Development of а matrix of food industry capacity for making management decisions in the formation of sustainable development of agroecosystems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.227805

Keywords:

digitalization, technological transformation, customization, high-tech agriculture, food security

Abstract

A theoretical and methodological study was carried out to determine the need and features of developing a matrix of food industry capacity for making management decisions in the formation of sustainable development of agroecosystems, which will increase the operational efficiency of companies and food security of the country. The paper uses the following research methods: historical – in the process of studying modern views on understanding the importance of the agricultural sector for the economy; system analysis – when building a model of innovative business improvement. Methods of comparison and analysis of trends – the study of trends in the agricultural sector of Ukraine with the identification of important areas for improving their activities. Methods of financial analysis – for the analytical assessment of financial and economic activities of the investigated enterprises; forecasting methods – to substantiate the expected results of implementing the author's proposals in management practice. It is proposed to take into account the significant difference in the technology of their processing and production (number of advanced technologies used per 100 thousand people). The paper reveals the dependence of production technologies in agriculture on natural and weather conditions (share of technological innovation costs, %). Criteria for innovation skills in the development of agricultural engineering were proposed. The criteria were determined, which were divided into development groups. The tools for constructing a matrix of food industry capacity were substantiated. Note that for each indicator, the optimal value was determined taking into account the sensitivity factor and the rating of enterprises, which determined their place in the matrix. In the course of the study and the matrix of innovative development, the proposed technology was tested at leading domestic enterprises

Author Biographies

Kateryna Andriushchenko, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship

Oleksandr Datsii, Interregional Academy of Personnel Managemen

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance

Oksana Lavruk, Kamianets-Podіlskyi Ivan Ohiienko National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management

Ruslan Dmytrenko, Vinnytsia National Agrarian University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Administrative Management and Alternative Energy Sources

Igor Kutashev, Interregional Academy of Personnel Management

Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor

Department of Philosophy and Political Science

Igor Vіnіchenko, Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economic

Dmytro Mishchenko, University of Customs and Finance

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Finance

Yulia Kakhovych, University of Customs and Finance

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management of Foreign Economic Activity

