Compatibility Features between Athletes-Players with Different Efficiency of Team Activities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-53.60-77Keywords:
interpersonal relationships, compatibility, athletes-players, efficiency of sport team activitiesAbstract
The aim of the article is to compare the parameters of compatibility (psychophysiological and socio-psychological) among athletes-players with different efficiency of team activities.
Methods. Athletes representing various kinds of sports (football, basketball, etc.) took part in the research. Psychophysiological compatibility was studied using the cinematometric methodology of E.P. Ilyin, the method of diagnosing the temperament of Y. Streliau, and free conversation. The following methodologies were used for measurement of parameters of socio-psychological compatibility of athletes: «Sociometry» modificated by I.P. Volkov; methodology «Attitude to training and competitive activity» by Y.A. Kolomeitsev; methodology «Orientation of Personality» by V. Smekal and M. Kucher modificated by Y.A. Kolomeitsev; methodology «Motives of sports activity» by E.A. Kalinin. The efficiency of sports activities was calculated by the coefficient efficiency of the player presented in the competition statistics.
According to the design, the research is a comparative analysis of compatibility parameters of sports team members who differ in their efficiency indicators.
Results of the research. With the help of comparative analysis it was found the statistically reliable differences in various samples of athletes, namely:
- among members of one team who possess identical indicators of inertia – mobility of nerve processes, also their subjective assessments of the game partner and high success rates coincided;
- athletes with a high sociometric status in the team turned out to be significantly more productive than teammates with a lower status;
- the general motivation for sports activities is quite expected to be significantly higher in the group of highly productive athletes; at the same time, less productive players are dominated by a focus on themselves; and there are no differences in the severity of focus on interactions in different groups.
Conclusions. The empirical data proves that the content of separate components of compatibility (psychophysiological and sociopsychological) differs significantly among players with different success of sports activities. A hypothesis about the indirect nature of the connection between compatibility in the «athlete-athlete» system and the performance of team activities was raised.
References
Andreіeva, G. M., Bogomolova, N. N., & Petrovskaia, L. A. (1984). Sovremennaia sotsialnaia psikhologiia [Modern social psychology]. Moskva : Prosveshchenіie [in Russian].
Andreіeva, G. M. (Ed.). (1981). Mezhlichnostnyie vospriіatiia v gruppe [Interpersonal perceptions in a group]. Moskva : MGU [in Russian].
Babushkin, G. D., & Kulagina, E. V. (2019). Psikhologicheskaia sovmestimost v sportivnoi deiatelnosti i algoritm yeie opredeleniia [Psychological compatibility in sports activities and the algorithm for determining it]. Sportivnyi psikholog – Sport Psychologist, 3, 46–49 [in Russian].
Volkov, I. P. (1989). Sotsiometriia. Prakticheskiіe zaniatiia po psikhologii [Sociometry. Practical classes in psychology]. Moskva : Fizkultura i sport [in Russian].
Viatkin, B. A. (1978). Rol temperamenta v sportivnoi deiatelnosti [The role of temperament in sports activity]. Moskva : Fizkultura i sport [in Russian].
Gavrilovich, A. A. (2017). Sovmestimost kak pokazatel mezhlichnostnykh otnoshenii v sportivnoi komande i effektivnosti yeie deiatelnosti [Compatibility as interpersonal relations indicator in sports team and its efficiency of activity]. Nauchnyie trudy Respublikanskogo instituta vysshei shkoly. Istoricheskiie i psikhologo-pedagogicheskiie nauki – Scientific works of Republic Institute of Higher School. Historical and Psychological-Pedagogical Sciences, 17 (3), 64–70 [in Russian].
Groshev, A. M., & Butorin, V. V. (2018). Osobennosti vliianiia psikhologicheskoi sovmestimosti i splochennosti igrokov na rezultativnost komandnykh deistvii [Features of the influence of psychological compatibility and cohesion of players on the effectiveness of team actions]. Uchenyie zapiski universiteta imeni P.F. Lesgafta – Scientific Notes of P.F. Lesgaft University, 4 (158), 387–391 [in Russian].
