Construction of methods for ensuring the required level of safety integrity in the automated systems of control over technological processes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.187716

Keywords:

safety integrity level, electronic programmable devices, information technologies

Abstract

The tasks of the study were stated, the theoretical and methodological concept of determining the indicators of reliability and safety of hardware and software (S) for the systems of control of technological processes (ASCTP) was proposed. We presented the aspects of modern approaches to solving the scientific and technical problem of ensuring the necessary safety integrity level (SIL) of technical facilities of the ASCTP for sites of increased danger. As a result of analysis and studying the regulatory framework, the separate methods for determining quantitative indicators of safety control were proposed. It is offered to determine the SIL of the studied hardware of the ASCTP component using the hybrid methods of expert analysis. It is proposed to carry out the hazards and operability analysis with the use of special protocols, which show the relations between possible causes of faults of source elements, their influence on functioning of control system and effect of a fault on the functions of the system. The existing methods were explored and the original methods for determining the standardized indicators of reliability in the analysis of SIL (safety integrity level) were proposed. Problems of ensuring the required SIL during development of the systems of control of technological processes were considered. The existing models and the methods for determining the safety integrity level of the systems of controlling dangerous sites fully meet modern requirements for certification procedures. Rational methods for assessing the probability of hardware faults include the FTA (fault tree analysis), which determine the probability of initiating dangerous events, and the ETA (event tree analysis) to account for the faults of protection systems and determining the scenarios of consequences of such faults

Author Biographies

Vitalii Ivanov, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University Tsentralnyi ave., 59-A, Severodonetsk, Ukraine, 93400

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Programming and Mathematics

Oleksandr Baturin, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University Tsentralnyi ave., 59-A, Severodonetsk, Ukraine, 93400

Senior Lecturer

Department of Programming and Mathematics

Vоlоdymyr Lyfar, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University Tsentralnyi ave., 59-A, Severodonetsk, Ukraine, 93400

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Programming and Mathematics

Serhii Mytrokhin, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University Tsentralnyi ave., 59-A, Severodonetsk, Ukraine, 93400

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Programming and Mathematics

Lilia Lyhina, Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University Tsentralnyi ave., 59-A, Severodonetsk, Ukraine, 93400

Senior Lecturer

Department of Programming and Mathematics

References

  1. Ouazraoui, N., Nait-Said, R. (2019). An alternative approach to safety integrity level determination: results from a case study. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36 (10), 1784–1803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-02-2019-0065
  2. Ouazraoui, N., Bourareche, M., Nait-Said, R. (2015). Fuzzy modelling of uncertain data in the layers of protection analysis. 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (IEOM). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ieom.2015.7093769
  3. Ouazraoui, N., Nait-Said, R., Bourareche, M., Sellami, I. (2013). Layers of protection analysis in the framework of possibility theory. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 262, 168–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.08.042
  4. Nait-Said, R., Zidani, F., Ouzraoui, N. (2009). Modified risk graph method using fuzzy rule-based approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164 (2-3), 651–658. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.086
  5. Zhao, X., Malasse, O., Buchheit, G. (2019). Verification of safety integrity level of high demand system based on Stochastic Petri Nets and Monte Carlo Simulation. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 184, 258–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2018.02.004
  6. Calixto, E. (2016). Gas and oil reliability engineering: modeling and analysis. Gulf Professional Publishing, 808.
  7. Smith, D. J. (2017). Reliability, maintainability and risk: practical methods for engineers. Butterworth-Heinemann, 478.
  8. Ahn, J., Noh, Y., Joung, T., Lim, Y., Kim, J., Seo, Y., Chang, D. (2019). Safety integrity level (SIL) determination for a maritime fuel cell system as electric propulsion in accordance with IEC 61511. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44 (5), 3185–3194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.065
  9. Musyafa’, A., Nuzula, Z. F., Asy’ari, M. K. (2019). Hazop evaluation and safety integrity level (SIL) analysis on steam system in ammonia plant Petrokimia Gresik Ltd. AIP Conference Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5095281
  10. Lee, B. C., Lee, H. S., Rhim, J. K. (2018). A Study on Safety Integrity Improvement of Oxidation Reactor on Propylene Oxide Process by Installed Safety Instrumented System (SIS). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 244–255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94391-6_23
  11. Simon, C., Mechri, W., Capizzi, G. (2019). Assessment of Safety Integrity Level by simulation of Dynamic Bayesian Networks considering test duration. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 57, 101–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2018.11.002
  12. Kim, S. K., Kim, Y. S. (2018). An Optimal Design Procedure based on the Safety Integrity Level for Safety-related Systems. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 12 (12), 6079–6097. doi: https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2018.12.025
  13. Śliwiński, M. (2018). Safety integrity level verification for safety-related functions with security aspects. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 118, 79–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.016
  14. Morillo, J. L., Zéphyr, L., Pérez, J. F., Lindsay Anderson, C., Cadena, Á. (2020). Risk-averse stochastic dual dynamic programming approach for the operation of a hydro-dominated power system in the presence of wind uncertainty. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 115, 105469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105469
  15. Funktsional'naya bezopasnost' sistem elektricheskih, elektronnyh, programmiruemyh elektronnyh, svyazannyh s bezopasnost'yu. Ch. 1. Obshchie trebovaniya: natsional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii GOST R MEK 61508-1-2007 (2008). Federal'noe agentstvo po tehnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii. Moscow: Standartinform, V, 44.
  16. Funktsional'naya bezopasnost' sistem elektricheskih, elektronnyh, programmiruemyh elektronnyh, svyazannyh s bezopasnost'yu. Ch. 2. Trebovaniya k sistemam: natsional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii GOST R MEK 61508-2-2007 (2008). Federal'noe agentstvo po tehnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii. Moscow: Standartinform, V, 58.
  17. Funktsional'naya bezopasnost' sistem elektricheskih, elektronnyh, programmiruemyh elektronnyh, svyazannyh s bezopasnost'yu. Ch. 3. Trebovaniya k programmnomu obespecheniyu: natsional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii GOST R MEK 61508-3-2012 (2014). Federal'noe agentstvo po tehnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii. Moscow: Standartinform, V, 97.
  18. Funktsional'naya bezopasnost' sistem elektricheskih, elektronnyh, programmiruemyh elektronnyh, svyazannyh s bezopasnost'yu CH. 6. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu GOST R MEK 61508-2-2007 i GOST R MEK 61508-3-2007: natsional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii GOST R MEK 61508-6-2007 (2008). Federal'noe agentstvo po tehnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii. Moscow: Standartinform, V, 62.
  19. Funktsional'naya bezopasnost' v nepreryvnyh proizvodstvah. Rukovodstvo po bezopasnosti protsessov. Natsional'nyy standart Rossiyskoy Federatsii GOST R MEK 61511-1-2011 (2013). Federal'noe agentstvo po tehnicheskomu regulirovaniyu i metrologii. Moscow: Standartinform, V, 66.
  20. Functional safety guidelines for safety related systems and other applications with SIL2, SIL3 level in accordance with IEC 61508 and IEC 61511. GM International Technology for safety (2013). Villasanta, 77.
  21. 12-1990 - IEEE Standard glossary of software engineering terminology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.1990.101064
  22. -2004 - IEEE Standard for Software Verification and Validation. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ieeestd.2005.96278
  23. ISO/IEC 12207:2008 Systems and software engineering – Software life cycle processes.
  24. Lyfar', V. A., Safonova, S. A., Ivanov, V. G. (2015). Development of optimization method of the repair work taking into account the risk indicators. Technology audit and production reserves, 2 (2 (22)), 11–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.40768
  25. Nair, S., Jetley, R., Nair, A., Hauck-Stattelmann, S. (2015). A static code analysis tool for control system software. 2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/saner.2015.7081856
  26. Fagan, M. E. (1976). Design and code inspections to reduce errors in program development. IBM Systems Journal, 15 (3), 182–211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.153.0182
  27. Henli, E. Dzh., Kumamoto, H. (1984). Nadezhnost' tehnicheskih sistem i otsenka riska. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 528.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-17

How to Cite

Ivanov, V., Baturin, O., Lyfar, V., Mytrokhin, S., & Lyhina, L. (2019). Construction of methods for ensuring the required level of safety integrity in the automated systems of control over technological processes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(2 (102), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.187716