Konstantin Pivovarov, Interregional Academy of Personnel Management

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor

Department of Public Administration

Ganna Ortina, Dmytro Motornyi Tavria State Agrotechnological University

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Associate Professor

Department of Public Administration, Administration and Law

References

  1. Andreoni, A. (2016). Varieties of Industrial Policy: Models, Packages, and Transformation Cycles. Efficiency, Finance, and Varieties of Industrial Policy, 245–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.7312/noma18050-009
  2. Babu, S. C., Shishodia, M. (2017). Agribusiness competitiveness: Applying analytics, typology, and measurements to Africa. International Food Policy Research Institute. Available at: http://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/131232/filename/131443.pdf
  3. Nipitvittaya, M. Precision Agriculture and Agritech concept. Sensor network in Agriculture technology network on framer using smart phone to connect the sensor system against vegetable field background. Available at: https://www.shutterstock.com/ru/image-photo/precision-agriculture-agritech-concept-sensor-network-524072125
  4. Lavruk, A., Lavruk, V. (2019). Problems of revival and development of animal husbandry in Ukraine. Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski, 10 (1), 201–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.31648/pw.4514
  5. Sabluk, P. T., Kropivko, M. F. (2010). Clustering as a mechanism for increasing the competitiveness and social orientation of the agrarian economy. APK Economy, 1, 3–13.
  6. Andriushchenko, K., Kovtun, V., Shergina, L., Rozhko, O., Yefimenko, L. (2020). Agro-based Clusters: A Tool for Effective Management of Regional Development in the ERA of Globalisation. TEM Journal, 9 (1), 198–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM91-28
  7. Yu, M., Calzadilla, J., Lopez, J. L., Villa, A. (2013). Engineering agro-food development: The cluster model in China. Agricultural Sciences, 04 (09), 33–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.49b006
  8. Google's Sergey Brin explains why he paid $330,000 for lab burger (2013). Available at: https://www.nbcnews.com/technolog/googles-sergey-brin-explains-why-he-paid-330-000-lab-6C10853442
  9. Tillak, P. (Ed.) (2000). Land ownership, land markets and their influence on the efficiency of agricultural production in Central and Eastern Europe. Kiel: Wiss.-Verl. Vauk, 123–124.
  10. Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., Newig, J. (2015). What Is Sustainable Agriculture? A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 7 (6), 7833–7865. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067833
  11. Environmental indicators for agriculture: Methods and Results (2001). Vol. 3. French: OECD, 400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264188556-en
  12. ASAE Standards D497.4. Agricultural machinery management data. American Society of Agricultural Engineers.
  13. Liezina, A. V., Andriushchenko, K. A., Rozhko, O. D., Datsii, O. I., Mishchenko, L. О., Cherniaieva, O. O. (2020). Resource planning for risk diversification in the formation of a digital twin enterprise. Accounting, 1337–1344. doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2020.8.016
  14. Feher, I., Beke, J. (2013). Rationale of sustainable agriculture. Iustum Aequum Salutare, 9, 73–87.
  15. Lebacq, T., Baret, P. V., Stilmant, D. (2012). Sustainability indicators for livestock farming. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33 (2), 311–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0121-x
  16. Binder, C. R., Feola, G., Steinberger, J. K. (2010). Considering the normative, systemic and procedural dimensions in indicator-based sustainability assessments in agriculture. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30 (2), 71–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2009.06.002
  17. Schader, C., Grenz, J., Meier, M. S., Stolze, M. (2014). Scope and precision of sustainability assessment approaches to food systems. Ecology and Society, 19 (3). doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06866-190342
  18. Marta-Costa, A. A., Silva, E. (2012). Approaches for Sustainable Farming Systems Assessment. Methods and Procedures for Building Sustainable Farming Systems, 21–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5003-6_3
  19. De Olde, E. M., Oudshoorn, F. W., Sørensen, C. A. G., Bokkers, E. A. M., de Boer, I. J. M. (2016). Assessing sustainability at farm-level: Lessons learned from a comparison of tools in practice. Ecological Indicators, 66, 391–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.047
  20. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., Traverso, M. (2010). Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 2 (10), 3309–3322. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su2103309
  21. Gasparatos, A. (2010). Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 91 (8), 1613–1622. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.014
  22. Marchand, F., Debruyne, L., Triste, L., Gerrard, C., Padel, S., Lauwers, L. (2014). Key characteristics for tool choice in indicator-based sustainability assessment at farm level. Ecology and Society, 19 (3). doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06876-190346
  23. DeSarbo, W. S., Anthony Di Benedetto, C., Michael Song, Sinha, I. (2004). Revisiting the Miles and Snow strategic framework: uncovering interrelationships between strategic types, capabilities, environmental uncertainty, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (1), 47–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.431
  24. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Ferrándiz, E. (2013). Trends in the acquisition of external knowledge for innovation in the food industry. Open Innovation in the Food and Beverage Industry, 3–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097248.1.3
  25. Arcese, G., Flammini, S., Lucchetti, M., Martucci, O. (2015). Evidence and Experience of Open Sustainability Innovation Practices in the Food Sector. Sustainability, 7 (7), 8067–8090. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078067
  26. Jacobs, B. W., Singhal, V. R., Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28 (5), 430–441. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.001
  27. Foltýn, I., Štiková, O., Mrhálková, I., Zedníčková, I. (2016). Model AGRO-2014 for simulation of strategic decision making in the area of agrarian complex. Agrarian Perspectives XXV. Global and European Challenges for Food Production, Agribusiness and the Rural Economy, Proceedings of the 25th International Scientific Conference. Prague, 105–112.
  28. Andriushchenko, K., Tepliuk, M., Boniar, S., Ushenko, N., Liezina, A. (2019). Influence of cost drivers on value-oriented management of investment activity of companies. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 16 (3), 353–364. doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(3).2019.31
  29. Andriushchenko, K., Datsii, O., Aleinikova, O., Mohamed Abdulla, A., Mohammed Ali, A. (2019). Improvement of the water resources management system at the territorial level. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17 (3), 421–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.34
  30. Monitoring the performance of agriculture and food systems. GSDR 2015 Brief. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/6469103-Monitoring%20the%20performance%20of%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems.pdf
  31. Romanenko, Y. O. (2016). Place and role of communication in public policy. Actual Problems of Economics, 2 (176), 25–31.
  32. Andriushchenko, K., Ishchenko, M., Sahaidak, M., Tepliuk, M., Domina, O. (2019). Prerequisites for the creation of financial and credit infrastructure of support for agricultural enterprises in Ukraine. Banks and Bank Systems, 14 (2), 63–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(2).2019.06
  33. Skokan, K. (2007). The Role of Clusters in the Regional Policy of the Czech Republic. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Available at: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/12353/1/MPRA_paper
  34. Kovtun, V., Andriushchenko, K., Horbova, N., Lavruk, O., Muzychka, Y. (2020). Features of the Management Process of Ambidextrous Companies. TEM Journal, 9 (1), 221–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM91-31

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Andriushchenko, K., Datsii, O., Lavruk, O., Dmytrenko, R., Kutashev, I., Vіnіchenko I., Mishchenko, D., Kakhovych, Y., Pivovarov, K., & Ortina, G. (2021). Development of а matrix of food industry capacity for making management decisions in the formation of sustainable development of agroecosystems . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13 (110), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.227805

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 13 (110) (2021): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Екатерина Анатольевна Андрющенко, Александр Иванович Даций, Оксана Степановна Лаврук, Руслан Николаевич Дмитренко, Игорь Викторович Куташев, Игорь Иванович Виниченко, Дмитрий Анатольевич Мищенко, Юлия Александровна Кахович, Константин Владимирович Пивоваров, Анна Владимировна Ортина

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.