The Features of Reflexivity Development, Depended on Pupils’ Personal Efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-44.368-394Keywords:
reflexion, reflexivity, personal efficiency, intra-psychic reflexion, inter-psychic reflexion, psychological mechanismAbstract
The article examines reflexion as a determinant factor in personality formation that ensures activity successfulness, and reflexivity as a mechanism for personal efficiency formation. Reflexion is defined as an integrative property and a mechanism that enables a personality to realize and assess personal subjective qualities, to analyze personal «Me», to set new goals on the basis of personal meaningful assessments of own potentials, and, in conjunction with these goals, adjust adequately the perception of oneself and personal attitudes toward people around. The article describes the modern meta-cognitiveinterpretations of reflexion as a rethinking of the contents of consciousness, which has regulatory functions. The article analyzes data obtained from the experimental research on the types and properties of reflexivity, according to the criterion of its orientation (intra- and inter-psychic), characteristic for pupils with different efficiency during their transition from junior school age to adolescence. Pupils with high personal efficiency at stable, «uncritical» periods of school life demonstrate a sufficiently successful mastery of the ability to self-analysis, self-understanding, and understanding of their attitudes to others. At the same time, it has been found that the transitional periods (from primary to secondary school, from junior school age to adolescence) and the periods of adaptation show appearance of destructive tendencies, «blocking», and a decrease in the rate of reflexivity development, especially in the groups of low-efficiency pupils. The article proves that pupils’ intra-psychic reflexion is developed more intensively and constructively than inter-psychic during the period from the 3rd to 6th school years. This general tendency is observed in both groups of pupils: with low and with high personal efficiency. The development of intra-psychic reflexion is intensified at the transition to adolescence, as evidenced by an increased number of indicators showing average and higher than the average levels of this type of reflection, especially in groups of pupils with average and high-efficient levels.References
Anisimova, O. M. (2013). Samoponimanie – vazhnejshij aspekt sub’ektnosti [Self-understanding is the most important aspect of subjectivity]. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko (Eds.). Chelovek, sub’ekt, lichnost’ v sovremennoj psihologii – Person, subject, personality in modern psychology: Proceedings of the International Conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of A. V. Brushlinsky, 2, 121–124. Moskva : Izd-vo IP RAN [in Russian].
Hulias, I. A. (2018). Zhyttievyi uspikh yak sotsialno-psykholohichnyi fenomen [Life success as a socio-psychological phenomenon]. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 42, 69–78. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma. DOI 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-41.69-78 [in Ukrainian].
Dryhus, M. T. (2017). Kontseptualni paradyhmy samoefektyvnosti osobystosti [Conceptual paradigms of self-efficacy of personality]. Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Actual problems of psychology: Collection of research papers of G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 23, XVII, 88–97. Kyiv : Vydavnytstvo «Feniks» [in Ukrainian].
Zaika, Ye. V., & Zimovin, O. I. (2014). Refleksyvnist osobystosti yak predmet psykholohichnoho piznannia [Reflexivity of the personality as an object of psychological knowledge]. Psykholohiia i suspilstvo – Psychology and Society, 2, 90–97 [in Ukrainian].
Ivashkevych, Е., & Onufriieva, L. (2018). Social Intelligence in the Paradigm of Cognitive Psychology: the Results of Study. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: Collection of the research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 42, 50–69. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma. DOI 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-42.50-69.
Ilina, Yu. M. (2009). Naukovyi ohliad problematyky uspikhu ta uspishnosti [Scientific review of the problems of success and successful]. S. D. Maksymenko, M. L. Smulson (Eds.). Aktualni problemy psykholohii: Psykholohichna teoriia i tekhnolohiia navchannia – Actual problems of psychology: Psyhological Theory and Learning Technology, 8, 6, 98–112. Kyiv : Vydavnytstvo NPU imeni M. P. Drahomanova [in Ukrainian].
Karpov, A. V. (2013). Zakonomernosti organizacii metakognitivnyh i metareguljativnyh processov v strukture refleksii [Patterns of the organization of metacognitive and metaregulative processes in the structure of reflexion]. A. L. Zhuravlev, E. A. Sergienko (Eds.). Chelovek, sub’ekt, lichnost’ v sovremennoj psihologii – Person, subject, personality in modern psychology: Proceedings of the International Conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of A. V. Brushlinsky, 2, 169–173. Moskva : Izd-vo IP RAN [in Russian].
Karpov, A. V., & Skitjaeva, I. M. (2002). Psihologija refleksii [Psychology of Reflexion]. Moskva – Jaroslavl’ : Avers Press [in Russian].
Kondratenko, L. O. (2017). Psykholohiia pervynnoi shkilnoi neuspishnosti [Psychology of primary school failure]. Chernihiv : Desna Polihraf [in Ukrainian].
