CULTURE AS A WAY OF COGNITION OF LAW (SOCIAL AND CULTURAL PARADIGM LAW)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2019.191796Keywords:
culture, mentality, law, social and cultural phenomenon, civilization.Abstract
The purpose of the article is to highlight culture as a means of knowledge of law through a description of the interrelation of these social phenomena. The methodology of the research is based on the complex use of phenomenological, hermeneutical and systemic methods of scientific knowledge, allowing to comprehensively consider social phenomena. The scientific novelty of the research carried out is to prove the necessity of cognition of law through its connection with culture: only a social and cultural paradigm will allow an adequate understanding of the essence of law and strengthen its regulatory capacities, since law is the cultural heritage of the people, and therefore the gnoseology of law should be ambivalent, including both rational, and non-rational means. Conclusions. The current transitive state of domestic law is largely stipulated by the consideration of law as a phenomenon that is artificially created by public authorities (there is an identification of the law and law), to which the people are not directly related. The development of national law in the direction of enrollment into the Western legal culture necessitates the understanding of law as a phenomenon of culture, which is created with the participation of the people, reproduces its identity, mentality, values, culture. Culture is a factor in the pluralism of understanding of law by different peoples and determines the relativism of legal values. It is the social and cultural paradigm that allows us to know the true nature of law, to strengthen its regulatory capacities. The epistemology of law should be based not only on rational means but also on non-rational once – feelings, emotions. There is a need to supplement the conceptual and categorical apparatus of domestic jurisprudence with the term “legal civilization (culture)”.
References
Bigun V.S. Eugene Ehrlich: Life and Law Heritage (Current Scientific Sketch). Problems of the Philosophy of Law. 2005. Volume III. № 1-2. Р.105-126. [in Ukrainian].
Visson L. Russian Problems in English Speech. Words and Phrases in the Context of Two Cultures. Moscow: R.Valent, 2005. [in Russian].
Girke O. von. Historical School of Law and Germanicists. The Basis of Sociology of Law. St. Petersburg: LLC “University Publishing Consortium”, 2011. P. 36-72. [in Russian].
Zhebrovskaya K. Universalism and Relativism of Legal Values: General and Special. LEGEA ŞI VIAŢA. 2015. № 9/3. P. 18-20. [in Russian].
Litvinov O. M. Law as a Phenomenon of Culture: Author's Abstract. dis ... Dr. Lawrence. Sciences: 12.00.12. Kharkiv, 2016. [in Ukrainian].
Methodology and Innovation of General and Theoretical Jurisprudence. Ed. Yu.M. Oborotov. Odessa: Phoenix, 2019. [in Ukrainian].
Pavko A.I. Law and Culture: Methodological Problems of Mutual Influence. Legal Science. 2012. № 4. P. 12-18. [in Ukrainian].
Petrishin O.V. Law as a Social Phenomenon: Features of a Legal Approach. Problems of the Philosophy of Law. 2006-2007. Volume IV-V. P. 73-83. [in Ukrainian].
Poincare A. Recent Thoughts. Chapters from the book. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from http://vivovoco.astronet.ru/VV/PAPERS/ECCE/POINT.HTM. [in Russian].
Sorokin P.A. Social and Cultural Dynamics. Moscow: Astrel, 2006. [in Russian].
Fukuyama F. Strong State: Office and World Order in the 21st Century. Moscow: ACT: CHANNEL, 2006. [in Russian].
Huntington S. Clash of Civilizations. Moscow: OOO Publishing house AST, 2003. [in Russian].
Spengler O. The Sunset of the Western World; Essays on the Morphology of World History. Moscow: "Publishing house ALFA-KNIGA, 2010. [in Russian].
Erlich O. The Basis of Sociology of Law. Sankt Petersburg: LLC "University Publishing Consortium", 2011. [in Russian].
Brems E. Human Rights: Universality and Diversity. Hague/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001.
Hinkmann J. Philosophische Argumente fur und wider die Universalitat der Menschenrechte. Tectum Verlag, 1996.
Shynkaruk V. Myth as a phenomenon of culture. Herald of the National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts. 2018. № 4. С. 17-22.
Silbey, Susan S. Legal culture, and cultures of legality. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from web.mit.edu/ssilbey/www/pdf/legal_cu.pdf/ [in English].
Wessels L. Universality of human rights and cultural diversity: A Perspective. Retrieved May 20, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26634369_Universality_of_human_rights_and_cultural_diversity_A_Perspective. [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).