Development of artificial neural network for determining the components of errors when measuring angles using a goniometric software-hardware complex
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.141290Keywords:
artificial neural network, random error component, systematic error component, goniometerAbstract
We have developed an artificial neural network to determine the components of error in measuring the angles by automated goniometric systems whose change over time is a non-stationary random process. There are known techniques for processing measurement results and normalizing the systematic and random components of measurement errors, they have been applied for many years, they are well justified, maximally formalized, fundamentally different and are governed by respective regulations. However, it is still a rather difficult and labor-intensive procedure to determine exactly which component of an error is present in the measurement results. A given procedure is based on using the Fisher’s dispersion criterion. In order to automate this procedure and improve performance efficiency of performed operations, we have developed an artificial neural network (ANN) and examined its functioning. It was determined that the proposed ANN could be successfully employed instead of known analytical-computational procedure using the Fisher’s dispersion criterion. The application of ANN could significantly reduce labor intensity and improve the efficiency of determining the systematic and random components of measurement errors. This is predetermined by the capability of ANN to perform parallel processing of measurement data in real time. The practical implementation of ANN is based on using the neuro-simulator Neural Analyzer, analytical software Deductor Professional developed by BaseGroupLabs. We trained ANN and tested its functionality on the set of simulation results and actual multiple observations when measuring the plane angle of a 24-facet prism. The ability of ANN to quickly and correctly determine components of measurement errors at the stage of analysis of measurement information makes it possible to subsequently define methods for its further processing in accordance with regulatory requirements. That would improve the accuracy and reliability of measurement results as it could help avoid incorrect and inaccurate calculations when normalizing measurement errors.
References
- Cherepanska, I., Bezvesilna, E., Sazonov, A., Lavrischev, A. (2015). Automated technological complex to precise angles measurement based on goniometer. Technological Complexes, 1/2 (12), 38–45.
- Barinova, E. A., Ivashchenko, E. M., Pavlov, P. A. (2010). Rezul'taty issledovaniya pogreshnosti goniometricheskoy sistemy. Izvestiya SPbGETU «LETI», 5, 98–103.
- Shevchuk, V. P., Kaplya, V. I., Zheltonogov, A. P., Lyasin, D. N. (2005). Metrologiya intellektual'nyh izmeritel'nyh sistem. Volgograd, 210.
- DSTU 8.009:2008. Derzhavna systema zabezpechennia yednosti vymiriuvan. Normovani metrolohichni kharakterystyky zasobiv vymiriuvan (2008). Kyiv, 20.
- DSTU-N RMH 63:2013. Derzhavna systema zabezpechennia vymiriuvan. Zabezpechennia efektyvnosti vymiriuvan pry upravlinni tekhnolohichnymy protsesamy (2013). Kyiv, 18.
- Cherepanska, I., Bezvesilna, O., Sazonov, A., Nechai, S., Khylchenko, T. (2017). The procedure for determining the number of measurements in the normalization of random error of an informationmeasuring system with elements of artificial intelligence. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (9 (89)), 58–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.109957
- Farrance, I., Frenkel, R. (2012). Uncertainty of Measurement: A Review of the Rules for Calculating Uncertainty Components through Functional Relationships. Clin. Biochem. Rev., 33 (2), 49–75.
- Bennett, C. L., Odom, C., Ben-Asher, M. (2013). Knee Angle Estimation based on IMU data and Artificial Neural Networks. 2013 29th Southern Biomedical Engineering Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/sbec.2013.64
- Cherepanska, I., Bezvesilna, E., Sazonov, A. (2016). Artificial Neural Network as a Basic Element of the Automated Goniometric System. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 43–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48923-0_6
- Shrirao, N. A., Reddy, N. P., Kosuri, D. R. (2009). Neural network committees for finger joint angle estimation from surface EMG signals. BioMedical Engineering OnLine, 8 (1), 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-8-2
- Angel, A. D., Glavic, M., Wehenkel, L. Using Artificial Neural Networks to Estimate Rotor Angles and Speeds from Phasor Measurements. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.151.7413&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Zhang, J., Li, H., Lv, L., Zhang, Y. (2017). Computer-Aided Cobb Measurement Based on Automatic Detection of Vertebral Slopes Using Deep Neural Network. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2017, 1–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9083916
- Di Noia, A., Hasekamp, O. P., van Harten, G., Rietjens, J. H. H., Smit, J. M., Snik, F. Et. al. (2015). Use of neural networks in ground-based aerosol retrievals from multi-angle spectropolarimetric observations. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 8 (1), 281–299. doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-281-2015
- Otağ, I., Akkoyun, S., Taştemur, Y., Çimen, M. (2015). Boehler’s Angle Estimations in Calcaneus Bone by Using Artificial Neural Networks. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 36 (5), 57.doi: https://doi.org/10.17776/csj.56855
- Manivannan, N., Neil, M. A. A. (2011). Automatic angle measurement of a 2D object using optical correlator-neural networks hybrid system. Optical Pattern Recognition XXII. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/12.883653
- Li, Y., Fu, P., Li, Z., Li, X., Lin, Z. (2015). Biaxial Angle Sensor Calibration Method Based on Artificial Neural Network. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 46, 361–366. doi: http://doi.org/10.3303/CET1546061
- Kas'yanik, V. V., Dunec, A. P., Dunec, I. P., Shut', V. N. Primenenie neyrosetevogo podhoda dlya ocenki pogreshnosti odometrov mobil'nogo robota. Available at: http://robotics.bstu.by/mwiki/images/8/8d/Neuroinformatika_2012.pdf
- Golygin, N. H., Hinoeva, O. B., Yambaev, H. K. (2005). Vozmozhnosti povysheniya tochnosti geodezicheskih izmereniy na osnove iskusstvennyh neyrosetey. Izv. VUZov. Geodeziya i aerofotos'emka, 5, 17–27.
- Skvorcov, M. G., Zryumov, E. A., Pronin, S. P. (2011). Neyrosetevoy izmeritel'nyy preobrazovatel'. Izvestiya VolgGTU, 6 (5), 88–90.
- Zryumov, P. A. (2009). Issledovanie pogreshnosti opticheskogo metoda kontrolya chastoty vibracii ob'ekta, osnovannogo na primenenii geneticheskogo algoritma. Polzunovskiy al'manah, 2, 123–125.
- Herbert, L. T., Hansen, Z. N. L. (2016). Restructuring of workflows to minimise errors via stochastic model checking: An automated evolutionary approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 145, 351–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.002
- Vaysenzee, K., Pol'te, G. A., Lins, G. (2011). Avtomatizirovannoe opredelenie pogreshnosti geometricheskih izmereniy. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Priborostroenie, 54 (12), 47–49.
- Cherepanska, I. Yu. Kyrylovych, V. A., Bezvesilna, O. M., Sazonov, A. Yu. (2016). Teoriya i pryntsypy pobudovy avtomatyzovanoi systemy dlia liniynykh i kutovykh peremishchen obiektiv vyrobnytstva z vykorystanniam matematychnoho aparatu kvaternioniv i elementiv shtuchnoho intelektu. Zhytomyr: ZhDTU, 326.
- Cherepanska, I. Yu., Bezvesilna, O. M., Sazonov, A. Yu. (2017). Pat. No. 124155 UA. Sposib vymiriuvannia kutiv. No. 201709792; declareted: 09.10.2017; published: 26.03.2018, Bul. No. 6.
- Rojas, R. (1996). Neural Networks. A Systematic Introduction. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 502.
- D'yakonov, V. P., Kruglov, V. V. (2006). Matlab 6.5 SP1/7/7 SP1/7 SP2 + Simulink 5/6. Instrumenty iskusstvennogo intellekta i bioinformatiki. Moscow: SOLON-PRESS, 456.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Irina Cherepanska, Olena Bezvesilna, Artem Sazonov, Sergii Nechai, Oleksandr Pidtychenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.