Determining the statistical properties of a robust control object identification algorithm using mixed correntropy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.353218

Keywords:

robust resilience, correntropy, kernel, algorithm convergence, steady state mode of motion, simulation modeling

Abstract

Identification process in stationary and non-stationary control objects has been investigated in this study. The task addressed is to construct mathematical models, to devise methods and procedures, and to develop programs focused on solving object identification problems.

This paper tackles the issue of robust identification of control objects under the action of additive random noise of various statistical nature, in particular Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise. An approach to building identification algorithms based on the mixed correntropy criterion has been proposed, which combines the advantages of classical mean-square methods and information-theoretic optimality criteria.

The use of Price's theorem made it possible to define convergence conditions for the robust identification algorithm in both stationary and non-stationary cases in the presence of Gaussian and non-Gaussian noise. The influence of algorithm parameters and noise characteristics on its dynamic properties has been established. Expressions for determining the optimal values of the algorithm's convergence parameter, which ensure the maximum convergence rate, have been derived.

To confirm theoretical findings, simulation modeling was carried out, the results of which confirm the effectiveness of the proposed approach and its advantages compared to conventional identification methods, especially under conditions of non-Gaussian noise and nonstationarity, which indicates the feasibility of its use in adaptive and robust control systems.

However, the resulting estimates are rather general and depend both on the degree of nonstationarity of the object and on the statistical characteristics of usable signals and disturbances, which are often unknown. Therefore, the results could be applied in practice if such information is available or when estimates of these characteristics are used

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Bezsonov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Computer Intelligent Technologies and Systems

Serhii Liashenko, State Biotechnological University

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Mechatronics, Life Safety and Quality Management

Oleg Rudenko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Doctor of Technical Sciences

