Psychological Principles of the Attributes of Facilitative Interaction

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-50.267-288

Keywords:

facilitation, facilitative interaction, facilitative teaching, the activity, the subject of the activity, the functions of the subject, the purpose of the activity, ways of performing the activity.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to define the attributes of facilitation, to propose the functions of facilitation, to provide the process of facilitative teaching at secondary schools which is based on the heuristic conversation, to identify additional principles that are specific for the system of secondary education.

Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization.

The results of the research. There were distinguished the attributes of facilitation: 1) the activity; 2) the subject of the activity; 3) functions of the subject; 4) functions of the activity; 5) motives of the activity; 6) the purpose of the activi ty; 7) ways of performing the activity; 8) the subject of the activity; 9) methods of realization of the activity; 10) means which are relevant to the implementation of the activity; 11) the result of the activity. Also we proposed the functions of facilitation: the function of stimulation; the function of actualization; the function of forming the sovereignty of the pupils’ person; providing of control for educational process; the function of interaction; the function of creative educational environment.

Conclusions. The process of facilitative teaching at secondary schools is based on general psychological principles (scientific ones, which provide the connection of learning with life, proposed differentiated approaches for pupils). However, we can identify additional principles that are specific for the system of secondary education: the principle of actualizing social and personal needs in the process of secondary education; the principle of the relationships between learning and self-education during the organization of the educational process and in the period of pupils’ holidays; the principle of interconnection of studying with future professional activity (based on the content and nature of the functional responsibilities of teachers); the principle of interrelation of education with personally and professionally significant experience of the teacher, awareness of the acquired experience as personally significant one; the principle of interdisciplinary approach to the construction of the content of the educational process (actualizing facilitative potential of different disciplines, their impact on the study of this or that subject); the principle of establishing the relationships between the educational process and continuous of self-education; the principle of updating the subject-subject learning of pupils, providing the creative search for solutions of management problems, independent development of pupils’ projects, presentations with the aim of improving their own learning activities.

Author Biography

Наталія Хупавцева, Rivne State University of the Humanities, Rivne

Ph.D. in Psychology, Assistant Professor

References

Максименко С., Ткач Б., Литвинчук Л., Онуфрієва Л. Нейропсихолінгвістичне дослідження політичних гасел із зовнішньої реклами. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics. 2019. Вип. 26 (1). С. 246–264. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1- 246-264. URL : https://psycholing-journal.com/index.php/journal/ article/view/715.

Хупавцева Н. О. Facilitation as a Personality-Centered Approach at the English lessons at secondary schools. Проблеми сучасної психології: Зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Кам’янець-Подільський : ТОВ «Друкарня «Рута», 2020. Вип. 47. С. 206–230.

Athanasopoulos, P., Bylund, E., Montero-Melis, G., Damjanovic, L., Schartner, A., & Kibbe, A. (2015). Two languages, two minds. Psychological Science, 26 (4), 518–526. URL : https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0956797614567509.

Delong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Language and Linguistics Compass, 8 (12), 631–645. URL : https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12093.

Elahi Shirvan, M., Khajavy, G. H., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). A Meta-analysis of L2 Willingness to Communicate and Its Three High- Evidence Correlates. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 1241– 1267. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09656-9.

Feinmann, D. (2020). Language and Thought in the Motion Domain: Methodological Considerations and New Empirical Evidence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 1–29. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10936-019-09668-5.

Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time: Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34 (8), 1430–1451. URL : https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01105.x.

Hu, Z., & Liu, H. (2019). The Affective Meaning of Words is Constrained by the Conceptual Meaning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 1377–1390. URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09663-w.

Mykhalchuk, N., & Ivashkevych, E. (2019). Psycholinguistic Characteristics of Secondary Predication in Determining the Construction of a Peculiar Picture of the World of a Reader. Психолінгвістика. Психолингвистика. Psycholinguistics. Вип. 25 (1). С. 215–231. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-1-215-231.

Mykhalchuk, N., & Koval, I. (2019). Psychological content of effective means of teaching a foreign language in order to form the intercultural competence of learners of different age groups. Проблеми сучасної психології: Зб. наук. праць Кам’янець-Подільського національного університету імені Івана Огієнка, Інституту психології імені Г. С. Костюка НАПН України. Кам’янець-Подільський : Аксіома. Вип. 46. С. 265–289.

Vovk, M., Emishyants, O., Zelenko, O., Drobot, O., & Onufriieva, L. (2020). Psychological Features оf Experiences оf Frustration Situa tions іn Youth Age. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. Vol. 8, Issue 01, January. P. 920–924. URL : http:// www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-0120-28117.

Wallentin, M., Rocca, R., & Stroustrup, S. (2019). Grammar, Gender and Demonstratives in Lateralized Imagery for Sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 48, 843–858. URL : https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10936-019-09634-1.

Published

2020-07-14

How to Cite

Хупавцева, Н. (2020). Psychological Principles of the Attributes of Facilitative Interaction. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (50), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-50.267-288