Clustering method based on fuzzy binary relation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.94961

Keywords:

cluster analysis, automatic object classification, data mining, fuzzy clustering

Abstract

Heuristic methods of fuzzy clustering hold a special place in data mining. They are important in preliminary data analysis when the number of clusters, their structure and mutual arrangement are unknown.

The object clustering methods, based on fuzzy binary relations are generalized by developing clear and fuzzy single-level clustering methods, clear and fuzzy sequential multi-level clustering methods. Possible examples of fuzzy binary relations, which characterize similarity of objects by length, angle and distance of their vector features are presented. For this purpose, the Harrington type desirability function and scale, enabling effective analysis of clustering results are suggested.

Based on the proposed methods, the software systems that were effectively used for solving applied clustering problems are developed. Also, the study illustrated the clear single-level clustering method on a specific example.

It is shown that application of the apparatus of fuzzy binary relations in clustering provides an additional opportunity to study the dynamics of the number of clusters, their structure and determine the degree of similarity of objects in a cluster. The results can be used for preliminary data analysis and for holding the object clustering procedure.

Author Biography

Natalia Kondruk, State Higher Education Institution «Uzhhorod National University» Narodna sq., 3, Uzhgorod, Ukraine, 88000

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of cybernetics and applied mathematics 

References

  1. Alsmadi, M. K. (2014). A hybrid firefly algorithm with fuzzy-c mean algorithm for MRI brain segmentation. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 11 (9), 1676–1691. doi: 10.3844/ajassp.2014.1676.1691
  2. Giusti, E., Marsili-Libelli, S. (2015). A Fuzzy Decision Support System for irrigation and water conservation in agriculture. Environmental Modelling & Software, 63, 73–86. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.020
  3. Egrioglu, E., Aladag, C. H., Yolcu, U. (2013). Fuzzy time series forecasting with a novel hybrid approach combining fuzzy c-means and neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 40 (3), 854–857. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.040
  4. Son, L. H., Cuong, B. C., Lanzi, P. L., Thong, N. T. (2012). A novel intuitionistic fuzzy clustering method for geo-demographic analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 39 (10), 9848–9859. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.167
  5. Saha, S., Das, R. (2017). Exploring differential evolution and particle swarm optimization to develop some symmetry-based automatic clustering techniques: application to gene clustering. Neural Computing and Applications. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2710-0
  6. Ouadfel, S., Meshoul, S. (2012). Handling Fuzzy Image Clustering with a Modified ABC Algorithm. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 4 (12), 65–74. doi: 10.5815/ijisa.2012.12.09
  7. Sahin, R. (2014). Neutrosophic Hierarchical Clustering Algoritms. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2, 18–24.
  8. Abad, M. J. F. H., Derakhshan-Barjoei, P. (2012). Heuristic Model of Cellular Learning Automata for Fuzzy Rule Extraction. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4 (12), 1701–1707.
  9. Demin, D. A. (2013). Mathematical modeling in the problem of selecting optimal control of obtaining alloys for machine parts in uncertainty conditions. Problems of mechanical engineering, 16 (6), 15–23.
  10. Shmalyuk, I. Yu., Bushyn, I. M. (2015). Software implementation of the BSP algorithm for clusterization of social networks. Technology audit and production reserves, 2 (2 (22)), 21–26. doi: 10.15587/2312-8372.2015.40779
  11. Kondruk, N. E., Malyar, M. M. (2010). Application of multicriteria models for the problems of a balanced diet. Bulletin of Cherkasy State Technological University. Series: Engineering Sciences, 1, 3–7.
  12. Kondruk, N. E., Malyar, N. N. (2009). Some applications of clustering criterion space for selection tasks. Computer Mathematics, 2, 142–149.
  13. Kondruk, N. E. (2015). Decision Support Systems for automated diets. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 23 (1), 110–114.
  14. Kondruk, N. E. (2014). Some methods of automatic grouping of objects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (4 (68)), 20–24. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/22930/20939
  15. Harrington, E. C. (1965). The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control, 494–498.
  16. Vyatchenin, D. A. (2004). Nechetkie metody avtomaticheskoj сlassifikacii. Minsk: UP Tehnoprint, 219.
  17. Pedrycz, W. (1985). Algorithms of fuzzy clustering with partial supervision. Pattern Recognition Letters, 3 (1), 13–20. doi: 10.1016/0167-8655(85)90037-6
  18. Windham, M. P. (1981). Cluster validity for fuzzy clustering algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 5 (2), 177–185. doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(81)90015-4
  19. Tamura, S., Higuchi, S., Tanaka, K. (1971). Pattern Classification Based on Fuzzy Relations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-1 (1), 61–66. doi: 10.1109/tsmc.1971.5408605

Downloads

Published

2017-04-24

How to Cite

Kondruk, N. (2017). Clustering method based on fuzzy binary relation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(4 (86), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.94961

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects