Personal Сorrelates of Сreativity of Teenagers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-44.298-321

Keywords:

creativity, personal correlates of creativity, integrity, synthetism, freshness, independence of perception, erudition, speed, flexibility, originality of thinking, its divergence, intuition, fiction, foresight, fantasy, skepticism, criticality

Abstract

The article deals with the concept of «creativity» in scientific conceptions and theories. The content of approaches according to the definition of the essence of creativity was outlined. The psychological mechanisms related to the activity of teenagers with poetry were singled out. Based on the results of our research, in this article the personal correlates of creativity of teenagers were singled out. The first group of correlates includes: integrity, synthetism, freshness, independence of perception, orientation in solving a problem or a task; high sensitivity to sub-sensory stimuli, the ability to perceive inaccuracies, deviations, unusualness and uniqueness of the characteristics of the object; the ability to notice the main things, see what was not even potentially discovered; the ability to be exempted from a fixed setting in the process of perception. The second group of correlates contains: erudition due to the orientation of interests, and a high level of «forgetfulness» according to «ordinary» perception of live facts; the ability to easily capture the main things and quickly forget the secondary ones, the ability to create associations, a remarkable memorization of multi-valued ideas, subtexts; special emotions of the person, brightness and vividness of his/her imagination, unusual perception of objects, a high degree of fantasy and imagery (if the person is elder there is a shift of figurative creativity in abstract, scientific areas); speed, flexibility, originality of thinking, its divergence; intuition, fiction, foresight; fantasy, skepticism, criticality, a high degree of thinking activity (for the realization of creativity we need intellectual initiative, but creativity itself is not absolutely necessary for carrying out intellectual activity with simple objects); a high emotional excitement, joy, passion, presence of different emotions, desire for dominance, risk, attraction to independence, violation of order, removal of feelings of fear, frustration. The third group of correlates includes personal characteristics of creativity: deviation from patetrns in behavior, originality, initiative, persistence, dedication, extraordinary vigor, ingenuity, directness of judgments, honesty, spontaneity, agility, independence, liability, inner maturity, criticality, skepticism, courage, confidence in uncertainty and chaos, the ability to allegory, metaphorical, ambiguity, emphasizing the signi0xFB01cance of oneself, high self-esteem, pride; motivational peculiarities of creativity: the desire to participate in the process of creativity, to get acquainted with the facts and new information, to provide discoveries, to the establishment of regularities, to generalizations, to spiritual growth, to cooperation, to self-expression and self-affirmation, the enthusiasm for the content of cognitive activity, the ability to analyze and synthesize, the desire to remain alone sometimes, “to deepen on one’s own thoughts, the desire to develop aesthetic feelings.

Author Biographies

Ірина Рудзевич, Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiіenko University, Kamianets-Podilskyi

Ph.D. in Psychology, Assistant Professor

Алла Яцюрик, International University of Economics and Humanities named after Academician Stepan Demianchuk, Rivne

Ph.D. in Psychology, Assistant Professor

References

Adamar, Zh. (1970). Issledovanie psihologii processa izobretenija v oblasti matematiki [Study of the psychology of the process of invention in the field of mathematics]. Moskva : Pedagogika [in Russian].

Weinzweig, P. (1990). Desjat’ zapovedej tvorcheskoj lichnosti [Ten Com-mandments of a Creative Person]. Moskva : Progress [in Russian].

Vashchenko, I. V., & Onufriieva, L. A. (2018). Kontseptualni mezhi poniattia kopinh-stratehii osobystosti u psykholohii [Conceptual boundaries of the concept of сoping strategies of personality in psychology]. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of Modern Psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohienko National University, G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology at the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 41, 228–239. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma. DOI 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-41.228–239 [in Ukrainian].

Wertheimer, M. (1987). Produktivnoe myshlenie [Productive thinking]. Moskva : Progress [in Russian].

Zhabickaja, L. G. (1971). Voobrazhenie v vosprijatii hudozhestvennoj literatury [Imagination in the perception of fiction]. Sovetskaja pedagogika – Soviet pedagogy, 10, 81–88 [in Russian].

Maslow, A. (1994). Samoaktualizacija lichnosti i obrazovanija [Self-actualization of a person and education]. Donetsk [in Russian].

Moljako, V. A. (2007). Tvorcheskaja konstruktologija (prolegomeny) [Creative constructology (prolegomena)]. Kiev : «Osvita Ukrainy» [in Russian].

Mykhalchuk, N. O., & Ivashkevych, E. E. (2012). Spetsyfika transformatsii obrazu kentavra v odnoimennomu romani Dzhona Apdaika [The specificity of transformation of the image of the Centaur in the novel written by John Updike]. Aktualni problemy filolohii ta metodyky vykladannia humanitarnykh dystsyplin: Zb. nauk. prats «Naukovi zapysky RDHU» – Scientific notes of RSUH: Actual problems of philology and teaching methods of the humanities. Rivne : RDHU, 3–9 [in Ukrainian].

Mykhalchuk, N. O., & Ivashkevych, E. Z. (2013). Tekstualna ochevydnist i opovidna struktura romanu «Nichni okhorontsi» Alana Mura ta Deiva Hibbonsa [The textual evidence and narrative structure of the novel «Watchmen» by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons]. Aktualni problemy filolohii ta metodyky vykladannia humanitarnykh dystsyplin: Zb. nauk. prats «Naukovi zapysky RDHU» – Scientific notes of RSUH: Actual problems of philology and teaching methods of the humanities. Rivne : RDHU, 76–83 [in Ukrainian].

Mykhalchuk, N. O. (2007). Rol mekhanizmu prohnozuvannia v rozuminni shkoliaramy literaturnykh tvoriv na urokakh anhliiskoi movy [The role of the mechanism of prediction in understanding fiction by students at the English lessons]. S. D. Maksymenko (Ed.). Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy «Problemy zahalnoi ta pedahohichnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers of G.S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine «Problems of general and pedagogical psychology», 9, 3, 266–274. Kyiv : HNOZIS [in Ukrainian].

Onufriieva, L. A. (2014). Professional self-appraisal at the professional formation of future socionomic specialists’ personality. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zb. nauk. prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of Modern Psychology: Collection of research papers of the Kamianets-Podilskyi Ivan Ohienko National University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 26, 456–467. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma [in Ukrainian].

Rogers, C. (1990). Tvorchestvo kak usilenie sebja [Creativity as an enhancement of oneself]. Voprosy psihologii – Questions on psychology, 1, 134–168 [in Russian].

Shchedrovickij, G. P. (1974). Kommunikacija, dejatel’nost’, refleksija. Issledovanie reche-myslitel’noj dejatel’nosti [Communication, activity, reflection. The study of speech and thought activity]. Alma-Ata, 19–28 [in Russian].

Yatsiuryk, A. O. (2014). Psykholohichni chynnyky rozvytku kreatyvnosti pidlitkiv v diialnosti z chytannia poetychnykh tvoriv [Psychological factors of the development of teenagers’ creativity in the activity of reading poetry]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv : Instytut psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian].

Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. Holt : Rinehart and Winston.

Gruber, H. (1988). Inching our way up Mount Olympus: the evolving systems approach to creative thinking. In ed. R. Sternberg: The nature of creativity. Cambridge.

Guilford, J. P. (1967). Measurement of creativity. Exploration in creativity. New-York.

Kubie, L. S. (1958). Neurotic distortion of the creative process. University of Kansas Press.

May, R. (1975). The courage to create. New-York.

Mednich, S. A. (1969). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 2, 220–232.

Rose, G. (1992). The power of form: A psychoanalytic approach to aesthetic form. Madison : International University Press.

Starkweather, E. K. (1976). Creativity research instruments designed for use with preschool children. Assessing creative growth: the 1-st test-book. A. M. Biondi, S. J. Parties (Eds.). Buffalo, New-York : Creative Education Foundation.

Stokes, P. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 555–556.

Published

2019-03-30

How to Cite

Рудзевич, І., & Яцюрик, А. (2019). Personal Сorrelates of Сreativity of Teenagers. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (44), 298–321. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-44.298-321