Determination of productivity of milking cows and emissions of greenhouse gases from organic waste with different approaches to the organization of the technology of their feeding

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.243115

Keywords:

tethered housing, dairy cows, milk productivity, greenhouse gases, multicriteria analysis

Abstract

The analysis of approaches to reduce the consumption of fodder protein and greenhouse gas emissions from organic waste in milk production is carried out, and the need to determine these indicators for various approaches to organizing the technology of their feeding is established.

An increase in the content of difficult-to-digest protein in the diets of high-yielding cows made it possible to reduce greenhouse gas emissions per head per day by 14.12 % in CO2 equivalent when using 1.5 kg of TEP-mix in the ration of cows. When using 1.0 kg of TEP-mix, this figure was 6.44 %. In terms of 1 kg of milk with basic fat content, these indicators are 26.72 % and 12.98 %, respectively.

A multicriteria analysis of milk production with different approaches to organizing the technology of feeding dairy cows and, in particular, when using the additive TEP-mix with a protected protein showed a significant advantage of research option No. 1 (1.5 kg of TEP-mix). For it, the objective function according to the considered criteria is the smallest and amounts to 0.039 in comparison with the idealized variant. At the same time, the target function of the control variant (without TEP-mix) is 2.67 times worse, and for the experimental variant No. 2 (1.0 kg of TEP-mix) this indicator is 2.12.

The use of TEP-mix in feeding cows provided an increase in their milk productivity, milk fat and protein content and, as a result, the profitability of milk production.

The studies have found that the use of the proposed approaches to the organization of the technology of feeding cows provides an increase in their productivity, a decrease in the cost of feed protein and an improvement in environmental protection. According to the authors, this is due to an increase in the content of difficult-to-digest protein in the diets of high-yielding cows

Author Biographies

Andriy Zolotarov, Institute of Animal Science of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Researcher

Department of Food, Physiology of Nutrition of Farm Animals and Feed Production

Viktor Piskun, Institute of Animal Science of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Senior Researcher

Laboratory of Technologies in Cattle Breeding

Angrej Pilipcenko, Agroindustrial Group Arnika

Director

Evqen Rudenko, Institute of Animal Science of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Department of Assessment and Monitoring of the Quality of Livestock Products and Feed

Svitlana Zolotarova, Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaiev

PhD

Department of Livestock and Poultry Technologies

Aleksei Trishin, Institute of Animal Science of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor, Academician of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine

Laboratory of Economics and Organization of Production of Livestock Products

Yuriy Yatsenko, Poltava State Agrarian University

PhD

Department of Technologies and Means of Mechanization of Agricultural Production

References

  1. Piskun, V., Osipenko, T., Sikun, M. (2020). Greenhouse gas emissions from by-products during charolet meat breeding. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten Instytutu tvarynnytstva NAAN, 124, 134–146. doi: https://doi.org/10.32900/2312-8402-2020-124-134-146
  2. Malaga-Tobola, U., Kocira, S. (2013). Intensity of the Production Organisation in Organic and Conventional Dairy Farms. Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development, 27 (1), 153–165. Available at: http://www1.up.poznan.pl/jard/index.php/jard/article/view/601
  3. Walczak, J., Szewczyk, А. (2013). Środowiskowe uwarunkowania ekologicznego chowu bydła mlecznego. Wiadomości Zootechniczne, LI (3), 81–92. Available at: https://wz.izoo.krakow.pl/files/WZ_2013_3_art09.pdf
  4. The Humane Society of the United States, "An HSUS Report: The Impact of Animal Agriculture on Global Warming and Climate Change" (2008). Impact of Animal Agriculture. Available at: https://www.wellbeingintlstudiesrepository.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=hsus_reps_environment_and_human_health
  5. Mokliachuk, L. I., Zhukorskyi, O. M. Pinchuk, V. O., Mineralov O. I., Keivan, O. P. (2012). Ahroekolohichna otsinka vykydiv spoluk aktyvnoho azotu u sektori silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy. Ahroekolohichnyi zhurnal, 2, 36–42.
  6. Yanyshyn, Ya. S., Kashuba, Yu. P. (2013). The development of the domestic diry cattle-breeding within the context of global market trends. Ekonomika APK, 4, 82–85.
  7. Bionaz, M., Hurley, W., Loor, J. (2012). Milk Protein Synthesis in the Lactating Mammary Gland: Insights from Transcriptomics Analyses. Milk Protein. doi: https://doi.org/10.5772/46054
  8. Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., Stern, M. D. (2005). Nitrogen Metabolism in the Rumen. Journal of Dairy Science, 88, E9–E21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7
  9. Lee, C., Hristov, A. N., Heyler, K. S., Cassidy, T. W., Lapierre, H., Varga, G. A., Parys, C. (2012). Effects of metabolizable protein supply and amino acid supplementation on nitrogen utilization, milk production, and ammonia emissions from manure in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95 (9), 5253–5268. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5366
  10. Broderick, G. A., Stevenson, M. J., Patton, R. A. (2009). Effect of dietary protein concentration and degradability on response to rumen-protected methionine in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 92 (6), 2719–2728. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1277
  11. Mane, S. H., Mandakmale, S. D., Nimbalkar, C. A., Kankhare, D. H., Lokhande, A. T. (2017). Economics of feeding protected protein and protected fat on crossbred cattle. Indian Journal Of Animal Research, 51 (6), 1080–1085. doi: https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.v0iof.9154
  12. Rotz, C. A. (2018). Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 101 (7), 6675–6690. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13272
  13. Pinchuk, V. (2015). Greenhouse gas emissions in livestock Ukraine. Biological Resources and Nature Management, 7 (1-2), 115–118.
  14. Rotz, C. A., Holly, M., de Long, A., Egan, F., Kleinman, P. J. A. (2020). An environmental assessment of grass-based dairy production in the northeastern United States. Agricultural Systems, 184, 102887. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102887
  15. Ramin, M., Fant, P., Huhtanen, P. (2021). The effects of gradual replacement of barley with oats on enteric methane emissions, rumen fermentation, milk production, and energy utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 104 (5), 5617–5630. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19644
  16. Bittante, G., Cecchinato, A. (2019). Heritability estimates of enteric methane emissions predicted from fatty acid profiles, and their relationships with milk composition, cheese-yield and body size and condition. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 19 (1), 114–126. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051x.2019.1698979
  17. O’Brien, D., Shalloo, L., Grainger, C., Buckley, F., Horan, B., Wallace, M. (2010). The influence of strain of Holstein-Friesian cow and feeding system on greenhouse gas emissions from pastoral dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 93 (7), 3390–3402. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2790
  18. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/WG1AR5_SummaryVolume_FINAL.pdf
  19. Viktorov, P. I., Men'kin, V. K. (1991). Metodika i organizatsiya zootekhnicheskih opytov. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 112.
  20. Vlizlo, V. V., Fedoruk, R. S., Makar, I. A. (2004). Dovidnyk: Fizioloho-biokhimichni metody doslidzhen u biolohiyi, tvarynnytstvi ta veterynarniy medytsyni. Lviv, 399.
  21. Bohdanov, H. O., Kandyba, V. M. (Eds.) (2012). Normy i ratsiony povnotsinnoi hodivli vysokoproduktyvnoi velykoi rohatoi khudoby. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, 296.
  22. Igglestov, H. S., Buendia, L., Miva, K. et. al. (2006). Rukovodyashchie printsipy natsional'nyh inventarizatsiy parnikovyh gazov. Podgotovleno Programmoy MGEIK po natsional'nym kadastram parnikovyh gazov.
  23. Piskun, V. I., Yatsenko, Yu. V., Yatsenko, Yu. Yu. (2020). The concept of optimization of technological solutions of agricultural production. Modern engineering and innovative technologies, 12 (1), 5–11.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-31

How to Cite

Zolotarov, A., Piskun, V., Pilipcenko, A., Rudenko, E., Zolotarova, S., Trishin, A., & Yatsenko, Y. (2021). Determination of productivity of milking cows and emissions of greenhouse gases from organic waste with different approaches to the organization of the technology of their feeding. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(10 (113), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.243115

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 10 (113) (2021): Ecology

Section

Ecology

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Andriy Zolotarov, Viktor Piskun, Angrej Pilipcenko, Evqen Rudenko, Svitlana Zolotarova, Aleksei Trishin, Yuriy Yatsenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.