Certain Theoretical and Methodological Guidance on the Conceptualization of Psychological Health of Contemporary Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-45.203-222Keywords:
psychic health, psychological health, personality, adolescence.Abstract
The expanded scienti0xFB01c knowledge about the essence of any psychological
phenomenon is a signi0xFB01cant background for enhancing of practicallyorien-
tated capacity of the process of modern education directing; the latetr one
being a generally accepted factor of constructive livelihoods of a personality.
If the undeniable meaning of psychological health of a personality lies in his
success, the role of solution of problematic issues, connected with psychologi-
cal health, that is an important integrative feature of a personality throughout
his life, becomes clear.
As a result of conducted analytical work it is stated that so far in psycho-
logical science there has not been clear understanding of the essence of psy-
chological health, the uniqueness of this attribute, particularly in adolescence.
As opposed exactly in this period of life of a person the in0xFB02uence of education
on his psychological health is the most notable, as it regards to personal ca-
reer development during student’s life.
It is concluded that in psychological science the outlines of the theory
of psychological health of students have already been drawn up in the con-
text of the following idea: «a personality is integral, and an integral individual
is personal». Due to the methodological analysis of prediction conducted by
the scientists, established inner lines of psychological development of a perso
nality and interpretation of intentional sphere through recognition of the ne-
cessity by «energetic carrier» (S. Maksymenko), justi0xFB01cation of core aspects
of integralpersonal approach (N. Nepoleniashcha), proving that any psycho-
logical phenomenon is possible to be re0xFB02ected from di0exFB00rent points of view
in the context of typological approach, that provides «growth of theoretical
knowledge» (T. Dancheva) – the basis for establishing the theory of psycho-
logical health of a personality was created. In this regard the fundamental
value of philosophicalpsychological teaching of an act is proved, in the aspect
of which the psychology of youth is taken into consideration (V. Romenets).
The background of the constructive development of psychological health
of students, received as a result of empirical research, particularly abroad,
that aimed to de0xFB01ne practicallyorientated approaches to the improvement of
educational process at high schools, is also taken into consideration.
References
Bekh, I. D. (2019). Osobystist u vikovomu ontohenezi [Personality in age-related ontogenesis]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia – Pedagogy and Psychology, 1, 36–43 [in Ukrainian].
Brushlinskij, A. V. (1994). Problemy psihologii subjekta [Problems on psychology of a subject]. Moskva : Izd-vo In-ta psihologii RAN [in Russian].
Vojtenko, V. P. (1991). Zdorov’e zdorovyh: Vvedenie v sanologiju [Health of Healthy People: An Introduction to Sanology]. Kiev : Zdorov’e [in Russian].
Vygotskij, L. S. (1983). Problema vozrasta [The problem of age]. (Vol. 4). Moskva : Pedagogika [in Russian].
Gatsenko, O. Ja. (2004). Psihologicheskoe zdorov’e i zashchitnye mehanizmy lichnosti [Psychological Health and Protective Mechanisms of Personality]. Nauka i osvita – Science and Education, 3, 33–35 [in Russian].
Hrinova, O. M. (2018). Psykholohiia proektuvannia osobystistiu zhyttievoho shliakhu: yunatskyi vik [Psychology of Designing the Personality’s Life Path: Youth Age]. Vinnytsia : Nilan – LTD [in Ukrainian].
Dancheva, T. D. (2012). Tipologija psihologicheskogo zdorov’ja lichnosti [Typology of Psychological Health of the Individual]. Nauka i osvita – Science and Education, 3, 50–54 [in Russian].
Leont’ev, A. N. (1975). Dejatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activities. Consciousness. Personality]. Moskva : Politizdat [in Russian].
Maksymenko, S. D. (2019). Horyzonty psykholohichnoi nauky XXI stolittia [Horizons of Psychological Science of XXI Century]. Pedahohika i psykholohiia – Pedagogy and Psychology, 1, 44–54 [in Ukrainian].
Maksymenko, S. D. (2019). Dzherela actyvnosti osobystosti [Sources of personality’s activity]. S. D. Maksymenko, L. A. Onufriieva (Eds.). Aktualni problemy psykholohii osobystosti na Yevropeiskomu prostori – Actual Problems of Psychology of Personality in the European Space: Proceedings of IV International scientific practical conference. (pp. 7–11). Kamianets-Podilskyi : Medobory-2006 [in Ukrainian].
Maslow, A. (1997). Dal’nie predely chelovecheskoj psihiki [The Far Limits of the Human Psyche]. Sankt-Peterburg : Evroazija [in Russian].
Nepomnjashchaja, N. I. (2005). Tsennostno-lichnostnyj podhod k izucheniju cheloveka [Value and personality-oriented approach to the study of human]. Voprosy psihologii – Questions on Psychology, 1, 116–125 [in Russian].
Olport, G. (1982). Lichnost v psihologii [Personality in psychology]. Sankt-Peterburg : Juventa [in Russian].
Petrovskij, A. V., & Jaroshevskij, M. G. (1999). Osnovy teoreticheskoj psihologii [Fundamentals of theoretical psychology]. Moskva : INFRA [in Russian].
Prohorov, A. O. (2004). Metodiki diagnostiki i izmerenija psihicheskih sostojanij lichnosti [Methods of Diagnosis and Measurement of Mental States of the Individual]. Moskva : PERSJe [in Russian].
Romenets, V. A. (2004). Psykholohiia tvorchosti [The Psychology of Creativity]. Kyiv : Lybid [in Ukrainian].
Rubinshtejn, S. L. (1976). Problemy obshchej psihologii [Problems of general psychology]. Moskva : Pedagogika [in Russian].
Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskah smysla [Man in Search of Meaning]. L. Ja. Gozman, D. A. Leont’ev (Eds.). Moskva : Progress [in Russian].
Freud, Z. (1989). Psihologija bessoznatel’nogo [The Psychology of the Unconscious]. Moskva : Prosveshchenie [in Russian].
Tsarkova, O. V. (2014). Psykholohichni aspekty zberezhennia psykholohichnoho zdorovia studentskoi molodi [Psychological aspects of preservation of psychological health of student youth]. Nauka i osvita – Science and Education, 6, 128–132 [in Ukrainian].
Pitt, A., Oprescu, F., Tapia, G., & Gray, M. (2018). An exploratory Study of Students’ weekly Stress Levels and Sources of Stress during the Semester. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19, 1, 61–75.
Ramachandiran, M, & Dhanapal, S. (2018). Academic Stress among University Students: A Quantitative Study of Generation Y and Z’s Perception. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 26, 3, 1115–1128.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
