The state of the immune system in pregnant women after organ-sparing treatment of borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries

Authors

  • Oleksiy Egorov Kharkiv National Medical University, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11638521

Keywords:

pregnancy, immune system, borderline tumors, early oncological pathology of ovaries

Abstract

Introduction. The efficiency of standard organ-sparing operations for borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries is high both from an oncological point of view and in terms of preserving reproductive function and quality of life. The state of the immune system of the mother and fetus during pregnancy is the most important problem of modern obstetrics. The purpose of the study was to study the state of the immune system in pregnant women after organ-sparing treatment of borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries. Materials and methods. The main group included 40 pregnant women who, 2 to 5 years ago, underwent organ-preserving treatment for borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries (malignant ovarian tumors of stages Ia and Ic). The control group included 40 practically healthy pregnant women with an uncomplicated history and physiological course of this pregnancy. In the examined women, the immune status was established according to absolute and relative indicators of cellular and humoral links of systemic immunity - assessment of the concentration of immunoglobulins of class A, G and M in blood serum according to Manchini and in cervical mucus, as well as analysis of indicators of cellular immunity using the method of monoclonal antibodies. The concentration of secretory immunoglobulin A (sIg A) in biological fluid was studied by enzyme immunoassay. Results and discussion. The conducted studies showed that in pregnant women after organ-preserving treatment of borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries, there is a decrease in the number of T-lymphocytes by 18.4%, as well as changes in the percentage of the subpopulation of T-helpers and T-suppressors with a noticeable increase in the level of CD4+ (T- helpers) by 17.8% and a sharp decrease in CD8+ (T-suppressors) by 26.7%, which indicates the blocking of the immune response and the possibility of allergic or autoimmune disorders in this category of women. Along with this, an increase in the level of CD56+ (natural natural killers) was noted by 31.4% in comparison with similar indicators of the control group. An increase in the immunoregulatory index was also noted, which may be evidence of the activation of autoimmune processes. The results of the study of the humoral link of systemic immunity in pregnant women of the main group allowed establishing the following violations: the concentration of immunoglobulin M and A increases, as well as the concentration of immunoglobulin G and circulating immune complexes (by 2.9 times compared to control indicators). During the evaluation of the concentration of class A, G and M immunoglobulins in the cervical mucus of pregnant women after organ-sparing treatment of borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries, as the most informative indicators of local humoral immunity, an increase in the concentration of Ig G by 33.2% and a decrease in Ig A by 27 .1% compared to the control group. There was also a significant increase in Ig M indicators by 37.4% compared to the control group. The above indicates that a secondary immunodeficiency condition is formed in this category of women. Conclusions. 1. In pregnant women, after organ-preserving treatment of borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries, there are changes in the cellular link of the immune system, which are manifested in a violation of autonomous immune self-regulation, first of all, in a decrease in the recognition function and weakening of suppressor mechanisms in the process of forming an immune response. 2. The obtained data indicate that in pregnant women of the main group, changes in the local immune system are accompanied by various disturbances, which is manifested by a decrease in the concentration of Ig A, sIg A and an increase in Ig G and Ig M.

Key words: pregnancy, immune system, borderline tumors, early oncological pathology of ovaries.

References

Temkin SM, Bergstrom J, Samimi G, Minasian L. Ovarian cancer prevention in high-risk women. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 60 (4): 738–57.

Walker JL, Powell CB, Chen LM, et al. Society of Gynecologic Oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer 2020; 121: 2108–20.

Schüler S, Ponnath M, Engel J, et al. Ovarian epithelial tumors and reproductive factors: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 287:1187–204.

Van de Vrie R, Rutten MJ, Asseler JD, et al. Laparoscopy for diagnosing resectability of disease in women with advanced ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 3.

Lawrie T.A., Winter-Roach B.A., Heus P., Kitchener H.C. (2020) Adjuvant (postsurgery) chemotherapy for early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 12: CD004706.

Bergamini A, Petrone M, Rabaiotti E, et al. Fertility sparing surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer in Italy: perceptions, practice, and main issues. Gynecol Endocrinol 2021; 34 (4): 305–8.

Koo Y.J., Kim J.E., Kim Y.H. et al. (2022) Comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: surgical and oncological outcomes. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 25: 111–117.

Ying Zhang, Shuying Fan, Yang Xiang et al. (2023) Comparison of the prognosis and recurrence of apparent early-stage ovarian tumors treated with laparoscopy and laparotomy: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. BMC Cancer, 15: 597.

Park JY. Safety of fertility-sparing surgery for stage I ovarian clear cell carcinoma. J Gynecol Oncol 2020; 28 (6).

Daisuke A. (2021) Laparoscopic surgery for early ovarian cancer. J. Gynecol. Oncol., 25(3): 168–169.

Hengeveld EM, Zusterzeel PLM, Lajer H, et al. The value of surgical staging in patients with apparent early stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 154 (2): 308–13.

Stenzel AE, Buas MF, Moysich KB, et al. Survival disparities among racial/ethnic groups of women with ovarian cancer: An update on data from the surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) registry. Cancer Epidemiol 2021; 62 (7): 101580.

Botha M.H., Rajaram S., Karunaratne K. Cancer in pregnancy. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2022; 143 (suppl. 2): 137-142. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12621.

Laba OV. Profilaktyka porushen fetoplatsentarnoho kompleksu u zhinok iz ryzykom i zahrozoyu peredchasnykh polohiv (Ohlyad literatury). Reproduktyvne zdorovya zhinky. 2021;2:32-6.

Kim CJ, Romero R, Chaemsaithong P, Kim JS. Chronic inflammation of the placenta: definition, classification, pathogenesis, and clinical significance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;213(4 Suppl):53-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.041.

Surbek D, Vial Y, Girard T, Breymann C, Bencaiova GA, Baud D, et al. Patient blood management (PBM) in pregnancy and childbirth: literature review and expert opinion. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301(2):627-41. doi: 10.1007/ s00404-019-05374-8.

Tsakiridis I, Bousi V, Dagklis Th, Sardeli Ch, Nikolopoulou V, Papazisis G. Epidemiology of antenatal depression among women with high-risk pregnancies due to obstetric complications: a scoping review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022;300(4):849-59. doi: 10.1007/ s00404-019-05270-1.

Published

2024-06-15

How to Cite

Egorov, O. . (2024). The state of the immune system in pregnant women after organ-sparing treatment of borderline tumors and early oncological pathology of the ovaries. Annals of Mechnikov’s Institute, (2), 38–40. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11638521

Issue

Section

Research Articles