Assessment of speech intelligibility in university lecture rooms of different sizes using objective and subjective methods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.228405

Keywords:

binaural room impulse response, speech intelligibility, early reflections of sound

Abstract

The scores of speech intelligibility, obtained using objective and subjective methods for three university lecture rooms of the small, medium, and large sizes with different degrees of filling, were presented. The problem of achieving high speech intelligibility is relevant for both students and university administration, and for architects designing or reconstructing lecture rooms. Speech intelligibility was assessed using binaural room impulse responses which applied an artificial head and non-professional quality audio equipment for measuring. The Speech Transmission Index was an objective measure of speech intelligibility, while the subjective evaluation of speech intelligibility was carried out using the articulation method.

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of parameters of impulse response as a measure of speech intelligibility showed that Early Decay Time exceeded the score of the T30 reverberation time but was ineffective in a small lecture room. The C50 clarity index for all the considered lecture rooms was the most informative. Several patterns determined by the influence of early sound reflections on speech intelligibility were detected. Specifically, it was shown that an increase in the ratio of the energy of early reflections to the energy of direct sound leads to a decrease in speech intelligibility. The exceptions are small, up to 30‒40 cm, distances from the back wall of the room, where speech intelligibility is usually slightly higher than in the middle of the room. At a distance of 0.7–1.7 m from the side walls of the room, speech intelligibility is usually worse for the ear, which is closer to the wall. The usefulness of the obtained results lies in refining the quantitative characteristics of the influence of early reflections of sound on speech intelligibility at different points of lecture rooms.

Author Biographies

Arkadiy Prodeus, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Acoustic and Multimedia Electronic Systems

Maryna Didkovska, National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Mathematical Methods of System Analysis

