Social and Psychological Factors of Civic Identity Formation of an Individual
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.269-295Keywords:
civic identity, factors of formation, prosociality, subjectivity, social integration.Abstract
The aim of the article is the empirical substantiation of socio-psychological factors of the formation of civic identity of the personality.
The following research methods were used: survey, questionnaires for determining the level and the type of civic identity, the value orientations of the personality, the level of social frustration, social activity. The methods of mathematical-statistical analysis like one-way analysis of variance, multivariate analysis, discriminant analysis, regression analysis were applied. The empirical study involved 350 citizens of Ukraine in the age of 30-50, 119 (34%) of whom were men, 231 (66%) – women.
The results of the research. It was found out that the main socio-psychological factors of civic identity formation at its different stages were: basic interpersonal needs (inclusion, affect, trust in relationships), basic beliefs (benevolence of the world, justice of the world, self-value), collectivist values of the family, civic attitudes and behavioral patterns of reference persons, orientation on sociocentric values, social integration, subjectivity of the personality, prosocial orientation and satisfaction of the needs of the person’s physical and social existence in the state.
Conclusions. The formation of civic identity of personality is significantly influenced by: the subjective experience of the ability for a citizen to satisfy his / her vital needs in the state, to protect his/her interests, rights and freedom from various illegal encroachments and threats of any kind, as well as feelings, that the state is able to provide all conditions for self-realization and well-being of the person; readiness of the person to unite and to cooperate with other compatriots in order to improve the well-being of the state and its citizens, a desire to help and support others; the ability to be active, initiative, responsible, as well as conscious attitude towards the world; value orientations of the personality, which lead to interaction with the world in a prosocial way; social integration, which contributes to the formation of a sense of «We», the sense of unity and solidarity with fellow citizens; values of the family, based on strong social ties and collective performance of social duties, what causes the development of social cohesion; civic attitudes and behavioral patterns of reference of persons, on which the establishment of one or another level of respect for the state, state language and state symbols is based, the formation of basic elements (positive or negative) of awareness and acceptance / rejection of state and public values, tendency to take active or passive / indifferent civic position; the way which is based on interpersonal needs being satisfied in the childhood, which affected the formation of one or another type of a citizen; basic beliefs, which affect the formation of civic beliefs, the assessment of the person’s «social value», and the importance of the man as a member of the society, as they are the basis for the implementation of acts of value choices.
References
Анцыферова Л. И. Психологическое содержание феномена «субъект» и границы субъектно-деятельностного подхода. Проблема субъекта в психологической науке. Москва : Академический проект, 2000. С. 27–42.
Вассерман Л. И., Иовлев Б. В., Беребин М. А. Методика для психоло¬гической диагностики уровня социальной фрустрированности и её практическое применение. Пособие для врачей и клинических психологов. Санкт-Петербург, 2004. 28 с.
Волкова Е. Н. Субъектность как деятельное отношение к самому себе, к другим людям и к миру. Мир психологии. 2005. № 3. С. 35–40.
Конфисахор А. Г. Психология власти. Санкт-Петербург : Издательский дом «Питер», 2004. 234 с.
Концепція розвитку громадянської освіти України. URL : https:// zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/710-2018-р.
Корчакова Н. В. Вікова генеза просоціальності особистості: дис. … д-ра психол. наук: 19.00.07. Київ, 2018. 476 с.
Микляєва А. В. Шкала самооценки личностной зрелости: опыт разра¬ботки и апробации. Современные исследования социальных проблем. 2017. Т. 8, № 2. С. 52–68.
Падун М. А., Котельникова А. В. Модификация методики исследова¬ния базисных убеждений личности Р. Янофф-Бульмана. Психоло¬гический журнал. 2008. № 4 (29). С. 98–106.
Петровский В. А. Личность в психологии. Парадигма субъектности. Ростов-на-Дону : Феникс, 1996. 440 с.
Рукавишников А. А. Опросник межличностных отношений. Ярос¬лавль : НПЦ «Психодиагностика», 1992. 47 с.
Семків І. І. Адаптація методики Ш. Шварца «Портрет цінностей» укра¬їнською мовою. Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2013. № 1. С. 12–28.
Татенко В. А. Психология в субъектном измерении: монография. Киев : Просвита, 1996. 404 с.
Фаріон М., Ковч В. Можливості та роль держави в задоволенні потреб суспільства за умов формування інноваційної економіки. Галиць¬кий економічний вісник. 2013. № 3 (42). С. 53–60.
Хазратова Н. В. Еволюція громадянської ідентичності в умовах постра¬дянської України. Психосоціальний вимір буття особистості в сучасному суспільстві: Зб. тез доп. Міжнар. наук.-практ. конф. (м. Львів, 20–22 квіт. 2016 р.). Львів, 2016. С. 72–76.
Хазратова Н. В. Психологія відносин особистості й держави: автореф. дис. … д-ра психол. наук: 19.00.05. Луцьк, 2005. 36 с.
Четверик-Бурчак А. Г. Опис та адаптація опитувальника «Шкала соці¬ального благополуччя» К. Кіза. Вісник Харківського національ¬ного університету. Серія «Психологія». 2014. № 1099. С. 28–33.
Чолій С. М. Мотиваційно-ціннісний аспект соціальної активності моло¬ді. Проблеми сучасної психології: Збірник наукових праць Кам’я¬нець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієн¬ка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. 2010. № 10. С. 809–822.
Эрхард Л. Благосостояние для всех. Москва : Начала-Пресс, 1991. С. 230–231.
Anan, R., & Barnett, D. (1999). Perceived social support mediates between prior attachment and subsequent adjustment. Developmental Psy¬chology, 35, 1210–1222.
Gest, S. D., Graham-Bermann, S. A., & Hartup, W. W. (2001). Peer expe¬rience: Common and unique features of number of friendships, social network centrality, and sociometric status. Social Development, 10, 23–40.
Petrovska, I. R. (2019). Measuring Civic Identity: Difficulties and Solu¬tion. Psychology and pedagogy in XXI century: methodological framework of the activities of psychologist and educator: collective monograph. Lviv – Toruń : Liha-Pres. P. 62–82.
Romig, C., & Bakken, L. (1992). Intimacy development in middle adoles¬cence: Its relationship to gender and family cohesion and adaptabili¬ty. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 325–338.
Schonert-Reichl, K. A. (1999). Relations of peer acceptance, friendship adjustment, and social behavior to moral reasoning during early adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 249–279.
Twenge, J., Baumeister, R., DeWall, C., Ciarocco, N., & Bartels, J. (2007). Social exclusion decreases prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (1), 56–66.
Wentzel, K. R., & McNamara, C. C. (1999). Interpersonal relationships, emotional distress, and prosocial behavior in middle school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 114–125.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
