Psychological Mechanisms of Understanding Contemporary Texts of American Writers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-51.121-141

Keywords:

psychological mechanisms of understanding the texts, the style of the novel, the mechanism of Decentralization, the mechanism of Empathy, the mechanism of Reflection

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to define the style of the novel as complex and multi-layered process, and to propose psychological mechanisms of understanding contemporary texts of American writers.

The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization.

The results of the research. The degree of closeness of such a secondary text to the source will depend on many factors – the level of human understanding of the source text, the expectations and attitudes of the reader, the level of reader’s interests, reading goals and so on. The understanding of the text will include its division into relatively independent attitude in terms of actual content passages (text elements) with their subsequent regrouping in order to separate the main and the secondary context, the establishment of a hierarchy of meanings.

Conclusions. There were proposed psychological mechanisms of understanding contemporary texts of American writers. The first one is the mechanism of Decentralization: keeping in the minds of the reader of two contradictory ideas at the same time and while maintaining the ability to act, analyzing novels, creating their own stories, solving situations; overcoming personal egocentric manifestations; show tolerant, impartial attitude to the opinions and statements of communication partners; the transformation of the meaning of images, concepts, ideas, taking into account the author’s own emotional and cognitive positions, points of view, actions, lifestyle of others; change of views and positions of the reader by comparison of own point of view with representations and positions of other people and others. The next one is the mechanism of Empathy: taking into account the nature of independently selected novels (romantic, realistic, philosophical ones) for psychological analysis; recognition of mental states of people depicted in novels (a plot, a portrait, music, painting, psycho-artistic situations); determination of emotional states of characters of novels, communication partners, congruence of behavior in non-standard-stimulating situations or situations of cognitive dissonance. And the third mechanism is the mechanism of Reflection: the implementation of the relationships of the elements of a novel into a constructive system; substantiation of one’s own attitude to a certain situation, its participants, identification of personal and situational determinants of the behavior of the subjects of this situation (including if these subjects are the author and the heroes of the novel).

References

Honcharuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2018). Psykholohichnyi analiz rivniv pobudovy komunikatyvnykh dii [Psychological analysis of the levels of construction of communicative actions]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24 (1), 97–117. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117 [in Ukrainian].

Maksymenko, S., Тkach, B., Lytvynchuk, L., & Onufriieva, L. (2019). Neiropsykholinhvistychne doslidzhennia politychnykh hasel iz zovnishnoi reklamy [A neuropsycholinguistic research of political slogans from outdoor advertising]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 26 (1), 246–264 [in Ukrainian].

Chepeleva, N. V. (2006). Smyslova struktura tekstu yak chynnyk yoho rozuminnia [The semantic structure of the text as a factor in its understanding]. S. D. Maksymenko, M.-L. А. Chepa (Eds.). Aktualni problemy psykholohii – Current problems of Psychology, 9 (1), 113–123. Kyiv : Millennium [in Ukrainian].

Bach, R. (2003). Jonathan Livingston Seagull. Moskva : Iris Press.

Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaieva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments, (pp. 37–59). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.

Brédart, S. (1991). Word interruption in self-repairing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 123–137. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01067879.

Cilibrasi, L., Stojanovik, V., Riddell, P., & Saddy, D. (2019). Sensitivity to Inflectional Morphemes in the Absence of Meaning: Evidence from a Novel Task. Journal of Psycholinguist Research, 48, 747–767. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09629-y.

Crookes, G. (1989). Planning and interlanguage variation. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 367–383. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263100008391.

Mykhalchuk, N., & Bihunova, S. (2019). The verbalization of the concept of «fear» in English and Ukrainian phraseological units. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 19, 11. Warsaw (Poland). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2043.

Mykhalchuk, N., & Ivashkevych, E. (2019). Psycholinguistic Characteristics of Secondary Predication in Determining the Construction of a Peculiar Picture of the World of a Reader. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 25 (1), 215–231. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi : FOP Dombrovska Ya. M. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-1-215-231.

Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Kryshevych, Olga (2019). The peculiarities of the perception and understanding of Sonnets written by W. Shakespeare by the students of the Faculty of Foreign Languages. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psiholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 26 (1), 265–285. Pereiaslav-Khmelnytskyi : FOP Dombrovska Ya. M. DOI 10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-265-285.

Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2020). Psycholinguistic features of representation of emotions by the concept of «Fear». Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii: Zb. nauk. prats Kamianets-Podilskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Ohiienka, Instytutu psykho lohii imeni H. S. Kostiuka NAPN Ukrainy – Problems of Modern Psychology: Collection of research papers of Kamianets-Podilskyi National Ivan Ohiienko University, G. S. Kostiuk Institute of Psychology of the National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine, 48, 206–227.

Vovk, M., Emishyants, O., Zelenko, O., Drobot, O., & Onufriieva, L. (2020). Psychological Features of Experiences of Frustration Situations in Youth Age. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8 (01), 920–924. Retrieved from http://www.ijstr.org/paper-references.php?ref=IJSTR-0120-28117.

Downloads

Published

2021-03-18

How to Cite

Mykhalchuk, N., & Koval, I. (2021). Psychological Mechanisms of Understanding Contemporary Texts of American Writers. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (51), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-51.121-141