Department of Computer Intelligent Technologies and Systems

Serhii Rudenko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD Student

Department of Informatics

Kyrylo Oliinyk, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Assistant

Department of Computer Intelligent Technologies and Systems

References

  1. Frank, S. A. (2018). Control Theory Tutorial. In SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91707-8
  2. Petropoulos, F., Apiletti, D., Assimakopoulos, V., Babai, M. Z., Barrow, D. K., Ben Taieb, S. et al. (2022). Forecasting: theory and practice. International Journal of Forecasting, 38 (3), 705–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.11.001
  3. Nasrabad, N. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Journal of Electronic Imaging, 16 (4). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2819119
  4. Huber, P. J., Ronchetti, E. M. (2009). Robust Statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470434697
  5. Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J., Stahel, W. A. (2005). Robust Statistics. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118186435
  6. Chambers, J. A., Tanrikulu, O., Constantinides, A. G. (1994). Least mean mixed-norm adaptive filtering. Electronics Letters, 30 (19), 1574–1575. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19941060
  7. Arenas-García, J., Figueiras-Vidal, A. R. (2005). Adaptive combination of normalised filters for robust system identification. Electronics Letters, 41 (15), 874–875. https://doi.org/10.1049/el:20051936
  8. Rudenko, O., Bezsonov, O., Lebediev, O., Serdiuk, N. (2019). Robust identification of non-stationary objects with nongaussian interference. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (101)), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.181256
  9. Pazaitis, D. I., Constantinides, A. G. (1999). A novel kurtosis driven variable step-size adaptive algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 47 (3), 864–872. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.747793
  10. Principe, J. C. (2010). Information Theoretic Learning. In Information Science and Statistics. Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1570-2
  11. Principe, J. C., Xu, D., Zhao, Q., Fisher, J. W. (2000). Learning from Examples with Information Theoretic Criteria. Journal of VLSI Signal Processing Systems for Signal, Image and Video Technology, 26 (1-2), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008143417156
  12. Chen, B., Zhu, Y., Hu, J., Principe, J. C. (2013). System Parameter Identification: Information Criteria and Algorithms. Elsevier Inc., 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/c2012-0-01233-1
  13. Santamaria, I., Pokharel, P. P., Principe, J. C. (2006). Generalized correlation function: definition, properties, and application to blind equalization. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 54 (6), 2187–2197. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2006.872524
  14. Liu, W., Pokharel, P. P., Principe, J. C. (2007). Correntropy: Properties and Applications in Non-Gaussian Signal Processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55 (11), 5286–5298. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsp.2007.896065
  15. Flores, T. K. S., Villanueva, J. M. M., Gomes, H. P., Catunda, S. Y. C. (2021). Adaptive Pressure Control System Based on the Maximum Correntropy Criterion. Sensors, 21 (15), 5156. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21155156
  16. Leite, G. R., Araújo, Í. B. Q. de, Martins, A. de M. (2023). Regularized Maximum Correntropy Criterion Kalman Filter for Uncalibrated Visual Servoing in the Presence of Non-Gaussian Feature Tracking Noise. Sensors, 23 (20), 8518. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23208518
  17. Wu, C., Lin, D., Zheng, Y., He, F., Wang, S. (2026). Maximum correntropy criterion-based Kalman filter for replay attack in non-Gaussian noises. Signal Processing, 238, 110098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2025.110098
  18. Rudenko, O., Bezsonov, O., Borysenko, V., Borysenko, T., Lyashenko, S. (2021). Developing a multi-step recurrent algorithm to maximize the criteria of correntropy. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (4 (109)), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.225765
  19. Chen, B., Wang, X., Li, Y., Principe, J. C. (2019). Maximum Correntropy Criterion With Variable Center. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 26 (8), 1212–1216. https://doi.org/10.1109/lsp.2019.2925692
  20. Rudenko, O., Bezsonov, O. (2022). Adaptive identification under the maximum correntropy criterion with variable center. RADIOELECTRONIC AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, 1, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.32620/reks.2022.1.17
  21. Hu, C., Wang, G., Ho, K. C., Liang, J. (2021). Robust Ellipse Fitting With Laplacian Kernel Based Maximum Correntropy Criterion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 30, 3127–3141. https://doi.org/10.1109/tip.2021.3058785
  22. Ye, X., Lu, S., Wang, J., Wu, D., Zhang, Y. (2023). Robust State Estimation Using the Maximum Correntropy Cubature Kalman Filter with Adaptive Cauchy-Kernel Size. Electronics, 13 (1), 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13010114
  23. Chen, B., Xie, Y., Wang, X., Yuan, Z., Ren, P., Qin, J. (2022). Multikernel Correntropy for Robust Learning. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 52 (12), 13500–13511. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcyb.2021.3110732
  24. Xue, N., Luo, X., Gao, Y., Wang, W., Wang, L., Huang, C., Zhao, W. (2019). Kernel Mixture Correntropy Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for Time Series Prediction. Entropy, 21 (8), 785. https://doi.org/10.3390/e21080785
  25. Li, X., Guo, Y., Meng, Q. (2022). Variational Bayesian-Based Improved Maximum Mixture Correntropy Kalman Filter for Non-Gaussian Noise. Entropy, 24 (1), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/e24010117
  26. Li, G., Zhang, H., Wang, S., Wang, G., Zhao, J. (2025). Generalized mixed-norm maximum correntropy for robust adaptive filtering. Applied Acoustics, 228, 110382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110382
  27. Yuan, C., Zhou, C., Peng, J., Li, H. (2024). Mixture correntropy-based robust distance metric learning for classification. Knowledge-Based Systems, 295, 111791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2024.111791
  28. Bai, X., Ge, Q., Zeng, P. (2025). DCM_MCCKF: A non-Gaussian state estimator with adaptive kernel size based on CS divergence. Neurocomputing, 617, 128809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128809
  29. Li, S., Xu, S., Jin, X., Tan, P. (2025). Comparison of Kernel Functions in Generalized M-estimation Using Fixed-Point Iteration. Advances in Guidance, Navigation and Control, 596–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-2216-0_57
  30. Price, R. (1958). A useful theorem for nonlinear devices having Gaussian inputs. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 4 (2), 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/tit.1958.1057444
Determining the statistical properties of a robust control object identification algorithm using mixed correntropy

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

How to Cite

Bezsonov, O., Liashenko, S., Rudenko, O., Rudenko, S., & Oliinyk, K. (2026). Determining the statistical properties of a robust control object identification algorithm using mixed correntropy. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(4 (139), 36–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2026.353218

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects