Development of a toolkit for assessing and overcoming barriers to the implementation of energy saving projects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.214997

Keywords:

energy saving, energy-saving project, project implementation barrier, funding, energy efficiency, state support

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to develop a toolkit for assessing and overcoming barriers to the implementation of energy-saving projects. The barriers on the way to implementation of energy-saving projects at enterprises were grouped, and general approaches to evaluation of these barriers were determined. Modeling of economic barriers on the way to implementation of energy-saving projects at enterprises was fulfilled. The means of overcoming barriers to implementation of energy-saving projects were substantiated. The need for these studies is due to the need to assess and realize the potential of energy saving in the economies of many countries in Europe and the world. The existence of five main groups of barriers on the way to the implementation of energy-saving projects at enterprises was established. There is a reasonable need to take into consideration the sources of funding energy saving projects when assessing these barriers. It was found that according to the managers of enterprises, for all the studied industries of the Ukrainian economy, the most essential barrier to implementation of the projects of decreasing natural gas consumption is the insufficient level of their implementation. At the same time, the estimated effectiveness of state expenditures for subsidizing the researched enterprises is quite high. Therefore, it is appropriate to extend to cases of enterprises the Ukrainian practice of state subsidization of individuals receiving loans in order to implement projects to decrease the natural gas consumption. The importance of the obtained results is due to the possibility of their use both at the level of enterprises and in the practice of activity of state and municipal authorities in the development of energy-saving strategies and programs

Author Biographies

Valentyn Lesinskyi, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University Kotsiubynskoho str., 2, Chernivtsi, Ukraine, 58012

PhD, Assistant

Department of Radio Engineering and Information Security

Olexandr Yemelyanov, Lviv Polytechnic National University S. Bandery str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Oksana Zarytska, Lviv Polytechnic National University S. Bandery str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Anastasiya Symak, Lviv Polytechnic National University S. Bandery str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Tetiana Petrushka, Lviv Polytechnic National University S. Bandery str., 12, Lviv, Ukraine, 79013

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

References

  1. Ohliad analitychnykh robit mizhnarodnykh enerhetychnykh orhanizatsiy shchodo stanu ta stsenariyiv rozvytku svitovoi enerhetychnoi sfery z prohnozom investuvannia v enerhoefektyvnist (2018). Kyiv, 95. Available at: https://ua.energy/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/2.-rozvyt_svit_energet_sfery.pdf
  2. Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M. D., Wagner, N., Gorini, R. (2019). The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 24, 38–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006
  3. Global Energy Statistical Yearbook 2019. Available at: https://yearbook.enerdata.net/natural-gas/gas-consumption-data.html
  4. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Worrell, E., Pugliese, G. (2013). Empirical investigation of energy efficiency barriers in Italian manufacturing SMEs. Energy, 49, 444–458. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.012
  5. Zhang, Z., Jin, X., Yang, Q., Zhang, Y. (2013). An empirical study on the institutional factors of energy conservation and emissions reduction: Evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Policy, 57, 36–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.011
  6. Backman, F. (2017). Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Swedish Non-Energy-Intensive Micro- and Small-Sized Enterprises – A Case Study of a Local Energy Program. Energies, 10 (1), 100. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010100
  7. Kostka, G., Moslener, U., Andreas, J. (2013). Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 59–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.025
  8. Lesinskyi, V., Yemelyanov, O., Zarytska, O., Symak, A., Koleshchuk, O. (2018). Substantiation of projects that account for risk in the resource-saving technological changes at enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (1 (96)), 6–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.149942
  9. Yemelyanov, O., Symak, A., Petrushka, T., Lesyk, R., Lesyk, L. (2018). Assessment of the Technological Changes Impact on the Sustainability of State Security System of Ukraine. Sustainability, 10 (4), 1186. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041186
  10. Yemelyanov, O., Symak, A., Petrushka, T., Zahoretska, O., Kusiy, M., Lesyk, R., Lesyk, L. (2019). Changes in Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Aspirations for Energy Independence: Sectoral Analysis of Uses of Natural Gas in Ukrainian Economy. Energies, 12 (24), 4724. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12244724
  11. Nesbakken, R. (1999). Price sensitivity of residential energy consumption in Norway. Energy Economics, 21 (6), 493–515. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-9883(99)00022-5
  12. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Worrell, E. (2013). Innovation and adoption of energy efficient technologies: An exploratory analysis of Italian primary metal manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy, 61, 430–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.034
  13. Barriers to Industrial Energy Efficiency (2015). Report to Congress United States Department of Energy Washington, 28. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/06/f23/EXEC-2014-005846_6%20Report_signed_0.pdf
  14. Cagno, E., Worrell, E., Trianni, A., Pugliese, G. (2013). A novel approach for barriers to industrial energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, 290–308. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.007
  15. Kangas, H.-L., Lazarevic, D., Kivimaa, P. (2018). Technical skills, disinterest and non-functional regulation: Barriers to building energy efficiency in Finland viewed by energy service companies. Energy Policy, 114, 63–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.060
  16. Herrera, B., Amell, A., Chejne, F., Cacua, K., Manrique, R., Henao, W., Vallejo, G. (2017). Use of thermal energy and analysis of barriers to the implementation of thermal efficiency measures in cement production: Exploratory study in Colombia. Energy, 140, 1047–1058. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.041
  17. Bhandari, D., Singh, R. K., Garg, S. K. (2019). Prioritisation and evaluation of barriers intensity for implementation of cleaner technologies: Framework for sustainable production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 156–167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.038
  18. Palm, J., Backman, F. (2020). Energy efficiency in SMEs: overcoming the communication barrier. Energy Efficiency, 13 (5), 809–821. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09839-7
  19. Overcoming Barriers to Investing in Energy Efficiency (2017). Energy Series No. 56. United nations economic commission for Europe. United nations New York and Geneva. Available at: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/energy/se/pdfs/geee/pub/Overcoming_barriers-energy_efficiency-FINAL.pdf
  20. Hui, J., Cai, W., Wang, C., Ye, M. (2017). Analyzing the penetration barriers of clean generation technologies in China’s power sector using a multi-region optimization model. Applied Energy, 185, 1809–1820. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.034
  21. Yemelyanov, O., Symak, A., Petrushka, T., Lesyk, R., Lesyk, L. (2018). Evaluation of the Adaptability of the Ukrainian Economy to Changes in Prices for Energy Carriers and to Energy Market Risks. Energies, 11 (12), 3529. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123529
  22. Yemelyanov, O., Petrushka, T., Symak, A., Trevoho, O., Turylo, A., Kurylo, O. et. al. (2020). Microcredits for Sustainable Development of Small Ukrainian Enterprises: Efficiency, Accessibility, and Government Contribution. Sustainability, 12 (15), 6184. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156184
  23. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., Franzò, S., Frattini, F., Manfredi Latilla, V. (2016). Overcoming internal barriers to industrial energy efficiency through energy audit: a case study of a large manufacturing company in the home appliances industry. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19 (4), 1031–1046. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1298-5
  24. Chai, K.-H., Yeo, C. (2012). Overcoming energy efficiency barriers through systems approach – A conceptual framework. Energy Policy, 46, 460–472. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.012
  25. State Agency on Energy Efficiency and Energy Saving of Ukraine. Available at: http://saee.gov.ua/en

Downloads

Published

2020-10-31

How to Cite

Lesinskyi, V., Yemelyanov, O., Zarytska, O., Symak, A., & Petrushka, T. (2020). Development of a toolkit for assessing and overcoming barriers to the implementation of energy saving projects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (107), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.214997

Issue

Section

Control processes