Davydov, V. M., & Ladanov I. D. (1985). Psikhologicheskaia sovmestimost v trudovykh kollektivakh [Psychological compatibility in labor collectives]. Moskva : ANH [in Russian].
Zamaletdinov, I. S., & Bogdashevskii, R. B. (1984). O nekotorykh perspektivakh izucheniia i sovershenstvovaniia poznavatelno-tvorcheskoi deiatelnosti lichnosti i gruppy [About some prospects of studying and improving the cognitive and creative activity of an individual and a group]. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal – Psychological Journal, 5 (5), 13–23 [in Russian].
Ilin, E. P. (Ed.). (1981). Metodicheskiie ukazaniia k praktikumu po psikhofiziologii [Guidelines on the workshop on psychophysiology]. Leningrad : LGPI im. A.I. Gertsena [in Russian].
Kolomeitsev, Yu. A. (1984). Vzaimootnosheniia v sportivnoi komande [Relationships in a sports team]. Moskva : Fizkultura i sport [in Russian].
Kolomeitsev, Yu. A. (2004). Sotsialnaia psikhologiia sporta [Social psychology of sports]. Minsk : BGPU [in Russian].
Krichevskii, R. L., & Dubovskaia, E. M. (2001). Sotsialnaia psikhologiia maloi gruppy [Social psychology of a small group]. Moskva : Aspekt Press [in Russian].
Obozov, N. N. (1979). Mezhlichnostnyie otnosheniia [Interpersonal relationships]. Leningrad : Izd-vo LGU [in Russian].
Obozov, N. N. (2000). Sovmestimost i srabatyvaemost liudei [Compatibility and human responsiveness]. Sankt-Peterburg : LNPP «Oblik» [in Russian].
Petrovskii, A. V. (1982). Lichnost. Deiatelnost. Kollektiv [Personality. Activity. Group]. Moskva : Politizdat [in Russian].
Platonov, Yu. P. (1990). Psikhologiia kollektivnoi deiatelnosti [Psychology of collective activity]. Leningrad : LGU [in Russian].
Rodionov, A. V. (1979). Psikhologiia sporta vysshikh dostizhenii [Psychology of high-performance sports]. Moskva : Fizkultura i sport [in Russian].
Shalaginova, K. S., & Davydova, A. M. (2019). Osnovnyie podkhody k optimizatsii psikhologicheskogo klimata v sportivnoi komande [Basic approaches to optimizing the psychological climate in a sports team]. Mir pedagogiki i psikhologii – The World of Pedagogy and Psychology, 1 (30), 210–225 [in Russian].
Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York : Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Shaw, E. (1976). Group dynamics: the psychology of small group behavior. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Havrylovych Oleksandr
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
The Editorial Board has the full right to publish original scientific papers containing results of theoretical and experimental research works which are not currently subject to review for publication in other scientific editions. The Author shall transfer to the editorial board of the Collection the right to spread the electronic version of the paper, as well as the electronic version of the paper translated into English (for papers originally submitted in Ukrainian and Russian) by all kinds of electronic means (placement at the official website of the Collection, electronic databases, repositories etc).
The Author of an article reserves the right to use materials of the paper, without approval with the editorial board and the founders of this Collection: a) partially or fully, for educational purposes; b) for writing own dissertation papers; c) for preparation of abstracts, conference reports and presentations.
The Author of an article can place electronic copies of the paper (including the final electronic version downloaded from the official website of the Collection) at:
- personal web resources of all Authors (websites, webpages, blogs etc.);
- web resources of the institutions where the Authors are employed (including electronic institutional repositories);
- non-profit public access web resources (for example, arXiv.org).
But in all cases, it is obligatory to have a bibliographic reference to the paper, or a hyperlink to its electronic copy placed at the official website of this Collection.
