The Implicit Theory of Mind in the Dependence on Psychoactive Substances and under Standard Conditions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-52.225-252

Keywords:

persons dependent on psychoactive substances, Alcoholic Anonymous members, Theory of Mind, alexithymia, allocative perspective, personality factors

Abstract

The aim of the article is to compare the features of Theory of Mind between people dependent on psychoactive substances, at different stages of recovery and the group of conditional norm.

98 individuals participated in the research. In the study, the following groups were compared by different parameters: 1) persons dependent on psychoactive substances. This group includes patients of the rehabilitation center, i. e. people in the early stages of recovery who are dependent on alcohol and / or other psychoactive substances; 2) persons dependent on alcohol which are part of the previous group; 3) persons addicted to alcohol, at later stages of recovery. This group includes members of the Alcoholics Anonymous community; 4) persons belonging to the group of conditional norm.

Methods. There were used such instruments as Theory of Mind assessment scale (Th.o.m.a.s, Bosco, Gabbatore, Tirassa & Testa, 2016); Toronto Alexithymia Scale TAS26, adapted by Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute (Eresko, Isurina, Koidanovskaia, Karvasarskyi, Karpova, Korepanova & Shifrin, 2005); 5PFQ personality questionnaire, adapted by Hromov (Hromov, 2000). For further analysis, descriptive statistics as well as several non-parametric criteria (U-Mann-Whitney test; Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion) has been used.

The results. A number of statistically significant differences were found between the 4 groups. In particular, differences were found in ToM structure, in the severity of alexithymia, as well as in the strength of the manifestation of various factors and subfactors by the personal questionnaire 5PFQ. The complexity of the allocative perspective has been established in both groups of dependent persons, in patients of the rehabilitation center and within the group of Alcoholic Anonymous. It was found that these two groups are not statistically different in the Toronto alexithymic scale, although in both groups there are high median indicators, which are moderately higher the upper limit of normal scores, and there is a statistically significant difference between these groups and the conditional norm group.

Conclusions. ToM of persons dependent on psychoactive substances is characterized by a reduced understanding of their own emotions, if usage of psychoactive substances continues or has stopped recently, but it is resumed over the term of sobriety; while a high rate of alexithymia is remained. Also, persons dependent on psychoactive substances have a complication of the allocative perspective of ToM, even during the long-term sobriety.

References

Burmaka, N. P. (2003). Psykholohichni chynnyky formuvannia alkoholnoi adyktyvnoi povedinky u pidlitkiv ta yunatstva [Psychological factors of formation of alcohol addictive behavior in adolescents and youth]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv : KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].

Voznyi, D. V. (2013). Psykhoemotsiini osoblyvosti cholovikiv, khvorykh na alkoholnu zalezhnist [Psycho-emotional features of men with alcohol dependence]. Zahalna patolohiia ta patolohichna fiziolohiia – General pathology and pathological physiology, 8 (3), 97–101 [in Ukrainian].

Haponov, K. D. (2018). Alkoholna zalezhnist i sotsialnyi stres: biokhimichni, neirofiziolohichni i psykhosotsialni mekhanizmy vzaiemovplyvu (ohliad literatury) [Dependence on alcohol and social stress: biochemical, neurophysiological and psychosocial mechanisms of interplay (literature review)]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian visnyk of psychoneurology, 26 (1), 104–109 [in Ukrainian].

Husak, P. M., Martyniuk, T. A., & Sydoruk, I. I. (2013). Profilaktyka vzhyvannia psykhoaktyvnykh rechovyn pidlitkamy [Prevention of substance use by adolescents]. Lutsk : Vezha-Druk [in Ukrainian].

Darvishov, N. (2019). Osobystisni rysy i pryiniattia rishen u zalezhnykh vid psykhoaktyvnykh rechovyn osib [Personality traits and decision making of substance addicts]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers «Problems of Modern Psychology», 46, 88–113. DOI https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2019-46.88-113 [in Ukrainian].

Dubiaga, E. V., & Meshcheriakov, B. G. (2010). Implitsitnaia teoriia razuma: kratkii obzor [Theory of Mind: a brief review]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal Mezhdunarodnogo universiteta prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka – Psychological journal of Internetional university of nature, society and human, (Vol. 1). Retrieved from https://psyanima.su/journal/2010/1/2010n1a4/2010n1a4.pdf [in Russian].

Eresko, D. B., Isurina, G. S., Kaidanovskaia, E. V., Karvasarskii, B. D., Karpova, Ye. B., Korepanova, T. G., & Shifrin, V. B. (2005). Aleksitimiia i metody yeie opredeleniia pri pogranichnykh psikhosomaticheskikh rasstroistvakh [Alexithymia and methods of its definition at borderline psychosomatic disorders]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].

Martsenkovskyi, I. A., & Martsenkovska, I. I. (2019). Stabilizatory nastroiu: dyskusiini pytannia terapii alkoholnoi zalezhnosti [Mood stabilizers: controversial issues in the treatment of alcohol dependence]. Mizhnarodnyi nevrolohichnyi zhurnal – International neurological journal, 3, 70–76 [in Ukrainian].

Minko, O. I., Lisna, N. M., & Markozova, L. M. (2018). Indyvidualno-psykholohichni osoblyvosti osib z alkoholnoiu zalezhnistiu ta yikh spivzalezhnykh rodychiv, yaki vplyvaiut na formuvannia terapevtychnoho aliansu [Individual psychological characteristics of people with dependence on alcohol and their interdependent relatives, that influence the formation of a therapeutic alliance]. Ukrainskyi visnyk psykhonevrolohii – Ukrainian visnyk of psychoneurology, 26 (3), 39– 42 [in Ukrainian].

Pіnchuk, І. Ya., Kolodiezhnyi, O. V., Petrychenko, O. O., & Zdoryk, І. F. (2017). Analіz statystychnykh pokaznykіv rozladіv psykhіky ta povedіnky vnaslіdok uzhyvannia psykhoaktyvnykh rechovyn u 2015– 2016 rokakh [Analysis of statistical indicators of mental and behavioral disorders due to the use of psychoactive substances in 2015–2016]. Arkhіv psykhіatrіi – Аrchive of psychiatry, 23 (4), 252–260 [in Russian].

Khromov, A. B. (2000). Piatifaktornyi oprosnik lichnosti [Five-factor personality questionnaire]. Kurgan : Kurganskii gosudarstvennyi universitet [in Russian].

Chemerys, N. M. (2017). Medyko-sotsialni aspekty problemy vzhyvannia psykhoaktyvnykh rechovyn moloddiu [Medical-social aspects of the problem of psychoactive substance use by young people]. Ukraina. Zdorovia natsii – Ukraine. Health of the nation, 3, 285–291 [in Ukrainian].

Shcherbyna, L. F. (2004). Dynamika smyslovykh struktur osib, zalezhnykh vid psykhoaktyvnykh rechovyn, u protsesi psykholohichnoi reabilitatsii [Dynamics of semantic structures of persons addicted to psychoactive substances in the process of psychological rehabilitation]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Kyiv : KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka [in Ukrainian].

Bosco, F. M., Capozzi, F., Colle, L., Marostica, P., & Tirassa, M. (2014). Theory of mind deficit in subjects with alcohol use disorder: an analysis of mindreading processes. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 49 (3), 299–307.

Bosco, F. M., Gabbatore, I., Tirassa, M., & Testa, S. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Theory of Mind Assessment Scale in a sample of adolescents and adults. Frontiers in psychology, 7 (7), 1–12.

Goldman, A. (2012). Theory of Mind. Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Cognitive Science, (pp. 402–424). Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Gweon, H., & Saxe, R. (2013). Developmental cognitive neuroscience of theory of mind. Neural circuit development and function in the brain, 3, 367–377.

Jacobs, E., & Nader-Grosbois, N. (2020). Affective and Cognitive Theory of Mind in children with intellectual disabilities: how to train them to foster social adjustment and emotion regulation. J. Educ. Train. Stud, 8, 80–97.

Minnaard, A. M. (2020). Loss of control over substance use: Preclinical studies into the behavioural and neural mechanisms of addiction. Extended abstract of doctor’s thesis. Utrecht : Utrecht University. DOI 10.33540/163.

Onuoha, R. C., Quintana, D. S., Lyvers, M., & Guastella, A. J. (2016). A Meta-analysis of Theory of Mind in Alcohol Use Disorders. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 51 (4), 410–415. DOI 10.1093/alcalc/agv137.

Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and brain sciences, 1 (4), 515–526.

Schiffer, B., Pawliczek, C., Müller, B. W., Wiltfang, J., Brüne, M., Forsting, M., ... & Hodgins, S. (2017). Neural mechanisms underlying affective theory of mind in violent antisocial personality disorder and / or schizophrenia. Schizophrenia bulletin, 43 (6), 1229–1239.

Sprong, M., Schothorst P., Vos, E., Hox, J., & Engeland, H. (2007). Theory of mind in schizophrenia: meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 5–13.

Svanberg, J. (2018). The psychology of addiction. London; New York : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-01

How to Cite

Telcharov, O. (2021). The Implicit Theory of Mind in the Dependence on Psychoactive Substances and under Standard Conditions. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (52), 225–252. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-52.225-252