Economic evaluation of digital marketing management at the enterprise

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.254485

Keywords:

digital marketing management, economic evaluation, advertising campaign, SWOT analysis

Abstract

The meaning of the “digital marketing management” concept that takes into account the role of customer impressions and emotional response as prerequisites for activating targeted actions is clarified. It is proved in the paper that one of the most important criteria of digital marketing management effectiveness is the formation of user impressions.

The issues of digital marketing management evaluation are generalized. It was found that modern methods of economic evaluation do not take into account the emotional component of content perception. It is proposed to introduce qualitative evaluation of impressions along with quantitative methods of digital marketing management. Digital marketing formats are systematized according to the ability to track customer feedback after interacting with a particular format. It was found that the most popular formats of digital marketing in 2021 were those that take feedback into account. In particular, companies spend their budgets for SMM – 75 %, banner advertising – 71 %, and for sharing they mostly choose social networks: Facebook – 88 %, Instagram – 78 %, Google – 75 % and YouTube – 71 %.

Methodical recommendations to substantiate the economic evaluation of digital marketing management are proposed. Based on the concept of impression economy, the method of assessing the impressions of users by reviewing their reactions on social networks is analyzed. SWOT analysis of user impressions is made, and it is proposed to choose digital content, which is more emotional.

The proposed methodological recommendations reflect the results of the effectiveness of digital marketing management both in quantitative (assessment of absolute and relative indicators) and qualitative forms (assessment of impressions)

Author Biographies

Yuliia Tataryntseva, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Accounting and Finance

Oleksandr Pushkar, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Computer Systems and Technologies

Olena Druhova, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Finance and Credit

Svitlana Osypova, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Accounting and Finance

Anastasiya Makarenko, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute"

Senior Lecturer

Department of Accounting and Finance

Oleksandr Mordovtsev, Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and Administrative Management

