Facilitative Interaction as the Mechanism of Actualization of «Me-Real» and «Me-Ideal» of a Personality

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-58.227-246

Keywords:

facilitative interaction, “Me-real”, “Me-ideal”, psychological new formations of a personal and interpersonal nature, self-development

Abstract

The purpose of our research is to denote the principles of facilitative interaction in the process of interpersonal communication at lessons, to show the facilitative aspects of students’ autonomy, to describe facilitation as a phenomenon of interpersonal communication, to display the nature and genesis of facilitative interaction according to our own empirical researches, to prove that facilitative interaction is the mechanism of actualization of “Me-real” and “Meideal” of a personality.

Methods of the research. The following theoretical methods of the research were used to solve the tasks formulated in the article: a categorical method, structural and functional methods, the methods of the analysis, systematization, modeling, generalization. The pilot study as an empirical method was used in the study.

The results of the research. So, we’d like to show that facilitation is a change in the students’ performance during a contact with the teacher or other students. Even the passive presence of the teacher in the classroom greatly activates the students, directs their activity in the correct direction, stabilizes it outside of purposeful actions on the part of the teacher. However, the phenomenon of facilitation has considerable influence only if the teacher is authoritative, referential, recognized. Then, as a result of psychological and pedagogical interaction, various psychological new formations of a personal and interpersonal nature are arisen, which are usually called “changes” or “phenomena”.

Conclusions. We proved that one of the significant constructive phenomena of facilitative interaction is a psychological status of the individual, without the acquisition of which there cannot be a process of active, consistent progressive development and self-development of the individual. Psychological status characterizes not only the student’s real place in the system of interpersonal relationships, but also the position in a class, in family, peer groups. They also depend on the situation how he/she attributes to himself/herself. The need to build oneself as a personality, to get self-improvement, etc. does not arise spontaneously – it is formed in the process of facilitative interaction. It is psychological and pedagogical influences which allow the student to realize the difference between “Me-real” and “Me-ideal”, without which personal development cannot take place.

References

Allport, G.V. (1998). Lichnost v psikhologii: Teorii lichnosti [Personality in Psychology: Theories of Personality]. Moskva; St. Petersburg: KSP: YUVENTA [in Russian].

Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, d.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing Teacher Presence in a Computer Conferencing Context. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228749393_Assessing_Teaching_Presence_in_a_Computer_Conferencing_Context.

Brophy, J. (2006). History of Research on Classroom Management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of Classroom Management. Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues, 17-43. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Cannon, R., & Newble, d. (2000). A Guide to Improving Teaching Methods. A Handbook for Teachers in University and Colleges. London: Kogan Page.

Clifton, J. (2006). Facilitator talk. ELT journal, 60(2), 142-150.

Crosby, R.H.J. (2000). AMEE Guide No 20: The Good Teacher is more than a Lecturer-the Twelve Roles of the Teacher. Medical Teacher, 22(4), 334-347.

donald, H., Chemelsky, B., & Palmer M. (1982). Nursery rhymes and prose passages: Preschooler's liking and short-term retention of story events. Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 49-56.

Evertson, C.M., & Weinstein, C.S. (2006). Handbook of Classroom Management. Research, Practice, and Contemporary Issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lar- ence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Grasha, A.F. (1994). A Matter of Style: The teacher as Expert, Formal Authority, Personal Model, Facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 142-149.

Hmelo-Silver, C.E., & Barrows, H.S. (2006). Goals and Strategies of a Problem-Based Learning Facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of ProblemBased Learning, 1(1), 4.

Honcharuk, Nataliia, & Onufriieva, Liana (2018). Psykholohichnyi analiz rivniv pobudovy komunikatyvnykh dii [Psychological analysis of the levels of construction of communicative actions]. Psykholinhvistyka. Psikholingvistika. Psycholinguistics - Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics. Psycholinguistics, 24(1), 97-117. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.31470/2309-1797-2018-24-1-97-117 [in Ukrainian].

Ivashkevych, Er., & Komarnitska, L. (2020). Psychological aspects of comics as the paraliterary genres. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Prob- lemy suchasnoi psykholohii» - Collection of research papers “Problems of modern Psychology”, 49, 106-130. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.32626/2227-6246.2020-49.106-130.

Khupavtseva, Nataliia, & Lohvina, Oksana (2022). The Process of Facilita- tive Learning as the Basis of the Humanization of Education. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» - Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 56, 171-188. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-56.171-188

Khupavtseva, Nayaliia, & Kurytsia, denys (2022). The theory of attraction and the principles of facilitative interaction. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» - Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 55, 131-149. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-55.131-149

Khupavtseva, Nataliia, & Vashchenko, Iryna (2021). Psychological content of facilitative interaction. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» - Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 54, 209-231. Retrieved from https://doi. org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-54.209-231

Lakin, M. (1972). Interpersonal encounter. Theory and practice in sensitivity training. New-York: Penguin Books.

Mykhalchuk, N., & Onufriieva, L. (2020). Psychological Analysis of different Types of discourse. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» - Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 50, 188-210. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227- 6246.2020-50.188-210.

Onufriieva, L., & Ivashkevych, Ed. (2021). The development of learner's autonomy by the way of the formation of social intelligence. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats «Problemy suchasnoi psykholohii» - Collection of research papers “Problems of modern psychology”, 51, 9-32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2021-51.9-32

Rogers, C.R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80'S. Columbus: Charles E. Merril Publ. Co.

Zajonc, R., & Sales, S. (1996). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 160-168.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-06

How to Cite

Khupavtseva, N., & Slavina, N. (2022). Facilitative Interaction as the Mechanism of Actualization of «Me-Real» and «Me-Ideal» of a Personality. Collection of Research Papers "Problems of Modern Psychology", (58), 227–246. https://doi.org/10.32626/2227-6246.2022-58.227-246