretical and practical results. A place in the hierarchy and topology of the FIIS elements of ship CTS is defined based on the characteristics of the energy, material and information resources used by the systems in the devised method for the estimation and prediction of technical condition of CTS.

The most vulnerable elements of FIIS of ship CTS are found with regard to their weight values in the systems, obtained by cognitive imitation and fuzzy simulation. The CTS elements, prone to failures, are determined by their advance detection by modeling the processes of decision making support in the search for reasons of failures. The strategy of restoring the FIIS elements of ship CTS with decision making support when searching for the reasons of their failures is based on the prediction of change in the probability of losing working ability and risk of failures of the elements. The obtained results improve reliability of ship CTS in the operation under conditions of extreme and technogenic impacts.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Vychuzhanin, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odesa, Ukraine, 65029

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Head of Department

Department of information technology

Nikolay Rudnichenko, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odesa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of information technology

Victor Boyko, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odesa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of information technology

Natalia Shibaeva, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odesa, Ukraine, 65029

Assistant

Department of Information Technology

Sergii Konovalov, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odesa, Ukraine, 65029

Postgraduate student

Department of Information Technology

References

  1. Vychuzhanin, V. V., Rudnichenko, N. D. (2014). Technical risks of complex systems are functionally interrelated structural components of ship power plants. Vestnik Odeskogo natsіonalnogo morskogo unіversitetu, 2, 68–77.
  2. ISO 13381-1: Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines - Prognostics - Part 1 (2015). General guidelines, 21.
  3. Vychuzhanin, V. V., Shibaeva, N. O. (2016). Information support remote risk assessment of complex technological systems. Сomputer science is the method in matematichnі modelyuvannі, 2, 133–141.
  4. IEC 60812: (2006). Analysis techniques for system reliability - Procedure for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), 11.
  5. Vychuzhanin, V. V., Rudnichenko, N. D. (2014). Assessment of risks structurally and functionally complex technical systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (2 (67)), 18–22. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.19846
  6. Rudnicki, V. I., Rudnicki, A., Vinogradov, V. S. (2011). Information management software reliability marine equipment. Proceedings of the R. E. Alekseeva Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, 2, 147–154.
  7. Medvedev, V. (2008). The use of forecasting and risk assessment in the design of ship power installations and their elements. Shipbuilding, 6, 159–164.
  8. Beetz, M., Buss, M., Wollherr, D. (2007). Cognitive technical systems–what is the role of artificial intelligence? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 19–42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-74565-5_3
  9. Schwenk, C. R. (1988). The cognitive perspective on strategic decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 25 (1), 41–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1988.tb00021.x
  10. Wulan, M., Petrovic, D. (2012). A fuzzy logic based system for risk analysis and evaluation within enterprise collaborations. Computers in Industry, 63 (8), 739–748. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2012.08.012
  11. Shtovba, M. D. (2007). Design of fuzzy systems MATLAB means. SPb.: Hotline – Telecom, 288.
  12. Jensen, F. V., Nielsen, T. D. (2007). Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs. Berlin: Springer, 457. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-68282-2
  13. Dorozhko, I. V., Tarasov, A. G., Baranowski, A. M. (2015). Estimation of structural reliability of complex technical systems using Bayesian belief networks models GeNIe environment. Intellectual Technologies on Transport, 3, 36–45.
  14. ISO 13379- 2 (2015). Condition monitoring and diagnostics of machines – General guidelines on data interpretation and diagnostics techniques, 21.

Downloads

Published

2016-12-26

How to Cite

Vychuzhanin, V., Rudnichenko, N., Boyko, V., Shibaeva, N., & Konovalov, S. (2016). Devising a method for the estimation and prediction of technical condition of ship complex systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(9 (84), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.85605

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system