DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.1.2018.178169

PACIFIC MEANS OF DISPUTE SETTLEMENT IN THE WTO: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES

Liliia Khasanova, Adel Abdullin

Abstract


Abstract. Article 5 DSU lists means of pacific settlement of disputes that can be used instead or alongside with settlement of a particular dispute. Good offices, conciliation and mediation is an adherence of WTO dispute settlement mechanism to the principle of pacific settlement of disputes in international law enshrined in United Nations Charter and reminder of diplomatic approach that was dominating the previous GATT system. Nowadays, non-litigious ways of dispute settlement in WTO have a potential to be on rise, due to crisis situation caused by US in Appellate Body and Dispute Settlement Body in general. This article looks into reasons why means enshrined in Article 5 were not used by
Member states frequently enough since establishment of the WTO. It looks closely into definitions and history of Article 5 DSU. Based on empirical observations, authors come to a conclusion that mediation has a potential and perspectives to be used more frequently in the future of the WTO dispute settlement. Mediation is treated as a unique mechanism that can be used by developing and least-developed countries to receive third-party assistance and mitigate power imbalances. Factors for successful mediation are deducted from the case analysis and interviews with representatives of permanent missions.
Key words: mediation, good offices, conciliation, pacific settlement of disputes, WTO, mutually agreed
solution


Full Text:

PDF

References


Communication of a Director-General, WT/DSB/25.

Decision of GATT from April 5, 1966, BISD 14S/18.

Dispute Settlement Body, Special Session, Jordan’s Contribution towards the Improvement and Clarification

of the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding, TN/DS/W/43, 28 January 2003.

Dispute Settlement Body, Special Session, Negotiations on Improvements and Clarifications of the Dispute

Settlement Understanding, Communication from Paraguay, TN/DS/W/16, 25 September 2002.

. European Communities - Regime for the Importation of Bananas initiated by Colombia WT/DS361/2;

European Communities – Regime For The Importation of Bananas initiated by Panama WT/DS364/2.

General Council, Request for Mediation by Philippines, Thailand and the European Communities, WT/GC/66,

October 2002.

General Council, Request for Mediation by Philippines, Thailand and the European Communities,

WT/GC/66/Add. 2, 23 December 2002.

Handbook on the WTO Dispute Settlement System, World Trade Organization, Cambridge University Press, 2017.

Hansel T. P. Developing Countries and the WTO: the need for more mediation// Harvard Negotiation Law

Review, Vol. 9, 2004.

Horlick G. The consultation phase of the WTO dispute resolution: a private practitioner’s view // The

International Lawyer, Vol. 32, No. 3, Symposium on the First Three Years of the WTO Dispute Settlement

System, pp. 685-693.

Khasanova L. Negotiating Disputes in the WTO- Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law// International Law and

Integration Problems, 2017, №3 (51), pp.31-37.

Khasanova L., Abdullin A. Negotiating disputes in the WTO: using procedural advantages introduced by the

system// RevistaQUID(SpecialIssue), 2017, pp.1389-1394.

Improvements of the GATT Dispute Settlement Rules and Procedures, Decision of the Contracting Parties of

April 1989, BISD 36S/61, para. D.

Official website of Department of Trade and Industry of the Republic of Philippines: “Philippine Tuna Canners

Enjoy EU Zero Tariff”. Available at : https://www.dti.gov.ph/27-main-content/emb-news/9370-philippine-

tuna-canners-enjoy-eu-zero-tariff

Petersmann Ernst-Ulrich, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International

Organizations and Dispute Settlement, Deventer: Kluwer, 1997, 344 pp.

Shaffer G. et al. US Threats to WTO Appellate Body// University of California Legal Studies Research Paper

Series No. 2017-63.

Understanding regarding notification, consultation, dispute settlement and surveillance, 28 November 1979,

BISD 26S/210, para8.

Valeev R, Kurdukov G., International law, Moscow: Statut 2011, p. 128-130.

Weiss F., Improving WTO Procedural Law: Problems and Lessons from the Practice of Other International

Courts and Tribunals, in Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures: Issues and Lessons from the Practice

of Other International Courts and Tribunals 17, 70-73 (Freidl Weiss ed., 2000).

WTO Analytical Index, DSU-Article 5 (practice) available at:

https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/ai17_e/dsu_art5_oth.pdf