References

  1. Kak izmenilsya rynok e-grocery v Ukraine i mire v 2021 godu. Dannye Zakaz.ua. Available at: https://retailers.ua/news/mneniya/13090-kak-izmenilsya-ryinok-e-grocery-v-ukraine-i-mire-v-2021-godu-dannyie-zakazua
  2. Dunayev, I., Kud, A., Latynin, M., Kosenko, A., Kosenko, V., Kobzev, I. (2021). Improving methods for evaluating the results of digitizing public corporations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (13 (114)), 17–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.248122
  3. Vasyl’tsiv, N. M., Rozhko, N. Ya. (2018). Modern trends of digital marketing. Ekonomika i suspilstvo, 15, 232–236. Available at: https://economyandsociety.in.ua/journals/15_ukr/36.pdf
  4. Pain, Dzh., Hilmor, H. (2020). Ekonomika vrazhen: bytva za chas, uvahu ta hroshi klienta. Alpina pablisher, 368.
  5. Pushkar, O., Kurbatova, Y., Druhova, O. (2017). Innovative methods of managing consumer behaviour in the economy of impressions, or the experience economy. Economic Annals-ХХI, 165 (5-6), 114–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v165-23
  6. Ugolkov, I., Karyy, O., Skybinskyi, O., Ugolkova, O., Zhezhukha, V. (2020). The evaluation of content effectiveness within online and offline marketing communications of an enterprise. Innovative Marketing, 16 (3), 26–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/im.16(3).2020.03
  7. Xiao, L., Zhang, Y., Fu, B. (2019). Exploring the moderators and causal process of trust transfer in online-to-offline commerce. Journal of Business Research, 98, 214–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.01.069
  8. Hrabovskyi, Y., Yevsyeyev, O., Pandorin, A. (2018). Development of a method for the creation of 3D advertising printing products. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (2 (96)), 6–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.147325
  9. Davidaviciene, V., Meidute-Kavaliauskiene, I., Paliulis, R. (2019). Research on the Influence of Social Media on Generation Y Consumer Purchase Decisions. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 39–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-04
  10. Hitka, M., Pajtinkova-Bartakova, G., Lorincova, S., Palus, H., Pinak, A., Lipoldova, M. et. al. (2019). Sustainability in Marketing through Customer Relationship Management in a Telecommunication Company. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 194–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-16
  11. Epstein, M. J., Yuthas, K. (2007). Evaluating the effectiveness of Internet marketing initiatives. Management Strategy. Available at: https://www.cimaglobal.com/Documents/ImportedDocuments/Tech_MAG_Evaluating_Internet_Marketing_April06.pdf
  12. Blyzniuk, V. (2021). Metrics in digital marketing of trade enterprises. Marketing and Digital Technologies, 5 (2), 36–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.15276/mdt.5.2.2021.4
  13. Raudeliūnienė, J., Davidavičienė, V., Tvaronavičienė, M., Jonuška, L. (2018). Evaluation of Advertising Campaigns on Social Media Networks. Sustainability, 10 (4), 973. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10040973
  14. Krizanova, A., Lăzăroiu, G., Gajanova, L., Kliestikova, J., Nadanyiova, M., Moravcikova, D. (2019). The Effectiveness of Marketing Communication and Importance of Its Evaluation in an Online Environment. Sustainability, 11 (24), 7016. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247016
  15. Hartman, K. (2020). Digital marketing analytics: in theory and in practice. Ostmen Bennettsbridge Publishing Services, 265.
  16. Oklander, M. A., Romanenko, O. O. (2015). Specific differences in digital marketing from internet marketing. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrainy "Kyivskyi politekhnichnyi instytut", 12, 362–371. Available at: http://dspace.opu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/6799/1/evntukpi_2015_12_54.pdf
  17. Biloš, A., Ružić, I., Kelić, I. (2014). Online and Offline Media Effectiveness Based on Shopping Center Communication Objectives. International Conference “An Enterprise Odyssey: Leadership, Innovation and Development for Responsible Economy”. Zadar. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/262955424_Online_And_Offline_Media_Effectiveness_Based_On_Shopping_Center_Communication_Objectives
  18. García, D. A., García, S. G., Blanco, T. P., Sánchez, J. (2019). Integrated marketing communication in the digital environment. Advertiser attitudes towards online communication techniques. Estudos em Comunicação, 29, 241–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.25768/fal.ec.n29.a15
  19. Baranauskas, G. (2020). Digitalization Impact on Transformations of Mass Customization Concept: Conceptual Modelling of Online Customization Frameworks. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 120–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-09
  20. Koob, C. (2021). Determinants of content marketing effectiveness: Conceptual framework and empirical findings from a managerial perspective. PLOS ONE, 16 (4), e0249457. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249457
  21. Bennett, P. (2021). Marketing effectiveness: how to measure it & present to external stakeholders. HubSpot. Available at: https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/easy-ways-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-your-content
  22. John, S. P., De’Villiers, R. (2020). Elaboration of marketing communication through visual media: An empirical analysis. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 54, 102052. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102052
  23. Indzhiyev, A. A. (2021). Modern methodology for assessing the effectiveness of enterprise management in the IT sector. Innovatsii i investitsii, 2, 55–57. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennaya-metodologiya-otsenki-effektivnosti-upravleniya-predpriyatiyami-v-sfere-it
  24. Creating digital experiences for anxious audiences (2017). Available at: https://www.velir.com/ideas/2017/07/27/creating-digital-experiences-for-anxious-audiences
  25. Shkalova, A. (2021). Doslidzhennia digital-reklamy: khto ta kudy napravliav reklamni biudzhety. Available at: https://vctr.media/ua/doslidzhennya-digital-reklami-khto-ta-kudi-napryavlyav-reklamni-byudzheti-112543/
  26. Bondareva, O. (2021). Kak social selling pomogaet kompaniyam privlekat' klientov. Available at: https://admitad.academy/kak-social-selling-pomogaet-kompaniyam-privlekat-klientov/
  27. Savytska, O. M., Salabaj, V. O. (2019). Efficiency of activity and management of the enterprise: features of application of theory, methodology and performance of analytical researches. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 6. doi: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2019.6.55

Downloads

Published

2022-04-28

How to Cite

Tataryntseva, Y., Pushkar, O., Druhova, O., Osypova, S., Makarenko, A., & Mordovtsev, O. (2022). Economic evaluation of digital marketing management at the enterprise . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13 (116), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.254485

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 13 (116) (2022): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Yuliia Tataryntseva, Oleksandr Pushkar, Olena Druhova, Svitlana Osypova, Anastasiya Makarenko, Aleksandr Mordovtsev

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.