Determination of physical development level and features of somatotype construction for women aged 21–25 years

Authors

  • Олена Шишкіна

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2020-1.010

Keywords:

women, health, physical development, biological age, somatotype

Abstract

Helena Shishkinа

Purpose: to determine the level of physical development and features of somatotype construction in women aged 21–25 years.

Material & Methods: the study involved young women aged 21–25 years (n=514) to determine changes in body length and body weight according to their age. At each age, the mean values of the one-, two-, and three-sigma ranges of values studied were calculated. To obtain average data, we measured the length and body weight of 120 women, 21 years of age, 100 years of age, 22 years of age, 98 years of age, 23 years, and 96 years of age, 24 years and 100 women aged 25 years. The following study left 150 women: 21 years (n=30), 22 years (n=30), 23 years (n=30), 24 years (n=30), and 25 years (n=30), in order to determine the biological age and qualitative characteristic of the orientation of the individual physical development and to obtain a purely individual characteristic of the somatotype. For this study were applied modified methods of clinical anthropometry by N. Ya. Breitman and height and weight index of K. Hirat, also methods of mathematical modeling using computer technologies, statistical processing of the obtained data.

Results: the study have been conducted to investigate changes the length and weight of women according to their age. The average values of length and body weights were calculated for women between the ages of twenty–one and twenty–five, which correspond to the following data: 1) 165.09±4.23 cm and 59.21±4.68 kg, 2) 165.37±4.43 cm and 59.68±5.74 kg, 3) 164.75±5.96 cm and 61.33±5.30 kg, 4) 166.15±5.80 cm and 62.21±5.20 kg, 5) 165.87±4.72 cm and 63.32±6.90 kg. The somatotypes for women were calculated according to N. Ya. Breitman and K. Hirat. The database included measurements of 15 anthropometric parameters of women: upper face, lower face, neck, acromio-nipple distance, nipple-navel distance, navel-inguinal distance, thigh, shin, foot, half acromial distance, half-teat distance, foot length from toe to end of thumb, shoulder length, length of forearm, brush length. The following somatotypes of women were identified: standard (32%, 48 persons), muscular (13%, 19 people), asthenic (15%, 23 individuals), respiratory (13%, 19 people), digestive (16%, 24 people), brain (5%, 7 people), infantile (7%, 10 people).

Conclusions: with increasing age, there is a shift in the individual values of the studied women along the coordinate axis of body weight in the direction of increase. Due to the construction of semantic space features, it is possible to compare individual height-weight ratios of women with average data in the age range of 21 to 25 years. This allows to determine the biological age and qualitative characteristics of the orientation of the individual physical development of women, which are reflected in the health passport.

References

Ажиппо, А.Ю., Шестерова, Л.Е., Друзь, В.А. (2016), Онтология теории конституциональной диагностики физического развития и индивидуальных особенностей проявления биологического возраста: монография, Харьков.

Ажиппо, А.Ю., Пугач, Я.И., Друзь, В.А., Жерновникова, Я.В. (2015), «Определение биологического возраста в различные периоды онтогенеза человека», Слобожанський науково-спортивний вiсник, № 4(48), С. 7-14.

Ашанин, В.С. (2014), Построение семантических пространств для описания психосоматической деятельности человека в экстремальных условиях: учебное пособие, Харьков.

Брейтман, М.Я. (1924), Введение в изучение о пропорциях и конституциях человеческого тела. Основы координированного генетического способа антропометрии: для антропологов, врачей, педагогов и художников, Ленинград.

Дутчак, М.В. (2015), «Парадигма оздоровчої рухової активності: теоретичне обгрунтування і практичне застосування», Теорія і методика фізичного виховання і спорту, № 2, С. 44-52.

Кашуба, В., Гончарова, Н., Дудко, М., Мартинюк, О. (2016), «До питання підвищення ефективності фізкультурно-оздоровчих занять різних груп населення», Молодіж. наук. вісн. Східноєвроп. нац. ун-ту ім. Лесі Українки, Вип. 24, С. 9-14.

Кукоба, Т.Б. (2011), Оздоровительная тренировка женщин 21-35 лет на основе упражнений изотонического характера с учетом соматотипа: автореферат, Омск.

Никитюк, Д.Б., Николенко В.Н., Клочкова, С.В., Миннибаев, Т.Ш. (2015), «Индекс массы тела и другие антропометрические показатели физического статуса с учетом возраста и индивидуально-типологических особенностей конституции женщин», Вопросы питания, № 4, С. 47-54.

Сивак, О., Прокопенко, О., Цикалюк, О., Полікарчук, І. (2019), Здоров’я жінок в Україні: права, можливості та рекомендації: посіб., Київ.

Чеховська, Л. (2017), «Фітнес-індустрія: стан і перспективи розвитку у країнах світу», Слобожанський науково-спортивний вiсник, № 2(58), С. 107-112.

Щелкунов, Д.А. (2007), Індивідуалізація фізичного розвитку в системі масового фізичного виховання: автореферат, Харків.

Hirata, K. (1968), The evaluating method of physique and physical fitness and its practical application.

Jackson, A.S., & Pollock, M.L. (1985), «Practical assessment of body composition», Phys Sports Med, No. 13(5), pp. 76-90.

Kohl, H.W. & Murray, T.D. (2012), Foundations of Physical Activity and Public Health. Champaing: Human Kinetics.

Pavlović, R. (2015), «Analysis of the elite athletes somatotypes», Physical Education, Sport, Kinesitherapy Research Journal, No. 9, pp. 47-53.

Toth, T., Michalikova, M., Bednarcikova, L., Zivcak, J. & Kneppo, P. (2014), «Somatotypes in sport», Mechanicaet Automatica, Vol. 8(№1), pp. 27-32.

Published

2020-02-29

How to Cite

Шишкіна, О. (2020). Determination of physical development level and features of somatotype construction for women aged 21–25 years. Slobozhanskyi Herald of Science and Sport, (1(75), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.15391/snsv.2020-1.010

Issue

Section

Articles