Development of method of multifactor classification of transport and logistic processes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.128679

Keywords:

classification of transport and logistics processes, multifactor analysis, freight traffic, customs statistics, logistic analysis

Abstract

A method of classification of a set of objects and/or processes in transport and logistics systems on the basis of a multifactor analysis was proposed.

Combination of the methods of statistical and factor analysis, the systems hierarchy analysis method and modern methods of logistic analysis has enabled formation of a complex classification model. A three-stage algorithm was proposed for solving multifactor problems of classification in the fields of transport and logistics and the theory of organization of cargo transportation. At the first stage, the factor influence is investigated based on the chosen criterion. At the second stage, a comprehensive analytical indicator is created that characterizes the influence of factors on the objects under study and is based on the systemic hierarchy analysis method. The use of the hierarchy analysis method enables both use of factual data based on a thorough statistical analysis and involvement of experts in solving multifactorial decision-making problems. The use of modern logistic analysis methods in the third stage makes it possible to reasonably divide classification objects in the transport and logistics systems among various numbers of dynamic classes. At this stage, it is also possible to involve experts in the formation of boundaries of classes. The model was implemented using the Symbolic Computing Package in the Maple-7 and the Microsoft Excel environments.

Classification of Ukraine's trading partner countries by indicators of international turnover of certain groups of goods which can be transported in universal containers according to the Ukrainian foreign economic activity classifier (UFEAC) was made. Through simulation, the set of partner countries in foreign trade was divided into three classes. Classification of Ukraine’s partner countries by indicators of international turnover of certain groups of goods which can be transported in universal containers in accordance with the Ukraine’s foreign economic activity classifier (UFEAC) has allowed us to divide a set of partner countries in foreign trade into three classes. The classification results are in good agreement with the classic ABC analysis. Classification of countries by the criterion of specific value of goods flows has allowed us to divide the set of countries under study into two classes. This is explained by the fact that classification was made for a set of all partner countries in the first example and twenty countries with the largest turnover were previously selected in the second example.

Application of the proposed method of multifactor classification ensures dividing the objects of classification, in general, among different numbers of groups. At the same time, the boundaries of dynamic classes which are formed on the basis of a comprehensive assessment of the factor influence and depend on the concrete formulation of the problem and the criteria taken into account.

The proposed classification method can be used in transport, logistics, customs and brokerage enterprises, as it allows for planning and controlling supply of goods to varying degrees of detail and apply appropriate strategies.

Further development and improvement of this study is possible in the direction of using intelligent systems and algorithms to solve problems of multifactor analysis of transport and logistics systems.

Author Biographies

Arkadii Bosov, Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport named after academician V. Lazaryan Lazariana str., 2, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Applied Mathematics

Nataliya Khalipova, University of Customs and Finance Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport systems and technologies

 

Iryna Prohoniuk, University of Customs and Finance Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

Department of Transport systems and technologies

Violetta Kuzmenko, University of Customs and Finance Volodymyra Vernadskoho str., 2/4, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49000

Department of Transport systems and technologies

Viktor Duhanets, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya Shevchenka str., 13, Kamianets-Podilsky, Ukraine, 32300

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate professor

Department of tractors, automobiles and power means

Inna Shevchenko, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University Yaroslava Mudroho str., 25, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

