Writing as a Way to Form Students’ Creativity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-53.212-234

Keywords:

writing, students’ creativity, a creative product, a creative process, a creative person, levels of creativity, expressive creativity, productive creativity, inventive creativity, innovative creativity, generating creativity

Abstract

The aim of research is: to distinguish four approaches of defining the essence of creativity depending on which one of the four aspects of this problem is dominant in some a case: the environment in which creative activity is carried out; a creative product; a creative process; a creative person, his/her characteristics.

The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization.

The results of the research. After analyzing different approaches, we provide the following classification of definitions of creativity:

1) definitions that take into account novelty as the main criterion of creativity. In such a way, we point out that the characteristic «production of something new» is actually included these definitions. However, we’ll differently propose the approaches with the description of the novelty. Thus, we believe that it does not matter whether a society recognizes a certain idea as a new one, but it is important that it has to be new to the creator. On the contrary, we believe that novelty should be fixed in terms of culture, be recognized by contemporaries;

2) definitions in which creativity is opposed to conformity. It includes the definitions, which, contrasting the creativity to conformity, emphasize the importance of bringing originality, a new look at the problem. Such definitions include the understanding of creativity in such a way, when we believe that a creative person is free from both sides – we mean conformism and nonconformism;

3) definitions that focus our attention on the creative process. Thus, we emphasize the importance of creative thinking, and we consider creative thinking as a process of seeing or creating relationships between objects, phenomena, objects on both conscious and unconscious levels. In such a way, we distinguish four stages of the creative process: preparation, incubation, comprehension, review (or analysis). This understanding of creativity is based on any existing method of systematic training of subjects in the process of creative thinking;

4) the definitions that emphasize the importance of developing mental abilities of the person. We define creativity in a view of the development of mental abilities of the individual, which in such a way provides creative achievements in the process of the person’s activity. According to this, creative thinking includes divergent products in its structure, which, in turn, contribute to the generation of new, original, unusual and perhaps unique informational levels based on this standard, well-known paradigm of information. However, creative thinking is not reduced to divergent one, because it also implies a person’s sensitivity to problems, the ability to reorient.

Conclusions. We proposed the approach based on determining the levels of creativity which are developed by writing. We offered the following levels of creativity: a) expressive creativity – for example, spontaneous drawing by children; b) productive creativity – scientific and artistic products; c) inventive creativity, when ingenuity is manifested in materials, methods and techniques; d) innovative creativity – improvement through modification; e) generating creativity – the formulation of a completely new principle or assumption around which new ideas, concepts, theories and schools may arise.

References

Honcharuck, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana. (2018). Psykholohichnyi analiz rivniv pobudovy komunikatyvnykh dii [Psychological analysis of levels of communicative actions’ constructing]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24 (1), 97–117. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117 [in Ukrainian].

Ivashkevych, E., & Hudyma, A. (2019). Psychological ways of the development of intercultural competence of pupils in the field of «Foreign Language Education» (according to the experience of education in foreign countries). Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of scientific issues «Problems of modern Psychology», 49, 84–105. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.84-105.

Onufriieva, L.А. (2020). Rozvytok profesionalizmu maibutnikh fakhivtsiv sotsionomichnykh profesii: sotsialno-psykholohichnyi vymir [The development of the professionalism of future specialists of socionomic professions: socio-psychological aspect]. Kyiv : Publisher Bykhun V.Yu. ISBN 978-617-7699-08-7.

Amabile, T.M., Conti, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Creative environment at work. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1154–1184.

Boden, M.A. (1991). The creative mind: myths and mechanisms. New York : Basic Books; London : Abacus.

Collins, M.A., & Amabile, T.M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. Handbook of Creativity, (pp. 297–313). R. Sternberg (Ed.). Cambridge.

Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Kryshevych, Olha (2019). The peculiarities of the perception and understanding of Sonnets written by W. Shakespeare by the students of the Faculty of Foreign Languages. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 26 (1), 265–285. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-26-1-265-285.

Onufriieva, L.А. (2017). The Psychology of Professional Realization of a Future Specialist’s Personality: Theoretical and Methodological Aspect. Rzeszów : BonusLiber. ISBN 978-83-65441-83-6.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-28

How to Cite

Nabochuk, O. (2021). Writing as a Way to Form Students’ Creativity. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (53), 212–234. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-53.212-234