Psychological Structure of Communication: Scientific and Methodological Aspect

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-53.78-101

Keywords:

communication, communicative interaction, communicative behavior, communicative deed, communicative act, communicative activity, communicative process, communicative action

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to carry out a theoretical and methodological analysis of the psychological structure of communication. According to the purpose, the structural-logical analysis of communication is carried out, its basic components are identified and the psychological model of communication is reproduced.

Methods and techniques. Theoretical and methodological research was carried out on the basis of structural-logical, systematic and differential analysis, comparison, generalization, systematization, and scientific modeling.

Results and discussions. Based on scientific research, the essence of the concept of «communication» is clarified, its most important features and forms are determined. There are three main components of communication: communicative interaction, communicative behavior, and communicative activity.

By means of scientific analysis, a structural analysis of communicative interaction was carried out, which made it possible to single out its components and the smallest structural elements. The main components are communication and interpersonal relationships. The smallest structural elements are defined as a communicative event, as a holistically realized episode of communication, which involves interactive-informational exchange and communicative situation, as an interconnected set of external and internal factors realized in a particular communicative act.

In addition, the study of communication identified two other components: communicative behavior as a social activity aimed at interaction between individuals, and communicative activity as a social speech activity that has its own meaning and purpose. Communicative behavior is described as an individual set of norms and traditions of communication of individuals within social communities. Communicative activity is reflected as an activity that has an independent communicative purpose and contains all the features of activity such as goal and process setting.

During the theoretical analysis, their smallest structural characteristics were determined. Units of communicative behavior are defined as communicative action and communicative act (interaction), the smallest units of communicative activity – communicative process and communicative action.

Conclusions. On the basis of the conducted structural analysis the most important indicators of communication were described, whose formation became a necessary condition for the formation of communicative skills. A scientific model of communication has been developed and presented in a schematic presentation.

References

Honcharuk, N., & Onufriieva, L. (2018). Psykholohichnyi analiz rivniv pobudovy komunikatyvnykh dii [Psychological analysis of the levels of construction of communicative actions]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24 (1), 97–117. Retrieved from https://doi. 10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117 [in Ukrainian].

Horbatiuk, M.M. (2019). Mizhosobystisni stosunky yak chynnyk sotsialnoho stanovlennia osobystosti [Interpersonal relationships as a factor in the social formation of personality]. Osobystisni ta sytuatyvni determinanty zdorovia: Zb. materialiv konferentsii DNU imeni Vasylia Stusa – Personality-based and situational determinants of health: Proceedings of the conference of Vasyl Stus Donetsk National University, (pp. 60–64) [in Ukrainian].

Horokh, H.V., & Karpaliuk, V.S. (2009). Komunikatyvna linhvistyka [Communicative Linguistics]. Kamianets-Podilskyi : Zvoleiko D.H. [in Ukrainian].

Dzykovych, O.V. (2015). Komunikatyvno-prahmatychni aspekty movlennia [Communicative and pragmatic aspects of speech]. Kyiv : NTUU «KPI» [in Ukrainian].

Ivashkevych, E., & Prymachok, L. (2020). Psykholinhvistychni osoblyvosti rozvytku komunikatyvnoi kompetentnosti vchyteliv zahalnoosvitnikh shkil [Psycholinguistic features of the development of communicative competence of secondary school teachers]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24 (1), 95–121. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/ 10.31470/2309-1797-2020-27-1-95-121 [in Ukrainian].

Kaidalova, L.V., & Pliaka, L.H. (2011). Psykholohiia spilkuvannia [Psychology of communication]. Kharkiv : NFaU [in Ukrainian].

Lomov, B.F. (2006). Psikhicheskaia reguliatsiia deiatelnosti [Mental regulation of activity]. Moskva : IP RAN [in Russian].

Makarets, Yu. (2021). Psykholinhvistychna pryroda movnoi normy ta yii mistse sered faktoriv movlennievoi diialnosti [Psycholinguistic nature of language norm and its place among factors of speech activity]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 29 (2), 151–172. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2021-29-2-151-172 [in Ukrainian].

Maksymenko, S., Тkach, B., Lytvynchuk, L., & Onufriieva, L. (2019). Neiropsykholinhvistychne doslidzhennia politychnykh hasel iz zovnishnoi reklamy [A neuropsycholinguistic research of political slogans from outdoor advertising]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 26 (1), 246–264. https://doi.10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-246-264. Retrieved from https://psycholing-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/715 [in Ukrainian].

Moisieieva, F.A. (2009). Komunikatyvna povedinka v aspekti stosunkiv mizh osobamy [Communicative behavior in the aspect of interpersonal relationships]. Retrieved from http://www.rusnauka.com/5_NMIV_2009/Philosophia/40558.doc.htm (data zvernennia: 21.04.2020) [in Ukrainian].

Molchanova, N.V. (2005). Vliianiie emotsii na kommunikativnoie vzaimodeistviie [The influence of emotions on the communicative unit]. Kostroma [in Russian].

Nevzorova, M.S. (2017). Kommunikativnaia situatsiia ustnogo professionalnogo obshcheniia v ramkakh angloiazychnogo meditsinskogo diskursa [Communicative situation of oral professional communication within the framework of English-language medical discourse]. Nauchnyi dialog – Scientific dialogue, 3, 68–80 [in Russian].

Nikolaienko, S., & Nikolaienko, S. (2012). Problema spilkuvannia yak diialnosti [The problem of communication as an activity]. Svitohliad. Filosofiia. Relihiia – Outlook. Philosophy. Religion, 2, 85–93. Sumy : UABS NBU [in Ukrainian].

Onufriieva, L.А. (2020). Rozvytok profesionalizmu maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnykh profesii: sotsialno-psykholohichnyi vymir [The development of the professionalism of future specialists of socionomic professions: socio-psychological aspect]. Kyiv: Publisher Bykhun V.Yu. ISBN 978-617-7699-08-7 [in Ukrainian].

Poul, V., & Bodyk, O. (2019). Vplyv rehuliatyvnoi ta planuvalnoi funktsii movlennia na voliovyi rozvytok starshykh doshkilnykiv i molodshykh shkoliariv [Influence of regulatory and planning functions of speech on volitional development of senior preschoolers and junior schoolchildren]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 25 (1), 256–280. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-1-256-280 [in Ukrainian].

Rohoza, A.P. (2014). Movlennieva systemnist v terminakh komunikatyvnoi linhvistyky [Speech system in terms of communicative linguistics]. Suchasnyi vymir filolohichnykh nauk – Modern dimension of philological sciences: Proceedings of International scientific and practical conference. Retrieved from http://www.kamts1.kpi.ua/node/1059 [in Ukrainian].

Romanenko, T.L. (2008). Modeliuvannia komunikatyvnykh sytuatsii dlia formuvannia vmin inozemnoho dilovoho spilkuvannia [Modeling of communicative situations for the formation of foreign business communication skills]. Ukrainska nauka v merezhi Internet – Ukrainian science in the Internet: Proceedings of all-Ukrainian scientific and practical Internet conferences. Retrieved from http://intkonf.org/category/arhiv/ukrayinska-nauka-v-merezhi-internet/pedagogika/ [in Ukrainian].

Rudnytska, H.V. (2012). Fakt, podiia, novyna – vzaiemozviazok poniat u suchasnomu zhurnalistykoznavstvi [Fact, event, news – the relationship of concepts in modern journalism]. Informatsiine suspilstvo – Information society, 15, 13–17 [in Ukrainian].

Semeniuk, I.S. (2008). Typolohiia komunikatyvnykh sytuatsii [Typology of communicative situations]. Naukovi zapysky ZhDU imeni Ivana Franka – Scientific Notes of Ivan Franko State University, 10, 190– 194 [in Ukrainian].

Semeniuk, O.A., & Parashchuk, V.Yu. (2010). Osnovy teorii movnoi komunikatsii [Fundamentals of the theory of language communication]. Kyiv : Akademia [in Ukrainian].

Sternin, I.A. (2015). Modeli opisaniia kommunikativnogo povedeniia [Models for describing communicative behavior]. Voronezh : Garant [in Russian].

Stylianu, Kh.I. (2011). Komunikatyvni sytuatsii yak zasib formuvannia kultury movlennia starshoklasnykiv u protsesi vyvchennia humanitarnykh predmetiv [Communicative situations as a means of forming the speech culture of high school students in the study of humanities]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats KhIST Universytetu «Ukraina» – Collection of research papers of KhIST of the University «Ukraine», 4, 156–160 [in Ukrainian].

Sukhoterin, L.Ya., & Yudintsev, I.V. (2007). Informatsionnaia rabota v gosudarstvennom apparate [Information work in the state apparatus]. Moskva : Evropa [in Russian].

Teslenko, V.I., & Latyntsev, S.V. (2007). Kommunikativnaia kompetentnost: formirovaniie, razvitiie, otsenivaniie [Communicative competence: formation, development, assessment]. Krasnoiarsk : KGPU [in Russian].

Shabat-Savka, S.T. (2012). Dyskurs yak relevantnyi sposib vtilennia komunikatyvnykh intentsii [Discourse as a relevant way of embodying communicative intentions]. Ukrainska mova u XXI stolitti: tradytsii i novatorstvo – Ukrainian language in the XXI century: traditions and innovation: Proceedings from all-Ukrainian linguistic forum of young researches, (pp. 451–458). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Ivashkevych, E., & Onufriieva, L. (2021). The Development of Learner’s Autonomy by the Way of the Formation of Social Intelligence. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers «Problems of modern Psychology», 51, 09–32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-51.09-32.

Josse, E. (2019). Les techniques de communication dans la relation d’aide psychologique [Communication techniques in the counseling relationship]. Notions de base – Basics. Nancy : Pôle universitaire européen de Lorraine. Retrieved from http://www.resilience-psy.com/spip.php?article377 [in French].

Onufriieva, L.А. (2017). The Psychology of Professional Realization of a Future Specialist’s Personality: Theoretical and Methodological Aspect. Rzeszów : BonusLiber. ISBN 978-83-65441-83-6.

Onufriieva, L., Chaikovska, O., Kobets, O., Pavelkiv, R., & Melnychuk, T. (2020). Social Intelligence as a Factor of Volunteer Activities by Future Medical Workers. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9 (1), 84–95. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2536.

Trease, Sh.V. (2018). Types of communication behavior. Relationships & family. Retrieved from https://oureverydaylife.com/types-communication-behavior-8075513.html.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-28

How to Cite

Honcharuk, N. (2021). Psychological Structure of Communication: Scientific and Methodological Aspect. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (53), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-53.78-101