References

  1. Bakaev, A. A., Pirozhkov, S. I., Revenko, V. L. et. al. (2003). Mezhdunarodnye transportnye koridory Ukrainy: seti i modelirovanie. Vol. 1. Kyiv: KUETT, 518.
  2. Pyrozhkov, S., Preiher, D., Maliarchuk, I. (2005). Problemy realizatsiyi tranzytnoho potentsialu Ukrainy u konteksti rozshyrennia YeS i formuvannia YeEP. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 3, 4–19.
  3. Pro zatverdzhennia Kontseptsiyi reformuvannia transportnoho sektoru ekonomiky (2000). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy, No. 1684. Available at: http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1684-2000-%D0%BF
  4. Pro skhvalennia transportnoi stratehiyi Ukrainy na period do 2020 roku (2010). Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy, No. 2174-r. Available at: http://zakon0.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2174-2010-%D1%80
  5. Khalipova, N. V. (2014). Analiz shliakhiv pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti konteinernykh perevezen v Ukraini. Visnyk Akademiyi mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriya: Tekhnichni nauky, 1, 104–115. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vamsutn_2014_1_16
  6. Khalipova, N. V., Lesnikova, I. Yu. (2014). Modeliuvannia ta analiz konteinernykh perevezen v Ukraini. Visnyk Akademiyi mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriya: Ekonomika, 1, 149–160. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vamsue_2014_1_23
  7. Kos, S., Vukić, L., Brčić, D. (2017). Comparison of External Costs in Multimodal Container Transport Chain. PROMET – Traffic&Transportation, 29 (2), 243. doi: 10.7307/ptt.v29i2.2183
  8. Liu, D., Yang, H. (2015). Joint slot allocation and dynamic pricing of container sea–rail multimodal transportation. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2 (3), 198–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jtte.2015.03.008
  9. Kengpol, A., Tuammee, S., Tuominen, M. (2014). The development of a framework for route selection in multimodal transportation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 25 (3), 581–610. doi: 10.1108/ijlm-05-2013-0064
  10. Litman, T. (2017). Introduction to multimodal transportation planning: principles and practices. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, 21. Available at: http://www.vtpi.org/multimodal_planning.pdf
  11. Khalipova, N. V. (2013). Modeliuvannia vantazhopotokiv zovnishno-ekonomichnoi diyalnosti. Visnyk Akademiyi mytnoi sluzhby Ukrainy. Seriya: Tekhnichni nauky, 2, 48–63. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/vamsutn_2013_2_9
  12. Zadorov, V. B., Fedusenko, E. V., Fedusenko, A. O. (2010). Zastosuvannia metodiv bahatokryterialnoi optymizatsiyi do planuvannia vantazhnykh perevezen. Upravlinnia rozvytkom skladnykh system, 2, 27–30.
  13. Kozina, K. H. (2014). Teoretyko-metodychni osnovy faktornoho analizu konkurentospromozhnosti mizhnarodnykh avtotransportnykh vantazhnykh perevezen Ukrainy. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Ser.: Ekonomichni nauky, 6 (2), 203–206.
  14. Novikov, A. O., Novikova, M. M. (2014). Modeling of financial and economic security of transport enterprises based on factor analysis. Science and Transport Progress. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, 6, 42–49. doi: 10.15802/stp2014/32769
  15. Chernysh, V. I. (2012). Metodyka otsinky informatsyinykh ryzykiv z vykorystanniam metodu analizu ierarkhiy. Radioelektronni i kompiuterni systemy, 1, 46–50.
  16. Danchuk, V. D., Oliinyk, R. V., Svatko, V. V. (2011). Vyznachennia efektyvnykh zasobiv vantazhnykh perevezen v transportnykh zadachakh metodom analizu ierarkhiy. Visnyk Natsionalnoho transportnoho universytetu, 22, 127–136.
  17. Nogin, V. D. (2007). Prinyatie resheniy pri mnogih kriteriyah. Sankt-Peterburg: YUTAS, 104.
  18. Stetsiuk, P. I., Berezovskyi, O. A., Zhurbenko, M. H., Kropotov, D. O. (2009). Metody nehladkoi optymizatsiyi u spetsialnykh zadachakh klasyfikatsiyi. Kyiv, 28.
  19. D'yakonov, A. G. (2014). Metody resheniya zadach klassifikacii s kategorial'nymi priznakami. Prikladnaya matematika i informatika. Trudy fakul'teta Vychislitel'noy matematiki i kibernetiki MGU imeni M. V. Lomonosova, 46, 103–127.
  20. Bureeva, N. N. (2007). Mnogomerniy statisticheskiy analiz s ispol'zovaniem PPP “STATISTICA”: Uchebno-metodicheskiy material po programme povysheniya kvalifikacii «Primenenie programmnyh sredstv v nauchnyh issledovaniyah i prepodavanii matematiki i mekhaniki». Nizhniy Novgorod, 112.
  21. Terent'ev, P. A. (2010). Klassifikacii i modeli logistiki vozvratnyh potokov. Logistika segodnya, 04 (40), 242–251.
  22. Bondarenko, I. O. (2015). Formation of estimated conditions for life cycle of deformation work of the railway track. Science and Transport Progress. Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport, 3 (57), 107–117. doi: 10.15802/stp2015/46064
  23. Butko, T. V., Prokhorchenko, A. V. (2012). Formuvannia systemy klasyfikatsiyi zaliznychnykh dilnyts i napriamkiv za vydamy perevezen i katehoriyamy infrastruktury dlia ekspluatatsiynoi diyalnosti. Visnyk ekonomiky transportu i promyslovosti, 38, 68–69.
  24. Prokip, A. V., Dudiuk, V. S., Kolisnyk, R. B.; Prokip, A. V. (Ed.) (2015). Orhanizatsiyni ta ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady vykorystannia vidnovliuvalnykh enerhoresursiv. Lviv: ZUKTs, 332.
  25. Brenych, Ya. V., Tymoshchuk, P. V. (2012). Neiromerezhevi metody rozviazannia zadachi klasyfikatsiyi. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 22.13, 343–349.
  26. Qiong, L., Jie, Y., Jinfang, Z. (2011). Application of Clustering Algorithm in Intelligent Transportation Data Analysis. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 467–473. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24097-3_70
  27. Lei, K., Zhu, X., Hou, J., Huang, W. (2014). Decision of Multimodal Transportation Scheme Based on Swarm Intelligence. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014, 1–10. doi: 10.1155/2014/932832
  28. Ramadhani, T., Hertono, G. F., Handari, B. D. (2017). An Ant Colony Optimization algorithm for solving the fixed destination multi-depot multiple traveling salesman problem with non-random parameters. AIP Conference Proceedings. doi: 10.1063/1.4991227
  29. Xu, Q., Mao, J., Jin, Z. (2012). Simulated Annealing-Based Ant Colony Algorithm for Tugboat Scheduling Optimization. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2012, 1–22. doi: 10.1155/2012/246978
  30. Paklin, N. M. Algoritmy klasterizacii na sluzhbe Data Mining. BaseGroup Labs. Tekhnologii analiza dannyh. Available at: https://basegroup.ru/community/articles/datamining
  31. Afifi, A., Eyzen, S. (1982). Statisticheskiy analiz. Moscow: MIR, 488.
  32. Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the Generalized Distance in Statistics. Proc. of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2 (1), 49–55.
  33. Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7 (2), 179–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02137.x
  34. Sira, O. V., Katkova, T. I. (2009). Neiromerezheva produktsiyna ekspertna systema diahnostyky stanu. Naukovi pratsi VNTU, 2, 59–64.
  35. Miachyn, V. H., Kutsynska, M. V. (2016). Neiromerezhevyi pidkhid do klasteryzatsiyi haluzei promyslovosti Ukrainy za dzherelamy finansuvannia innovatsiynoiyi aktyvnosti pidpryiemstv. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky, 20, 64–68.
  36. Tkachova, A. V. (2012). Klasternyi analiz metalurhiynykh pidpryiemstv na osnovi vyrobnychykh, finansovo-ekonomichnykh ta lohistychnykh pokaznykiv diyalnosti. Visnyk Zaporizkoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 1 (13), 37–44. Available at: http://web.znu.edu.ua/herald/issues/2012/eco-1-2012/037-44.pdf
  37. Karpenko, O. O. (2015). Obgruntuvannia efektyvnosti klasteryzatsiyi transportno-lohistychnykh pidpryiemstv. Vodnyi transport, 2, 126–133. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Vodt_2015_2_20
  38. Ducret, R., Lemarié, B., Roset, A. (2016). Cluster Analysis and Spatial Modeling for Urban Freight. Identifying Homogeneous Urban Zones Based on Urban Form and Logistics Characteristics. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 301–313. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.067
  39. Kovalova, O. V., Oliinyk, R. V. (2011). Analiz rehionalnoi dorozhno-transportnoi merezhi metodom ierarkhichnoi klasteryzatsiyi. Avtomobilni dorohy i dorozhne budivnytstvo, 82, 3–10.
  40. Aloshynskyi, Ye. S., Zambrybor, H. H. (2014). Analiz peredumov formuvannia prykordonnykh transportno-lohistychnykh klasteriv dlia udoskonalennia mizhnarodnykh zaliznychnykh vantazhnykh perevezen. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Ukrainskoi derzhavnoi akademiyi zaliznychnoho transportu, 150, 11–17.
  41. Öcalir-Akünal, E. V., Erol, S. (2016). Using Cluster Analysis to Define the Position of a Developing Country in Global Transportation Services Trade Environment. Gazi University Journal of Science, 29 (4), 751–767.
  42. Rao, S. R. (1968). Lineynye statisticheskie metody i ih primenenie. Moscow: Nauka, 547.
  43. Saati, T. (1973). Celochislennye metody optimizacii i svyazannye s nimi ekstremal'nye problemy. Moscow: Mir, 302.
  44. Saati, T. (1993). Prinyatie resheniy. Metod analiza ierarhiy. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 320.
  45. Saati, T., Kerns, K. (1991). Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizaciya sistem. Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 224.
  46. Andreychikov, A. V., Andreychikova, O. N. (2004). Analiz, sintez, planirovanie resheniy v ekonomike. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 464.
  47. Fomenko, N. A. Prakticheskoe primenenie metoda analiza ierarhiy. Available at: http://anf-ocenka.narod.ru/35.pdf
  48. Katkova, T. I. (2015). Evaluation of importance of figures by pairwise comparisons with scalarization of vector criterion. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (74)), 62–68. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.40567
  49. Seraya, O. V., Raskin, L. G. (2003). Formirovanie skalyarnogo kriteriya predpochteniya po rezul'tatam poparnyh sravneniy ob'ektov. Vestnik NTU «KhPI», 6, 63–38.
  50. Seraya, O. V., Chumakova, E. V. (2009). Ispol'zovanie metoda analiza ierarhiy i ego modifikacii v zadachah vybora predpochteniy. Vestnik NTU «KhPI», 23, 122–126.
  51. Karakulova, E. V., Karakulov, A. V., Zenkova, Zh. N. (2011). AVS-analiz ispol'zovaniya lekarstvennyh sredstv i ego modifikacii. Medicina i obrazovanie v Sibiri, 4. Available at: http://ngmu.ru/cozo/mos/article/text_full.php?id=503
  52. Dovidnyk kodiv tovariv zghidno z Ukrainskoiu klasyfikatsieiu tovariv zovnishnoekonomichnoi diyalnosti (UKT ZED). Available at: http://exportdesk.org.ua/files/0/a/0ab8c8c-----------------------------------------.pdf
  53. Mytna statystyka. Derzhavna fiskalna sluzhba Ukrainy. Available at: http://www.sfs.gov.ua/ms/
  54. Alad'ev, V. Z. (2006). Osnovy programmirovaniya v Maple. Tallin, 300. Available at: http://www.aladjev-maple.narod.ru/Maple.pdf
  55. Lukinskiy, V. S., Berezhnoy, V. I. (2004). Logistika avtomobil'nogo transporta. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 368.
  56. Khalipova, N. V. (2013). Orhanizatsiya mizhnarodnykh perevezen vantazhiv na pidstavi systemnoho analizu upravlinnia ryzykamy. Visnyk Skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Dalia, 6 (195), 192–204.
  57. Raskin, L. G., Seraya, O. V. (2008). Nechetkaya matematika. Kharkiv: Parus, 352.
  58. Pawlak, Z. (1982). Rough sets. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences, 11 (5), 341–356. doi: 10.1007/bf01001956
  59. Raskin, L., Sira, O. (2016). Fuzzy models of rough mathematics. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (4 (84)), 53–60. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.86739
  60. Raskin, L., Sira, O. (2016). Method of solving fuzzy problems of mathematical programming. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (83)), 23–28. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.81292

Downloads

Published

2018-04-16

How to Cite

Bosov, A., Khalipova, N., Prohoniuk, I., Kuzmenko, V., Duhanets, V., & Shevchenko, I. (2018). Development of method of multifactor classification of transport and logistic processes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3 (92), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.128679

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 3 (92) (2018): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Arkadii Bosov, Nataliya Khalipova, Iryna Prohoniuk, Violetta Kuzmenko, Viktor Duhanets, Inna Shevchenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.