Leont‘ev, D. A. (2009). Refleksija kak predposylka samodeterminacii [Reflexion as a prerequisite for self-determination]. A. L. Zhuravlev (Ed.). Psihologija cheloveka v sovremennom mire: materialy Vserossijskoj jubilejnoj nauchnoj konferencii, posvjashchennoj 120-letiju so dnja rozhdenija S. L. Rubinshtejna – Human psychology in the modern world: Proceedings of the All-Russian jubilee scientific conference dedicated to the 120th anniversary of the birth of S. L. Rubinstein, 2, 40–49. Moskva : Izd-vo IP RAN [in Russian].
Litvinov, A. V., & Ivolina, T. V. (2013). Metakognicija: ponjatie, struktura, svjaz’ s intellektual’nymi kognitivnymi sposobnostjami [Metacognition: Concept, structure, association with intellect and cognitive processes]. Sovremennaja zarubezhnaja psihologija – Modern foreign psychology, 3, 59–70. Retrieved from http://psychlib.ru/mgppu/periodica/SZP032013/szp-0591.htm#$p59 [in Russian].
Maksymenko, S. D. (2006). Heneza zdiisnennia osobystosti [Genesis of Personality]. Kyiv : Vydavnytstvo TOV «KMM» [in Ukrainian].
Maksymenko, S. D. (2018). Mekhanizmy rozvytku osobystosti [Mechanisms of personality development]. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 40, 7–23. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma. DOI 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-40.7-23 [in Ukrainian].
Maksymenko, S. D. (2011). Psykholohichni mekhanizmy stanovlennia ta zdiisnennia osobystosti [Psychological mechanisms of the formation and implementation of personality]. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kos tiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 11, 3–11. Kamia nets-Podilskyi : Aksioma [in Ukrainian].
Musiiaka, N. I. (2018). Rozvytok tvorchoho myslennia yak osobystisnoi determinanty navchalnykh dosiahnen molodshykh shkoliariv [Development of creative thinking as a personal determinant of primary schoolchildren’s educational achievements]. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykholohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of modern psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of NAPS of Ukraine, 41, 205–217. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Aksioma. DOI 10.32626/2227-6246.2018-41.205-217 [in Ukrainian].
Ball, H. O., Dryhus, M. T., Musiiaka, N. I., & Yavorska-Vietrova, I. V. (2015). Stanovlennia osobystisnoi efektyvnosti uchniv v ontohenetychnomu vymiri [Formation of personal effectiveness of students in the ontogenetic dimension]. M. T. Dryhus (Ed.). Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka [in Ukrainian].
Tatenko, V. O. (2005). Subiektno-vchynkova tradytsiia v reformuvanni osvity [Subjective-action paradigm in reforming education]. S. D. Maksymenko (Ed.). Teoretyko-metodolohichni problemy rozvytku osobystosti v systemi neperervnoi osvity: Materialy metodolohichnoho seminaru APN Ukrainy – Theoretical and methodological problems of personality development in the system of continuous education: Proceedings of the methodological seminar of the AES of Ukraine, 248–256. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Fenina, O. Ya. (2017). Problema refleksii ta reflektyvnosti osobystosti u stanovlenni profesiinoho samomenedzhmentu [The problem of reflexion and reflectiveness of personality in the development of professional self-management]. Psykholohiia: realnist i perspektyvy: Zbirnyk naukovukh prats RDHU – Psychology: Reality and Prospects: Collection of research papers of RDNU, 8, 286–291 [in Ukrainian].
Furman, A. V. (2017). Svidomist yak peredumova psykholohichnoho piznannia i profesiinoho metodolohuvannia [Consciousness as a prerequisite for psychological knowledge and professional methodology]. Nauka i osvita. Psykholohiia – Science and education. Psychology, 3, 5–10. DOI http://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-3-1 [in Ukrainian].
Karelin, A. (Ed.). (1997). Jenciklopedija psihologicheskih testov: Obshchenie, liderstvo, mezhlichnostnye otnoshenija [Encyclopedia of psychological tests: Communication, leadership, interpersonal relations]. Moskva : AST [in Russian].
Forrest, M. E. S. (2008). On becoming a critically reflective practitioner. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 25, Issue 3, 229–232. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2008.00787.x.
Hacker, D. J., Bol, K., & Keener, M. C. (2008). Metacognition in Education: A Focus on Calibration. Handbook of Memory and Metacognition. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.
Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1, 293–307.
Moon, J. (2004). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development: Theory and Practice. London and New York : Routledge Falmer.
Vachon, B., & LeBlanc, J. (2011). Effectiveness of past and current critical incident analysis on reflective learning and practice change. Medical Education, 45, Issue 9, 894–904. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04042x.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
