Microorganisms antibiotic sensitivity determination in urinary tract infections

Автор(и)

  • O Shapovalova National University of Pharmacy,
  • О Shevcova Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine,
  • O Sokolova Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology National Academy of Medical Science of Ukraine,

Ключові слова:

urinary infections, antibiotics, Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus, Morganella, Citrobacter, Serratia, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Candida

Анотація

Introduction. Nowadays Urinary tract infections (UTI) are considered to be the most common bacterial infections. Escherichia coli is the most frequently uropathogen. Other microorganisms of the genera Enterococcus, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, Proteus, Morganella, Citrobacter, Serratia, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Candida are also isolated with variable frequency. In recent years there has been a decreasing tendency of the causative agents of UTI sensitivity to various antibiotics, which causes growth of an inefficiencytreatment risk. In connection with the above the investigations were carried out with the purpose to identify the actual causative agents of bacteriuria and their sensitivity to antibiotics and antifungal drugs. Materials and methods. Bacteriological examination of urine was performed at 42 patients of SI "Sytenko Institute of Spine and Joint Pathology, AMS of Ukraine" clinic. The bacteriological method for determining the number of bacteria in the test material, cultural and bacterioscopic methods for identifying microorganisms and disk-diffusion method for sensitivity of microorganisms to antibiotics determining were used.The clinical material for the study was an average portion of the morning urine or urine collected by catheter. The biological material collection and bacteriological examination was carried by quantitative method, the isolated microorganisms identification and their sensitivity to antibiotics determining was performed by standard methods in accordance with current guidelines. We used the following antibiotics group to determine the microorganisms sensitivity: penicillin, cephalosporin, karbapenems, tetracyclines, aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolones, oxazolidinones, macrolides, lincosamides, glycopeptides, antifungal antibiotics.

Results and discussion. During the biological material study 55 isolates of bacterial and fungal pathogens were obtained. The microorganisms’ concentration in urine was in the range of 3,0x106 CFU/ml to 3,0x109 CFU/ml, and the most bacterial isolates content was equal 1,5x109 CFU/ml. Among the most commonly identified microorganisms Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus spp. were often detected in 5,3x108 CFU/ml concentrations. For Streptococcus spp. and Proteus mirabilis that value was 1,5x109 CFU/ml; for Klebsiella pneumonia - 3,0x108 CFU/ml; for Candida spp. - 3,0x106 CFU/ml respectively. The most common microorganisms (which frequency of occurrence in urine was ≥ 5%) were: E. coli (14,5±4,7)%, Str. agalactiae and St. haemolyticus (10,9±4,2)%; St. aureus and Pr. mirabilis (7,3±3,5)%; St. epidermidis, Kl. pneumoniae, St. hominis,Candida spp. (5,4±3,0)%. While analyzing obtained results we concluded that meropenem was the most effective drug, 78,7% of all cultures had the sensitivity to it. The sensitivity to gatifloxacin had 73,7% of cultures; to tigecycline – 71,1% of isolates; to amikacin -67,3% of cultures; to moxifloxacin – 59,6% of isolates; to two drugs (levofloxacin and pefloxacin) - 55,8% of isolates respectively. It was found that Staphylococcus aureus appeared to be resistant to vancomycin, ampicillin, cefuroxime, cefazolin, azithromycin, linezolid. This species and St. epidermidis and St. hominis isolates were multi-drug resistant to four or more drugs from different groups. All Streptococcus agalactiae isolates were insensitive to cefuroxime. All Escherichia cultures were resistant to cefuroxime, Proteus - to cefuroxime, ampicillin and cefazolin. E. coli, Pr. mirabilis,K. pneumoniae, Ps. aeruginosa, Ac. haemolyticus had multi-drug resistance. In addition, (73,1 ± 6,1)% of all 52 bacterial isolates obtained were resistant to amoxiclav.

Conclusions. 1. The most common microorganisms (which incidence in urine were ≥ 5%) are: Escherichia coli (14,5±4,7)%, Streptococcus agalactiae and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (10,9±4,2)%; Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis (7,3±3,5)%; Staphylococcus epidermidis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus hominis,Candida spp. (5,4±3,0)%. 2. The most effective antibacterial drug is meropenem. 78,7% of all isolates have sensitivity to it. The sensitivity to gatifloxacin have 73,7%; to tigecycline 71,1%; to amikacin – 67,3%, to moxifloxacin – 59,6% of cultures, to two agents (levofloxacin and pefloxacin) – 55,8% of cultures respectively. 3. 100% of the family Micrococcaceae isolates were resistant to benzylpenicillin, 95,8% - to ampicillin, 87,5% - to amoxicillin and cefuroxime, 83,3% - to azithromycin, erythromycin and lincomycin. Members of the Streptococcaceae family were resistant to cefuroxime. 100% of the family Enterobacteriaceae isolates had no sensitivity to carbenicillin, 87,5% of isolates - to cefuroxim and gentamicin, 81,2% - to amoxicillin and ampicillin, 75,0% - to cefazolin, 50,0% - to ceftriaxonum and aztreonam. 4. Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus hominis Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis,Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter haemolyticus isolates were multi-drug resistant.

Посилання

Foxman B. Epidemiology of urinary tract infections: incidence, morbidity, and economic costs / // Dis Mon. 2003 Feb;49(2):53-70.

Urinary tract infections in intensive care unit patients - a single-centre, 3-year observational study according to the INICC project / Duszyńska W [et al.] // Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2016;48(1):1-6.

Current State of Antibiotic Resistance of Pathogens Causing Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections in Russia: «DARMIS» Study (2010–2011)/ I.S. Palagin [et al.] // Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. Chemotherapy. - 2012, Vol. 14, № 4. – P. 280-302.

Development of a web application for recording bacterial etiologic agents and their antimicrobial susceptibility to improve the treatment of urinary tract infections and monitor resistance to antibiotics/ F. Gómez-Palomo [et al.] // Revista Española de Quimioterapia Advance Access published March 11, 2016: www/ URL.: http://seq.es/seq/0214-3429/29/2/gomez11mar2016.pdf.

Surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility of Escherichia coli producing urinary tract infections in Galicia (Spain)/ M. Treviño [et al.] // Revista Española de Quimioterapia. Advance Access published March 11, 2016: www/ URL.: http://seq.es/seq/0214-3429/29/2/trevino11mar2016.pdf.

Predicting antibiotic prescription after symptomatic treatment for urinary tract infection: development of a model using data from an RCT in general practice/ I. Gágyor [et al.] // Br J Gen Pract. Advance Access published Mar 10, 2016: www/ URL.: http://bjgp.org/content/early/2016/03/09/bjgp16X684361.long.

Ukraine MH Order ¹ 167 from 05.04.2007 "On confirmation of guidance "Determination of the microorganisms sensitivity to antibiotics”. - Kyiv, 2007.

The USSR MH Order № 535 from 22.04.1985 "On the unification of microbiological (bacteriological) methods of research used in clinical diagnostic laboratories of medical institutions." - M., 1985.

Holt, J. Bergey’sManual of Determinative Bacteriology. In 2 t. [Text]/ J. Holt, N. Kreig Translated from English, ed. By Acad. RAS GA Zavarzin. – M.: “The World”, 1997. – Vol. 1. – 432 p., Vol. 2. – 368 p.

##submission.downloads##

Як цитувати

Shapovalova, O., Shevcova О., & Sokolova, O. (2020). Microorganisms antibiotic sensitivity determination in urinary tract infections. Анали Мечниковського Інституту, (2), 10–15. вилучено із https://journals.uran.ua/ami/article/view/191000

Номер

Розділ

Дослідні статті