The problem of Professional Growth of a Specialist in a Paradigm of Ratio- Humanistic Psychology of George Ball

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-45.318-337

Keywords:

professional growth, ratio­humanistic psychology, ratio­hu- manistic paradigm, self­development, self­realization, meaningful norms and values, axiopsychological methods of the analysis.

Abstract

In this article the features of the research on the process of professional
growth of a specialist were speci0xFB01ed according to the analysis of contempo-
rary psychological and pedagogical works. The phenomenon of professional
development in the paradigm of ratio­humanistic psychology of George Ball 

was revealed. The author’s own scienti0xFB01c position (taking into account ana-
lyzed ideas of ratio­humanistic psychology) was substantiated, within which it
was necessary to study the process of professional development of a specialist
in accordance with conditions of obtaining higher professional education and
in the process of future professional activity.
It was noted that the relevance of the problem raised in this research was
also determined by the fact that if one considered the professional growth of
a person in the paradigm of a ratio­humanistic approach, then, in the fore-
ground, there were not only processes of personal development, but also the
transformation of the value­semantic foundations of our life, the mechanisms
of life self­determination, etc. It was stressed that these problems were also
very urgent because the ratio­humanistic paradigm required the search for
axiopsychological methods of scienti0xFB01c analysis, which was prerequisite for
scienti0xFB01c explanation of the changes that took a main place in the develop-
ment of the person as a result of the movement of cultural, economic, socio­
political context of people’s existence.
It was determined that ratio­humanistic psychology operated with the
concept, which in science was described as «the world of a concrete person».
The latetr was understood by the author as a «ransitional layer» between
objective and subjective realities. Without understanding and recognizing
that we permanently are close to having knowledge of the mechanisms of
selectivity of mental re0xFB02ection, the way to understand the mechanisms of the
emergence and functioning of human consciousness, which are the basis for
professional growth of the person.
It was noted that the process of professional growth of a future specia­
list was considered as the development of personal potential and resources of
the subject that would promote self­development and self­realization in the
paradigm of universal culture, taking into account the speci0xFB01c conditions of
the professional activity in the process of mastering and reproduction by a
specialist professionally meaningful norms and values.

Author Biography

Людмила Примачок, Scientific Institute of Public Health of National University of Water Management and Nature usage, Rivne

Ph.D. in Pedagogical Sciences, Assistant Professor

References

Ball, G. O., & Papucha, M. V. (2007). Dialohichnist yak forma isnuvannia i rozvytku osobystosti [Dialogism as a form of the existence and the development of the personality]. Nizhyn : Milanik [in Ukrainian].

Ball, G. А. (2014). Sistemnaja traktovka kul’tury i lichnosti v kontekste kontseptsii ratsiogumanizma [Systematic interpretation of culture and personality in the context of the concept of racio-humanism]. Nauka i osvita – Science and education, 9/CXXVI, 26–31 [in Russian].

Brutjan, G. A. (1973). Jazyk i kartina mira [Language and the image of world]. Nauch. doklady vyssh. shk. filosof. nauki – Scientific reports of higher school of philosophical science, 1, 84–112 [in Russian].

Volobuieva, O. F. (2014). Profesiina diialnist suchasnoho vykladacha vyshchoi shkoly: vyklyky ta priorytety [Professional activity of a teacher of a contemporary high school: challenges and priorities]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademii Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy – Collection of research works of the National Academy of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine. Series: Pedagogical and psychological sciences, 4, 392–406. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/znpnapv_ppn_2014_4_36 [in Ukrainian].

Vygotskij, L. S. (1982). Problema soznanija (zapis’ osnovnyh polozhenij doklada L. S. Vygotskogo) [The problem of consciousness (recording of the main points of the report done by L. S. Vygotskyi)], 1, 156–167. Moskva : Pedagogika [in Russian].

Hriandis, H. (2019). Kulturo-spetsyfichnyi treninh [Cultural specific training]. Retrieved from https://www.sspu.sumy.ua/index.php?option=com_content& [in Ukrainian].

Kalmykova, L. A., & Kalmykov, G. V. (2015). Kontseptual’nye podhody k sovershenstvovaniju psihologicheskoj podgotovki budushchih pedagogov [Conceptual approaches to improving the psychological training of future teachers]. Materialy konf. «Pedagogika i psihologija kak resurs razvitija sovremennogo obshchestva: problemy setevogo vzaimodejstvija v inkljuzivnom obrazovanii» – Proceedings of the conference «Pedagogy and psychology as a resource for the development of modern society: problems of network interaction in inclusive education»]. (pp. 238–243) [in Russian].

Karpenko, Z. S. (1998). Aksiopsykholohiia osobystosti [Axiopsychology of the personality]. Kyiv : ТОV «Міzhnаrоdnа fіnаnsоvа аhеntsіia» [in Ukrainian].

Kostjuk, G. S. (1994). Printsip razvitija v psihologii [The principle of the development in psychology]. Moskva : MGU [in Russian].

Levin, K. (2000). Teorija polja v sotsial’nyh naukah [Field Theory in Social Sciences]. Sankt-Peterburg : Rech’ [in Russian].

Leont’ev, A. N. (1977). Dejatel’nost’. Soznanie. Lichnost’ [Activity. Consciousness. Personality]. Moskva : Politizdat [in Russian].

Lomov, B. F. (1975). O sistemnom podhode v psihologii [About the system approach in зsychology]. Voprosy psihologii – Issues on Psychology, 2, 94 [in Russian].

Mykhalchuk, N. O. (2012). Psykholohiia chytannia ta rozuminnia literaturnykh tvoriv starshoklasnykamy [Psychology of reading and understanding of novels by senior pupils]. Kyiv : ТОV «Priynt Khauz» [in Ukrainian].

Mykhalchuk, N. O., & Ivashkevych, E. Z. (2018). Psykholinhvistychne opanuvannia chytatskoi diialnosti yak aksiolohichnoho protsesu [Psycholinguistic mastering of readership as an axiological process]. Materialy Vseukrainskoi (z mizhnarodnoiu uchastiu) nauk.-pr. konferentsii «Suchasni sotsiokulturni ta psykholoho-pedahohichni koordynaty rozvytku dytyny» – Proceedings of all-Ukrainian (with international participation) scientific conference «Modern socio-cultural and psychological and pedagogical coordinates of child’s develop-ment». (pp. 104–107). Ternopil [in Ukrainian].

Onufriieva, L. A. (2013). Doslidzhennia psykholohichnykh determinant rozvytku profesiinoi samosvidomosti ta osobystisnoi zrilosti maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnykh profesii [Research on psychological determinants of the development of professional self-consciousness and personal maturity of future specialists of sociological professions]. S. D. Maksymenko, N. O. Evdokimova (Eds.). Naukovyi visnyk Mykolaivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni V. O. Sukhomlynskoho – Scientific Newsletter of Mykolaiv V.O. Sukhomlynskyi State University. Series «Psychological Sciences», 2, Vol. 10 (91), 227–233. Mykolaiv [in Ukrainian].

Semenov, I. N. (1995). Refleksivno-tvorcheskij podhod v nepreryvnom professional’nom obrazovanii [Reflexive-creative approach in continuous professional education]. Bijsk : BGPI [in Russian].

Sobchik, L. N. (1998). Vvedenie v psihologiju individual’nosti [Introduction into the psychology of individuality]. Moskva : Institut prikladnoj psihologii [in Russian]

Jel’konin, D. B. (1989). Izbrannye psihologicheskie trudy [Selected psychological researches]. V. V. Davydova, V. P. Zinchenko (Eds.). Moskva : Pedagogika [in Russian].

Knapp, A. (1975). Über den Lernerforlg im Kleingruppen Unterrichtund seine bedingten Faktoren. Frankfurt : Frankfurt am Main [in German].

Korporowicz, L. (1993). Tworzenie sensu: jezyk – kultura – komunikacja. Warszawa : W-two «Oficyna naukowa Warszawa» [in Polish].

Lakin, M. (1972). Interpersonal encounter. Theory and practice in sencitizity training. New York : Penguin Books.

Lazarus, R. S., & Arnold, W. J. (1968). Emotion and adaptation: Conceptual and empirical relations. Nebraska Symposium on Novigation. New York : Penguin Books.

Published

2019-04-25

How to Cite

Примачок, Л. (2019). The problem of Professional Growth of a Specialist in a Paradigm of Ratio- Humanistic Psychology of George Ball. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (45), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-45.318-337