References

  1. Eggenschwiler, K. (2005). Lecture Halls - Room Acoustics and Sound Reinforcement. Conference: 4th European congress on acoustics (Forum Acusticum 2005). Budapest. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238114069_Lecture_Halls_-_Room_Acoustics_and_Sound_Reinforcement
  2. Bradley, J. S., Reich, R. D., Norcross, S. G. (1999). On the combined effects of signal-to-noise ratio and room acoustics on speech intelligibility. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106 (4), 1820–1828. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427932
  3. Bradley, J. S., Sato, H., Picard, M. (2003). On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113 (6), 3233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1570439
  4. Hu, Y., Kokkinakis, K. (2014). Effects of early and late reflections on intelligibility of reverberated speech by cochlear implant listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 135 (1), EL22–EL28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4834455
  5. Yang, W., Bradley, J. S. (2009). Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125 (2), 922–933. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3058900
  6. Bradley, J. S. (2011). Review of objective room acoustics measures and future needs. Applied Acoustics, 72 (10), 713–720. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2011.04.004
  7. Arweiler, I., Buchholz, J., Dau, T. (2009). Speech intelligibility enhancement by early reflections. ISAAR 2009: Binaural Processing and Spatial Hearing. 2nd International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research. Elsinore, Denmark. Available at: https://proceedings.isaar.eu/index.php/isaarproc/article/view/2009-29
  8. Warzybok, A., Rennies, J., Doclo, S., Kollmeier, B. (2011). Influence of early reflections on speech intelligibility under different noise conditions. Forum Acusticum. Aalborg, Denmark. Available at: https://uol.de/f/6/dept/mediphysik/ag/sigproc/download/papers/SP2011_5.pdf
  9. Nocke, C. (2016). New standards in Architectural Acoustics - a German view. Proceedings of ACOUSTICS 2016. Brisbane, Australia. Available at: https://www.acoustics.asn.au/conference_proceedings/AASNZ2016/papers/p114.pdf
  10. DIN 18041:2004-05. Acoustic quality in small to medium-sized rooms (2004). Beuth Verlag GmbH, 39. Available at: https://www.beuth.de/de/norm/din-18041/69640391
  11. ANSI/ASA S12.60-2010/Part 1 (R2015). Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for schools, Part 1: permanent schools (2015). American National Standards Institute. Available at: https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/asa/ansiasas12602010partr2015
  12. BS EN 60268-16:2011. Sound System Equipment - Part 16: Objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index (2011). British Standards Institution. Available at: https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/BS-EN-60268-16-2011-217511_SAIG_BSI_BSI_512663/
  13. IEC 60268-16:4.0. Sound system equipment - Part 16: objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission index (2011). International Electrotechnical Committee. Available at: https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-us/Standards/IEC-60268-16-4-0-569917_SAIG_IEC_IEC_1301856/
  14. Acoustic design of schools: performance standards. Building bulletin 93 (2015). UK Department for Education, UK Education Funding Agency. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/400784/BB93_February_2015.pdf
  15. Canning, D., James, A. (2012). The Essex Study. Optimised classroom acoustics for all. The Association of Noise Consultants. Available at: https://www.ndcs.org.uk/media/1808/the_essex_study_optimised_classroom_acoustics_for_all1.pdf
  16. ISO 3382-1:2009(en). Acoustics – Measurement of room acoustic parameters – Part 1: Performance spaces. Available at: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:3382:-1:ed-1:v1:en
  17. Sari, L. F., Utami, S. S., Sarwono, J. (2018). Objective and subjective acoustics measurement of audience seating areas in a medium size auditorium. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1075, 012015. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1075/1/012015
  18. Choi, Y.-J. (2020). The intelligibility of speech in university classrooms during lectures. Applied Acoustics, 162, 107211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2020.107211
  19. Eldakdoky, S. (2017). Optimizing acoustic conditions for two lecture rooms in Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 8 (4), 481–490. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2016.08.013
  20. Leccese, F., Rocca, M., Salvadori, G. (2018). Fast estimation of Speech Transmission Index using the Reverberation Time: Comparison between predictive equations for educational rooms of different sizes. Applied Acoustics, 140, 143–149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2018.05.019
  21. Nestoras, C., Dance, S. (2013). The Interrelationship between Room Acoustics Parameters as Measured in University Classrooms Using Four Source Configurations. Building Acoustics, 20 (1), 43–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1260/1351-010x.20.1.43
  22. Jacob, K. (1989). Correlation of Speech Intelligibility Tests in Reverberant Rooms with Three Predictive Algorithms. JAES, 37 (12), 1020–1030. Available at: https://www.aes.org/e-lib/browse.cfm?elib=6056
  23. Jeub, M., Schafer, M., Vary, P. (2009). A binaural room impulse response database for the evaluation of dereverberation algorithms. 2009 16th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/icdsp.2009.5201259
  24. Aachen Impulse Response Database. Available at: https://www.iks.rwth-aachen.de/en/research/tools-downloads/databases/aachen-impulse-response-database/
  25. Tikhonov, A. N. (1965). On incorrect problems of linear algebra and a stable method for their solution. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, 163 (3), 591–594. Available at: http://www.mathnet.ru/links/c317fafa3fe690e2d1c52f383762a0e2/dan31374.pdf
  26. Kuttruff, H. (2009). Room Acoustics. CRC Press, 392. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482266450
  27. Steeneken, H. (2014). Forty years of speech intelligibility assessment (and some history). Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 36 (3). Available at: http://www.steeneken.nl/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/IOA-Forty-years-keynote.pdf
  28. Prodeus, A., Bukhta, K., Morozko, P., Serhiienko, O., Kotvytskyi, I., Shherbenko, I. (2018). Automated System for Subjective Evaluation of the Ukrainian Speech Intelligibility. 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/elnano.2018.8477568
  29. Naida, S., Didkovskyi, V., Pavlenko, O., Naida, N. (2019). Spectral Analysis of Sounds by Acoustic Hearing Analyzer. 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/elnano.2019.8783915
  30. Naida, S., Didkovskyi, V., Pavlenko, O., Naida, N. (2019). Objective Audiometry Based on the Formula of the Middle Ear Parameter: A New Technique for Researches and Differential Diagnosis of Hearing. 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/elnano.2019.8783502
  31. Waterhouse, R. V. (1955). Interference Patterns in Reverberant Sound Fields. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27 (2), 247–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907509
  32. Jacobsen, F., Tiana-Roig, E. (2010). Measurement of the Sound Power Incident on the Walls of a Reverberation Room with Near Field Acoustic Holography. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 96 (1), 76–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.3813/aaa.918258
  33. Duran, S., Ausiello, L., Battaner-Moro, J. (2019). Acoustic Design Criteria for Higher-Education Learning Environments. Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 41 (3), 1–12. Available at: https://pure.solent.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/10957857/Duran_Ausiello_Battaner_Moro_SOLENT_REPRODUCED_SOUND_2019_.pdf
  34. Jedidi, M., Boulila, A. (2016). Acoustic study of an auditorium by the determination of reverberation time and speech transmission index. Int. J. Architect. Eng. Urban Plan, 26 (1), 25–32. Available at: http://ijaup.iust.ac.ir/article-1-312-en.pdf
  35. Prodeus, A., Didkovska, M., Motorniuk, D., Dvornyk, O. (2020). The Effects of Noise, Early and Late Reflections on Speech Intelligibility. 2020 IEEE 40th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/elnano50318.2020.9088854
  36. Prodeus, A., Didkovska, M. (2020). Objective assessment of speech intelligibility in small and medium-sized classrooms. Conference: 2020 IEEE International Conference "Problems of Infocommunications. Science and Technology" (PIC S&T′2020). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347490796_Objective_Assessment_of_Speech_Intelligibility_in_Small_and_Medium-Sized_Classrooms
  37. Prodeus, A., Didkovska, M., Kukharicheva, K., Motorniuk, D. (2020). Modeling the Influence of Early Sound Reflections on Speech Intelligibility. 2020 IEEE 6th International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/msnmc50359.2020.9255657
  38. Lochner, J. P. A., Burger, J. F. (1964). The influence of reflections on auditorium acoustics. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1 (4), 426–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-460x(64)90057-4

Downloads

Published

2021-06-25

How to Cite

Prodeus, A., & Didkovska, M. (2021). Assessment of speech intelligibility in university lecture rooms of different sizes using objective and subjective methods . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(5 (111), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.228405

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 5 (111) (2021): Applied physics

Section

Applied physics

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Arkadiy Prodeus, Maryna Didkovska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.