Contemporary Leadership Theories: Humanistic Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-47.9-26

Keywords:

leadership, leadership theories, humanistic leadership theories, servant leadership, resonant leadership, authentic leadership, emotional intelligence, total leadership.

Abstract

Basic concepts of leadership that emerged in the late XX – early XXI centuries are
analyzed in the article. The role and position of a leader in accordance with the
team he / she leads is examined. The aim of the article is to identify theoretical
aspects of the leadership phenomenon. To identify the peculiarities of the
phenomenon, special attention is paid to the theories of humanistic direction.
In the realization of the purpose of this article the theoretical methods
of research were used: analysis of psychological literature; systematization,
generalization, structuring of data of theoretical concepts.
The results of the research suggest that it has been determined that
effective leader mediates between the organization and the individual in order to
ensure the achievements of the company and meet the needs of the individual in
growth and self-development (C. Argyris), demonstrate empathy, attentiveness 

in the perception of new information, the ability to respond to it and depends on
the development of emotional intelligence (D. Goleman, R. Boyatzis, A. McKee),
care for needs of his followers, serve them and help in achieving individual and
team goals (R. Greenleaf). It has been researched that Uniqueness, authenticity,
leadership presence are the keys to successful leadership in the model by
J. Scouller. These qualities of a leader are also underlined by B. George and
S. Friedman.
As a conclusion the necessity of conducting empirical research to observe
advantages of contemporary leadership theories are noted and the importance
of determining peculiarities of leadership qualities development in schoolchildren
are stated.

Author Biography

Марія Вижва, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Kyiv

Postgraduate Student, Department of Psychology

References

Antonakis, J., & Eubanks, D. L. (2017). Looking Leadership in the Face. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 270–275.

Argyris, C. (1990). Integrating the Individual and the Organization. New York : Routledge.

Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1974). Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. San-Francisco, California : Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York : The Free Press.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (Eds.). (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.

Bass, B. M., & Stogdill, R. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. New York : Free Press.

Bennis, W., & Thomas, R. (2007). Leading for a Lifetime: How Defining Moments Shape Leaders of Today and Tomorrow. Boston, Massachusetts : Harvard Business Review Press.

Blake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1982). Theory and Research for Developing a Science of Leadership. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18 (3), 275–291.

Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant Leadership: Renewing Yourself and Connecting with Others Through Mindfulness, Hope, and Compassion. Boston, Massachusetts : Harvard Business Review Press.

Covey, S. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People. New York : Free Press.

Dansereau, F. Jr., Graen, G. B., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46–78.

De Pree, M. (1987). Leadership is an Art. East Lansing, MI : Michigan State University Press.

Fiedler, F. E. (1972). The Effects of Leadership Training and Experience: A Contingency Model Interpretation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (4), 453–470.

Frankl, V. (2011). The Unheard Cry for Meaning. Psychotherapy and Humanism. New York : Simon & Schuster.

Frick, D. (2013). Implementing Servant Leadership: Stories from the Field La Crosse, WI : D. B. Reinhart Institute for Ethics in Leadership.

Friedman, S. D. (2014). Leading the life you want: skills for integrating work and life. Boston, Massachusetts : Harvard Business Review Press.

Gardner, J. (1989). Leadership Development. NASSP Bulletin, 73 (515), 73.

George, B. (2003). Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Last Value. San-Francisco, California : Jossey-Bass Publisher.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2013). Primal leadership: Unleashing the power of emotional intelligence. Boston, Massachusetts : Harvard Business Review Press.

Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 6 (2), 219–247.

Greenleaf, R. (2008). Servant as a Leader. Atlanta, GA : Greenleaf Center for Servant Leadership.

Heifetz, R. (1998). Leadership Without Easy Answers. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.

Hernez-Broome, G. (2004). Leadership development: Past, present, and future. Retrieved from http://pdfrelease.net/external/1728589/pdf-release-dot-netleadership%20development.pdf.

Hill, S. K. (2010). Team Leadership. Leadership: Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.

Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1969). Contemporary trends in the analysis of leadership processes. Psychological Bulletin, 71 (5), 387–397.

Hollander, E. P., & Julian, J. W. (1970). Studies in Leader Legitimacy, Influence, and Innovation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 33–69.

Keith, K. (2012). The Case for Servant Leadership. South Orange, NJ : The Center for Servant Leadership.

Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2003). The Leadership Challenge. Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons.

Likert, R. (1961). An Emerging Theory of Organization, Leadership, and Management. Leadership and interpersonal behavior. New York : Holt, Reinhart & Winston.

Mango, E. (2018). Rethinking Leadership Theories. Open Journal of Leadership, 7, 57–88. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4236/ojl.2018.71005.

Maslow, A. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York : Harper.

May, R. (1996). Psychology and the Human Dilemma. New York : WW Norton & Company.

McGregor, D. (1966). Leadership and motivation. Cambridge, MA : M. I. T. Press.

Pearce, С. L., Conger, J. A., & Locke, A. (2008). Shared leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 19 (5), 622–628.

Rogers, C. (1951). Client-Centered Therapy: Its Current Practice, Implications and Theory. London : Constable.

Rosenbach, W. E. (2018). Contemporary Issues in Leadership. New York, NY : Routledge.

Scouller, J. (2016). The Three Levels of Leadership: How to Develop Your Leadership Presence, Knowhow and Skill. Oxford : Management Books 2000

Sergiovanni, T. J. (1996). Moral Leadership: Getting to the Heart of School Improvement. Hoboken : John Wiley & Sons.

Spiers, L. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership, 1, 25–30.

Stogdill, R. M. (1948). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology, 25, 35–71.

Uchiyama, K. P., & Wolf, S. A. (2002). The Best Way to Lead Them. Educational Leadership, 59 (8), 80–83.

Watt, W. M. (2009). Facilitative social change leadership theory: 10 recommendations toward effective leadership. Retrieved from http://leadershipeducators.org/Resources/Documents/jole/2009_fall/Watt.pdf.

Winkler, I. (2010). Contemporary Leadership Theories: Enhancing the Understanding of the Complexity, Subjectivity and Dynamic of Leadership. Berlin, Germany : Physica-Verlag Heidelberg.

Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 10 (2), 285–305.

Published

2020-01-24

How to Cite

Вижва, М. (2020). Contemporary Leadership Theories: Humanistic Perspective. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (47), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-47.9-26