Definition of conceptual basics of nanoeconomics as inclusive society environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.243072

Keywords:

inclusive economics, nanoeconomics, babyeconomics, human economics, economic integration and isolation, individualistic functions of inclusion

Abstract

The definition of nanoeconomics can relate to different levels and areas of economic life. First of all, this is the nanolevel of the economic system. As a human economy, nanoeconomics provides for the allocation of an individual factor within the framework of a socio-economic phenomenon. The nanoeconomic aspect is central to the definition of inclusion. So, the inclusion of a person, as the main subject of nanoeconomics, to the formation and stabilization of economic systems is the initial one in the integration of an individual in relation to production processes and economic development. A person is involved in academic and social life by making decisions about their own business and integrating it into the sectoral and national economic space. It is proved that its indicators are the conditions for clustering the economic system. The study carried out a cluster analysis of the innovation system in a country with an economy in transition.

In addition, the study outlined that inclusive phenomena in the economy are close to integration and are the opposite of segregation and isolation. It is noted that different institutions of integration can be used to form objective conditions for the development of babyeconomics. Public decisions of inclusion involve the use of Arrow's impossibility theorem.

The research results can be used:

– the individualistic functions of inclusion should be used in the formation of the babyeconomics, the human economy and the economy of nanotechnology;

– states of inclusion must be created at all levels of the economic system;

– a person and wealth are an individualistic aspect of an inclusive economy, because national wealth consists of individual wealth.

Nanoeconomics is just beginning to be included in the systemic processes of inclusive economic phenomena, especially in countries with economies in transition

Author Biographies

Tetiana Ostapenko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Foreign Economic Activity Enterprise Management

Igor Britchenko, State Higher Vocational School Memorial of Prof. Stanislaw Tarnowski in Tarnobrzeg

Doctor of Science in Economics, Professor

Valentyna Marchenko, National Technical University Of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

References

  1. Uniyat, A. V., Yuzvin, Z. I. (2019). The concept of inclusive economy in the context of modern sustainable development of countries. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2019.2.55
  2. Komarova, V., Mietule, I., Arbidane, I., Tumalavičius, V., Prakapienė, D. (2021). Will production in the modern world and its regions return to a slow growth regime? Economic Annals-ХХI, 187 (1-2), 4–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v187-01
  3. Marchenko, O. S. (2020). Inkliuzyvnyi pidkhid u sferi konsaltynhu ta profesiyni posluhy “PRO BONO”. Materialy mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi Internet-konferentsiyi: Inkliuzyvnyi rozvytok ekonomiky v umovakh hlobalnykh vyklykiv sohodennia. Kharkiv, 4–6. Available at: https://science.kname.edu.ua/images/dok/konferentsii/2020konf/1-28__.pdf
  4. Bobukh, I. M., Shchegel, S. M. (2018). Strategic environments of economic growth in Ukraine: inclusiveness as a key priority. Visnik Nacional’noi’ Academii’ Nauk Ukrai’ni, 7, 55–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2018.07.055
  5. Dunska, A., Zhaldak, H. (2021). The influence of endogenous innovative sources on the development of exports of industrial enterprises. Economic Annals-ХХI, 187 (1-2), 99–113. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v187-10
  6. Tkalich, T. (2018). Inclusive economy as a model of world economic growth. Naukovyi visnyk MNU imeni V.O. Sukhomlynskoho. Ekonomichni nauky, 1 (10), 93–98. Available at: http://www.mdu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/Econom-visnyk-10-17.pdf
  7. Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. New-York.
  8. Pererva, P., Usov, M., Chernobrovkina, S., Larka, L., Rudyka, V. (2021). Methods for Assessing the Investment Attractiveness of Innovative Projects. Studies of Applied Economics, 39 (6). doi: https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i6.5167
  9. Tsapko-Piddubna, O. (2021). Inclusive growth policy and institutional assessment: the case of Central and Eastern European countries. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7 (2), 233–239. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-233-239
  10. Benko, N. (2021). Dominants of development and reproduction of human capital as a strategic component of change. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 7 (2), 28–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-2-28-36
  11. Barash, Y., Kryvytskyi, Y., Ablamskyi, S. (2018). External experience for the execution of exchange regulation and possibilities of its application in Ukraine. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4 (1), 25–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-1-25-30

Downloads

Published

2021-10-31

How to Cite

Ostapenko, T., Britchenko, I., & Marchenko, V. (2021). Definition of conceptual basics of nanoeconomics as inclusive society environment. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(13 (113), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.243072

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology