Psychological Components of Pedagogical Communication

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-57.70-89

Keywords:

pedagogical communication, psychological components, a discussion, a casual dialogic relationships, the system of accepted personal meanings, stylistic interruptions

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to determine psychological components of pedagogical communication; to show the most successful ways of organizing discussion at the lessons at institutions of higher education.

Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: the categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. The method of organizing empirical research was used as an experimental method.

The results of the research. It is proved, that for different people the same word, the action, the circumstance might have different meanings. Therefore, the child must not only master the language (words with different meanings), but also the system of accepted personal meanings, focused on relevant moral and spiritual values. It is showed, that, on the other hand, adults needed to understand the personal meanings of the child. Otherwise, interpersonal conflicts can arise in the process of communication, which not only lead to misunderstanding between partners, but also to disruption of feedback and interaction between people in general.

Conclusions. The teacher is proved to have formed his/her own individual language style, which would correspond to the composition of his/her personality, promote the person’s adequate expression and compensate the teacher’s negative traits. It is showed, that there was a great reason to believe that in order to achieve the greatest expressiveness of speech, to create a casual dialogic relationships in the discussion, the teacher could use elements of colloquial speech, heterogeneous vocabulary, stylistic interruptions, etc. In addition, mastering the techniques of creating the individual style of pedagogical speech forms, a teacher’s social maturity, it contributes to a more adequate orientation in various situations that are arisen in the classroom during discussions.

References

Aleksandrov, A.A., Memetova, K.S., & Stankevich, L.N. (2020). Referent’s Lexical Frequency Predicts Mismatch Negativity Responses to New Words Following Semantic Training. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49, 187–198. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09678-3.

Blagovechtchenski, E., Gnedykh, D., Kurmakaeva, D., Mkrtychian, N., Kostromina, S., & Shtyrov, Y. (2019). Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of Wernicke’s and Broca’s areas in studies of language learning and word acquisition. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 37–59. https://doi.org/10.3791/59159.

Charles, W. (2000). Contextual correlates of meaning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(4), 505–524. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400004057.

Honcharuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2018). Psykholohichnyi analiz rivniv pobudovy komunikatyvnykh dii [Psychological analysis of the levels of construction of communicative actions]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 97–117. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117 [in Ukrainian].

Ivashkevych, Er., & Komarnitska, L. (2020). Psychological aspects of comics as the paraliterary genres. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» – Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 49, 106–130. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.106-130.

Maksymenko, S., Тkach, B., Lytvynchuk, L., & Onufriieva, L. (2019). Neiropsykholinhvistychne doslidzhennia politychnykh hasel iz zovnishnoi reklamy [A neuropsycholinguistic research of political slogans from outdoor advertising]. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika –Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 26 (1), 246–264 [in Ukrainian].

Mykhalchuk, N., & Bihunova, S. (2019). The verbalization of the concept of “fear” in English and Ukrainian phraseological units. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, Warsaw (Poland), 11. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.2043.

Mykhalchuk, N., & Ivashkevych, Er. (2019). Psycholinguistic Characteristics of Secondary Predication in Determining the Construction of a Peculiar Picture of the World of a Reader. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 25(1), 215–231. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2019-25-1-215-231.

Mykhalchuk, Nataliia, & Khupavsheva, Natalia (2020). Facilitation of the Understanding of Novels by Senior Pupils as a Problem of Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psykholinhvistyka. Psiholingvistika – Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 28(1), 214–238. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31470/2309-1797-2020-28-1-214-238

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

How to Cite

Mykhalchuk, N., & Rudzevych І. (2022). Psychological Components of Pedagogical Communication. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (57), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-57.70-89