Development of a simulation model of safety management in the projects for creating sites with mass gathering of people

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.98135

Keywords:

project management, simulation modeling, safety-oriented management, site with mass gathering of people

Abstract

The model-scheme of threats during management of projects of creating sites with mass gathering of people (SMGP) was proposed. Its feature is consideration of the main events of operating activities of the site and possible safety threats. The usage of principles of identification of the threats to the SMGP at the planning stages was proposed. An abridged structure of decomposition of operation of a site with mass gathering of people at the planning stage was developed. The classifications of complex systems in management of projects and programs in the system of civil defense were proposed. They are tree-like models of the classification objects according to various classification features. A comparative analysis of methods and algorithms as for usage of imitation modeling in projects of this type and their division into three groups were performed. As a result, in order to conduct further simulation research, we selected the method of simulation modeling. The simulation model of a life cycle of the project of creating the SMGP in the software complex AnyLogic was proposed, and based on it, a dynamic model of simulation environment of the life cycle in projects of this type was proposed. It provides an opportunity to assess the major parameters of safe operation of a site with mass gathering of people: throughput of a site, peak hours of critically permissible loading, maximum number of visitors.

Author Biographies

Oleg Zachko, Lviv State University of Life Safety Kleparivska str., 35, Lviv, Ukraine, 79007

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Project Management, Information Technologies and Telecommunications

Roman Golovatyi, Lviv State University of Life Safety Kleparivska str., 35, Lviv, Ukraine, 79007

Adjunct

Department of Project Management, Information Technologies and Telecommunications

Alona Yevdokymova, Sumy State University Rymskoho-Korsakova str., 2, Sumy, Ukraine, 40007

PhD

Department of Management

References

  1. Rach, V. A., Alatum, M. F. (2011). Strukturizatsiya shematicheskoy, sistemnoy i servisnoy modeley proekta s pozitsiy bazovyh polozheniy triadnoy paradigmy upravleniya proektami. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnitstva, 3 (39), 136–145.
  2. Johnson, N. (2007). Two's Company, Three is Complexity. Oxford: Oneword Publications, 192.
  3. Knyazeva, E. N., Kurkina, E. S. (2016). Prostranstvenno-vremennaya dinamika evolyutsionnyh protsessov v slozhnyh sistemah. Innovatsionnaya slozhnost, 185–217.
  4. Grigoryan, T. G., Kvasnevskiy, E. A., Koshkin, K. V. (2012). Primenenie kognitivnogo modelirovaniya v otsenke portfeley proektov povysheniya bezopasnosti AES. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnitstva, 2, 73–77.
  5. Chernov, S. K. (2012). Sistema riskov v organizatsionnyh proektah. Zbirnik naukovih prats Natsionalnogo universitetu korablebuduvannya, 2, 163–168.
  6. Skakun, V. O., Rak, Yu. P. (2009). Metodi ta modeli upravlinnya rizikom v proektah modernizatsiyi potentsiyno nebezpechnih ob’ektiv. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnitstva, 1 (29), 11–17. Available at: http://www.pmdp.org.ua/images/Journal/29/09svopno.pdf
  7. Fedorovich, O. E., Druzhinin, E. A., Prohorov, A. V. (2009). Informatsionnye tehnologii organizatsionnogo upravleniya slozhnymi sotsiotehnicheskimi sistemami. Khatkiv: Natsionalnyy aerokosmicheskiy universitet “Kharkovskiy aviatsionnyy institut”, 295.
  8. Latkin, M. O. (2008). Otsenka dlitelnosti i stoimosti proektov s uchetom negativnogo vozdeystviya riskov. Aviatsionnokosmicheskaya tehnika i tehnologiya, 3, 50–57.
  9. Basil, E. E., Gogunskiy, V. D., Rudenko, C. B. (2009). Kontseptsiya upravleniya tehnogennym riskom. Trudy Odesskogo politehnicheskogo universiteta, 1 (19), 218–221.
  10. Rak, Yu. P., Zachko, O. B. (2008). Metodi analizu ta otsinki rivnya bezpeki zhittediyalnosti regioniv Ukrayini v umovah realizatsiyi proektiv regionalnogo rozvitku. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnitstva, 2 (26), 29–39.
  11. Appeltant, L., Soriano, M. C., Van der Sande, G., Danckaert, J., Massar, S., Dambre, J. et. al. (2011). Information processing using a single dynamical node as complex system. Nature Communications, 2, 468. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1476
  12. Gutierrez, J. M., Sam-Martin, D., Ortin, S., Pesquera, L. (2012). Simple reservoirs with chain topology based on a single time-delay nonlinear node. InESANN, 35, 97–108.
  13. Zachko, O. B. (2013). Intellectual modeling product parameters of infrastructural project (on example of airport «Lviv»). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (61)), 92–94. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/6615/5986
  14. Lebedev, B. K., Lebedev, O. B., Lebedeva, E. M. (2016). Reshenie odnorodnoy raspredelitelnoy zadachi na osnove modeley adaptivnogo povedeniya muravinoy kolonii. Vestnik Rostovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta putey soobshcheniya, 2, 71–77.
  15. Chen, X. G. (2017). A novel reliability estimation method of complex network based on Monte Carlo. Cluster Computing. doi: 10.1007/s10586-017-0826-3
  16. Gutsul, T. V. (2016). Oglyad isnuyuchih metodiv multiagentnoyi optimizatsiyi. Mistobuduvannya ta teritorialne planuvannya, 60, 99–105.
  17. Doronkina, L. N. (2007). Upravlenie investitsionnymi riskami v stroitelstve. Moscow, 42.
  18. Minaev, V. A., Faddeev, A. O. (2008). Metodika otsenki geoekologicheskogo riska i geo- ekologicheskoy bezopasnosti landshaftno-territorialnyh kompleksov. Sistemy bezopasnosti, 96–102.
  19. Bushuev, S. D., Bushuevа, N. S. (2010). Kreativnye tehnologii upravleniya proektami i programmami. Kyiv: «Sammit-Kniga», 768.
  20. Analitichniy oglyad stanu tehnogennoyi ta prirodnoyi bezpeki v Ukrayini (2016). Derzhavna sluzhba Ukrayini z nadzvichaynih situatsyi. Available at: http://www.dsns.gov.ua/
  21. Crawford, L. (2005). Senior management perceptions of project management competence. International Journal of Project Management, 23 (1), 7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.005
  22. Malikov, R. F. (2013). Praktikum po imitatsionnomu modelirovaniyu slozhnyh sistem v srede AnyLogic 6. Ufa: Izd-vo BGPU, 296.
  23. Rak, Yu. P., Dmitrovskiy, S. Yu., Zachko, O. B., Ivanusa, A. I. (2011). Zabezpechennya umov pozhezhnoyi bezpeki pri ekspluatatsiyi sportivno-vidovishchnih sporud na kontseptualniy stadiyi zhittevogo tsiklu proektu. Pozhezhna bezpeka, 18, 51–57.
  24. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2015). Pensylvania, U.S.
  25. Zachko, O. B., Rak, Yu. P., Rak, T. E. (2008). Pidhodi do formuvannya portfelyu proektiv udoskonalennya sistemi bezpeki zhittediyalnosti. Upravlinnya proektami ta rozvitok virobnitstva, 3 (27), 54–61.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-29

How to Cite

Zachko, O., Golovatyi, R., & Yevdokymova, A. (2017). Development of a simulation model of safety management in the projects for creating sites with mass gathering of people. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3 (86), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.98135

Issue

Section

Control processes