The Strategies of Psychological Richness of Personality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-48.313-338Keywords:
strategies of psychological richness of personality, psychological resources, systemic reflection, possibilities of life self-fulfillment, wisdom, strategizing of psychological richness of personality.Abstract
The aim of the article is empirical identification of the strategies of psychological
richness of personality.
Methods of the study. The psychological survey is applied including the
following techniques: personal resourcefulness questionnaire, psychological
resourcefulness questionnaire, diagnostic questionnaire of existential resources
indicators, virtue and strength of character questionnaire, crisis coping
questionnaire,
psychological well-being questionnaire, methods of assessment
and prediction of psychological development of situations of interpersonal
interaction. The methods of mathematical and statistical analysis, like one-way
ANOVA, cluster analysis, classification analysis have been used. The research
was implemented using the Goldmark’s model, which involved alternative
hypotheses and determined the practical and theoretical significance of the
results of the research. The methods of verification and interpretation have been
implemented.
The results of the research. According to the results of verification the
following strategies of psychological richness are singled out: personality
perfectness, personality maturity, existential perfectness, existential motivation,
basic beliefs. The hardiness is shown to be doubtfully defined as the strategy
of the psychological richness of personality. According to the results of
the classification analysis, it is determined that the strategy of personality
perfectness implies the possibilities of life self-fulfillment of personality (the
predictor’s rank is 100%). The analysis of the correlation between strategies of
personality’s psychological richness in the structure of personal self-fulfillment
proves the strategy of personality’s perfectness is only 5%, while the strategy
of existential fulfillment is 55%, and its predictor’s rank is 23%. The results of
classification analysis using the k-averages method showed, that there were two
types of opportunities for personal self-fulfillment that differed in terms of the
strategy of existential fulfillment.
Conclusions. The strategies of psychological richness of personality are
characterized as a reflexively predetermined distribution of psychological factors
in the areas of intentional experience, encompassed by wisdom of a man. The
empirical indicators of strategies of personality’s psychological richness are the
systemic reflection, wisdom, psychological resources of personality. Each of the
defined strategies is interpreted to characterize certain functions in the person’s
reflective image of his / her own possible life self-fulfillment. The characteristics of
the functions of psychological richness of personality are relevant for predicting
and analyzing the effectiveness of productive functioning of personality.
References
Иванова Т., Леонтьев Д., Осин Е., Рассказова Е., Кошелева Н. Совре-менные проблемы изучения личностных ресурсов в профессио¬нальной деятельности. Организационная психология. 2018. Т. 8, № 1. С. 85–121. URL : https://www.orgpsyjournal.hse.ru.
Капустин С. А. Вклад У. Джемса в представления о личности как пси-хологической реальности. Национальный психологический жур¬нал. 2017. № 1 (25). С. 62– 69. DОІ 10.11621/npj.2017.01.08.
Квинт В. Л. Поиск и исследование философских корней теории стра¬тегии. Взаимосвязь философского и стратегического мышления. Управленческое консультирование. 2016. № 1. С. 15–21.
Леонтьев Д. А. Перспективы неклассической психодиагностики. Пси-хологические исследования: электронный научный журнал. 2010. № 4 (12). URL : http://psystudy.ru.0421000116/0031.
Леонтьев Д. А. Развитие личности в норме и в затрудненных условиях. Культурно-историческая психология. 2014. Т. 10, № 3. С. 97–106.
Леонтьев Д. А. Саморегуляция, ресурсы и личностный потенциал. Си-бирский психологический журнал. 2016. № 62. С. 18–37.
Низовских Н. А. Человек как автор самого себя: психосемантическое исследование личностного развития: монография. Москва – Бер¬лин : Директ-Медиа, 2014. 405 с.
Прохоров А. О., Артищева Л. В. Образ психического состояния: ди-намические и структурные характеристики. Экспериментальная психология. 2012. Т. 5, № 2. С. 63–73.
Пушкарев Ю. И. Личность как субъект адаптации и субъект интерпре-тации: системно-герменевтический подход к изучению личности: монография. Белгород : ИД «Белгород», 2012. 209 с.
Рязанцева О. Ю. Экзистенциальные ресурсы лиц, переживающих пси-хологический кризис: дис. … канд. психол. наук: 19.00.01. Одес¬са : Ужноукраинский национальный педагогический университет имени К. Д. Ушинского, 2012. 343 с.
Савчин М. Здатності особистості: монографія. Київ : ВЦ «Академія», 2016. 288 с.
Титов И. Г. Принципы постнеклассической психологии. Теоретичні до-слідження у психології: монографічна серія / укл. В. О. Мєдінцев. 2019. Т. VII. С. 150–176. DOI 10.24411/2616-6860-2019-00005.
Хазова С. А. Ментальные ресурсы субъекта: природа, функции, дина¬мика. Педагогика. Психология. Социальная работа. Ювенология. Социокинетика. Вестник КГУ им. Н. А. Некрасова. 2014. Т. 20, № 41. С. 47–53.
Черникова И. B. Постнеклассическая наука и философия процесса. Томск : Изд-во НТЛ, 2007. 252 с.
Штепа О. С. Ресурсна насиченість особистості. Проблеми сучасної пси-хології: зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України / за наук. ред. С. Д. Максимен¬ка, Л. А. Онуфрієвої. Кам’янець-Подільський : ТОВ «Друкарня «Рута», 2020. Вип. 47. C. 231–252. URL : doi.org/10.32626/2227- 6246.2020-47.231-252.
Як будувати власне майбутнє: життєві завдання особистості: наук. мо-нографія / за наук. ред. Т. М. Титаренко; Національна академія педагогічних наук України, Інститут соціальної та політичної психології. Кіровоград : Імекс-ЛТД, 2012. 512 с.
Collis, David J., & Rukstad, Michael J. (2008). Can you say what your strategy is? Harvard Business Review. April. (Reprint R0804E), (рр. 1–10). URL : www.hbr.org.
May, R. (1969). Love and Will. New York : W. W. Norton & Co. 352 p. URL : http://goodreads.com.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
