The Specifics of the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation of Representatives of «Person – Technics» Group of Professions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-43.167-186

Keywords:

«person – technics» group of professions, efficacy, efficacy evaluation, job satisfaction.

Abstract

The paper deals with the study of the factors related to efficacy of technical
professionals. Theoretical analysis brings up job satisfaction and job involvement
as such influential determinants.
According to the hypothesis of the empirical research, there is a relationship
between the efficacy and the job satisfaction. The sample included 40 gas
equipment fitters and 4 their direct managers. The hypothesis was verified
using Job Satisfaction Survey by R. Spector, Job Involvement Questionnaire
by R. N. Kanungo, and the questionnaire for employee efficiency assessment
by M. A. Shevchenko. We chose double-assessment of fitters' efficacy when
both employees and their managers evaluated how efficient an employee was
as this helped to eliminate the factor of subjectiveness. Unfortunately, there
is still no assessment form measuring the efficacy of gas equipment fitters
objectively.
The quasi-experiment was chosen as a research plan. The methods of
processing the empirical data included descriptive statistics, ρ-Spearman correlational
analysis, and φ* Fischer test.
The results showed that efficacy evaluation are related to the level of
job satisfaction and job involvement. There are meaningful correlations of
efficacy evaluation with salary satisfaction, promotion satisfaction, additional
concessions satisfaction, rewards satisfaction, and the character of work satisfaction.
There are no correlations of efficacy evaluation with job conditions
satisfaction, relations with colleagues satisfaction, and awareness satisfaction.
Employees with higher levels of efficacy evaluation are also typical of
higher job satisfaction and involvement. The practical application of the research
lies in its potential value for personnel managers and HR-departments
in selecting employees relevant for such a group of professions as well as motivating
those who work for being more satisfied and thus efficient.

Author Biographies

Світлана Моцна, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Student

Оксана Байєр, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University

Ph. D. in Psychology, Assistant Professor

References

Zimnjaja, I. A. (2004). Kljuchevye kompetentnosti kak rezul’tativno-celevaja osnova kompetentnosnogo podhoda v obrazovanii. Avtorskaja versija [Key competencies as an effective target basis of a competence-based approach in education. Author’s version]. Moskva : Issledovatel’skij centr problem kachestva podgotovki specialistov [in Russian].

Maddi, S. (2005). Smysloobrazovanie v processe prinjatija reshenij [Meaning in the decision-making process]. Psihologicheskij zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 26 (6), 87–101. Moscow : IP RAN [in Russian].

Onufriieva, L. A. (2016). Тeoretyko-metodolohichni zasady profesiinoi zrilosti osobystosti fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnykh profesii [Theoretical and methodological principles of professional maturity of socionomic specialist’s personality]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of Modern Psychology: Collection of Research Papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohienko National University and G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 31, 257–271. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma [in Ukrainian].

Onufriieva, L. A. (2018). The theoretical and methodological analysis of Me-professional image as a component of future professionals’ Meconcept. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of Modern Psychology: Collection of Research Papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University and G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine, 39, 195–205. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma [in Ukrainian]. DOI 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-39.195-205.

Panok, V. H., & Chepelieva, N. V. (1999). Profesіinyi vіdbіr [Professional selection]. Osnovy praktychnoi psykholohіi – The fundamentals of applied psychology, 228–236. Kyiv : Lybіd [in Ukrainian].

Raven, Dzh. (2002). Kompetentnost’ v sovremennom obshchestve [Competence in modern society]. Moskva : Kogito-Centr [in Russian].

Statinova, N. P., & Radchenko, S. H. (2001). Etyka biznesu [Ethics of business]. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shtepa, O. S. (2018). Holovni idei intentsionalnoi kontseptsii osobystisnoho samozdiisnennia [The Main Ideas of the Intentional Concept of Personality-Based Self-Realization]. Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovych prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ogiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the NAES of Ukraine, 41, 442–461. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma [in Ukrainian].

Kaap-Deeder, J., de Houwer, J., Hughes, S., Spruyt, A., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018). The development and validation of an implicit measure of competence need satisfaction. Motivation and emotion, 42 (5), 615–637. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9685-3.

Mansfield, R. S. (1996). Building Competency Models: Approaches for HR Professionals. Human Resource Management, 35 (1), 7–18. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/91d6/2eceb2b4288bde92b46f4c58c9dc5bcf9827.pdf.

Ryff, C. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.

Published

2019-01-31

How to Cite

Моцна, С., & Байєр, О. (2019). The Specifics of the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Efficacy Evaluation of Representatives of «Person – Technics» Group of Professions. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (43), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-43.167-186