Modeling of a system of quality assessment indicators of measuring instruments

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.228853

Keywords:

quality indicators, measuring instrument, metrological characteristics, metrological reliability, life cycle, multiple model

Abstract

 

Modern measuring instruments (MI) are of great importance for providing measurements in all areas of the national economy. Their main purpose is to conduct accurate and reliable measurements in order to obtain complete and reliable measurement information. To perform this important function, MI must be of appropriate quality, which must be reliably assessed.

In the traditional definition, MI is a technical means that is used in measurements and has standardized characteristics. For technical means, there is a traditional system of quality indicators. In addition to these quality indicators, additional specific indicators should be established for MI, which should objectively assess the metrological characteristics.

The expediency of creating and using a special system of quality indicators for all stages of the MI life cycle is proved. Building such a system requires maximum use of quantitative characteristics that express certain quality indicators. Important indicators of this system are a number of MI indicators related to metrological characteristics. For MI, it is also advisable to use a common system of quality indicators for technical facilities.

The proposed multiple models of MI quality indicators and evaluation of MI quality indicators allow studying the influence of MI quality indicators and performing their evaluation at all stages of the MI life cycle. Understanding and managing the system for evaluating MI quality indicators helps to increase efficiency in achieving planned results. For effective implementation of these models, it is necessary to use regulated requirements of some international and regional standards and recommendations

Author Biographies

Oleh Velychko, State Enterprise “All-Ukrainian State Scientific and Production Centre for Standardization, Metrology, Certification and Protection of Consumer” (SE “Ukrmetrteststandard”)

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Director

Scientific and Production Institute of Electromagnetic Measurements

Oleh Hrabovskyi, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Communications

PhD, Associate Professor, Dean

Faculty of Metrology, Automation and Electronics

Tetyana Gordiyenko, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Communications

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Standardization, Conformity Assessment and Educational Measurements

Serhii Volkov, State University of Intellectual Technologies and Communications

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Automated Systems and Information and Measurement Technologies

References

  1. ISO 9000:2015. Quality management systems. Fundamentals and vocabulary (2015). ISO, 51.
  2. Faskhiev, Kh. A. (2015). Innovative mechanisms of providing competitiveness of goods when developing. Innovatsii, 3 (197), 77–88.
  3. Kutuzova, K. Yu. (2015). Ponyatie kachestva produktsii i etapy ego evolyutsii. Innovatsionnaya ekonomika: perspektivy razvitiya i sovershenstvovaniya, 1 (6), 106–111.
  4. Tsvetkov, V. Y. (2017). Evolution of the quality management. Educational resources and technology, 1 (18), 64–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.21777/2312-5500-2017-1-64-71
  5. Lisyutina, A. I. (2020). Product quality: concept and characteristics of quality. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Tehnicheskie nauki, 3, 282–285.
  6. ISO 9001:2015. Quality management systems. Requirements (2015). ISO, 29.
  7. ISO 10012:2003. Measurement management systems. Requirements for measurement processes and measuring equipment (2003). ISO, 19.
  8. ISO/IEC 17025:2017. General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories (2017). ISO/IEC, 30.
  9. ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007. International vocabulary of metrology. Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) (2007). ISO/IEC, 92.
  10. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008. Uncertainty of measurement. Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995) (2008). ISO/IEC, 120.
  11. Sokolovskyi, S. A., Pavlov, S. P., Cherkashyna, M. V., Naumenko, M. O., Hrabovskyi, Ye. M. (2015). Upravlinnia yakistiu vyrobnytstva ta obcluhovuvannia. Kharkiv: NANHU, 264.
  12. Biletskyi, E. V., Yanushkevych, D. A., Shaikhlislamov, Z. R. (2015). Upravlinnia yakistiu produktsiyi ta posluh. Kharkiv: KhTEI, 222.
  13. Yan, S., Yan, X. (2020). Joint monitoring of multiple quality-related indicators in nonlinear processes based on multi-task learning. Measurement, 165, 108158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108158
  14. Ravber, M., Mernik, M., Črepinšek, M. (2017). The impact of Quality Indicators on the rating of Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms. Applied Soft Computing, 55, 265–275. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.01.038
  15. Skopa, A., Volkov, S., Grabowski, О. (2013). Quality indicators and life cycles of protected information-measuring systems. Visnyk Skhidnoukrainskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Dalia, 15 (1), 192–198.
  16. Grabowski, O., Nakonechna, T., Volkov, S. (2012). Quality indicators and life cycles of information-measuring systems. Collection of scientific works of the Odesa State Academy of Technical Regulation and Quality, 1 (1), 17–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.32684/2412-5288-2012-1-1-17-23
  17. Velychko, O., Gordiyenko, T., Hrabovskyi, O. (2018). Testing of measurement instrument software on the national level. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (9 (92)), 13–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.125994
  18. Velychko, O., Gaman, V., Gordiyenko, T., Hrabovskyi, O. (2019). Testing of measurement instrument software with the purpose of conformity assessment. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (9 (97)), 19–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.154352
  19. Mykyichuk, M. (2013). Alhorytm otsiniuvannia indyvidualnoi metrolohichnoi nadiynosti zasobiv vymiriuvalnoi tekhniky. Vymiriuvalna tekhnika ta metrolohiya, 74, 98–103. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/metrolog_2013_74_23
  20. Mykyychuk, M., Lazarenko, N., Lazarenko, S., Riznyk, A. (2019). Development of system of providing metrological reliability of measuring instruments. Measuring Equipment and Metrology, 80 (3), 53–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.23939/istcmtm2019.03.053
  21. Bondarenko, S., Leus, A. (2017). Evaluation of quality of products at the enterprise. Efektyvna ekonomika, 4.
  22. Sakovich, L. M., Krichovetsky, G. Ya., Nebesna, Ya. E. (2018). Evaluation of metrological reliability of measuring instruments for the duration of maintenance of communication special. Control, Navigation and Communication Systems, 2 (48), 164–166. doi: https://doi.org/10.26906/sunz.2018.2.164
  23. Vasilevskyi, O., Didych, V. (2018). Estimating inter-verification intervals of measuring devices. International Scientific-technical journal «Measuring and Computing Devices in Technological Processes», 2, 23–29.
  24. Yeremenko, V., Mokiychuk, V., Redko, O. (2017). Method for the Determination of Calibration Intervals of Measuring Instruments of the Testing Laboratory, 5-1 (67), 68–77.
  25. ILAC-G24/OIML D10:2007. Guidelines for the determination of calibration intervals of measuring instruments. ILAC/OIML, 11.
  26. RMG 74-2004. State system ensuring the uniformity of measurements. Methods for determining the intervals of verification and calibration of measuring instruments (2006). Moscow. Available at: https://meganorm.ru/Index2/1/4293853/4293853594.htm

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Velychko, O., Hrabovskyi, O., Gordiyenko, T., & Volkov, S. (2021). Modeling of a system of quality assessment indicators of measuring instruments . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(9 (110), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.228853

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 9 (110) (2021): Information and controlling system

Section

Information and controlling system

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Олег Миколайович Величко, Олег Вікторович Грабовський, Тетяна Богданівна Гордієнко, Сергій Леонідович Волков

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.