Identification of target system operations. determination of the value of the complex costs of the target operation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35950

Keywords:

target operation, complex costs, resource intensity of target operation, costs of operation

Abstract

Currently, the increase in financial returns from economic operations is constrained in view of the lack of a single efficiency criterion, which allows uniquely identify the business operation by their main feature - the possibility of obtaining the maximum value added (profit).

One of the main scientific steps on the way to obtaining the formula of efficiency is developing the "resource intensity" indicator. The development of this indicator was based on the model of the deployed operation and determination of the time of the actual completion of the target operation, which does not coincide with the traditional notion of the time of completion of economic operations.

For processes with distributed parameters, an expression for determining the resource intensity using numerical methods was derived.

For economic operations, which can be reduced to simple operations, an analytical expression of resource intensity was obtained.

Using mathematical modeling methods it was revealed that in the case of a fixed value of expert (cost) estimate of output products of the operation, the minimum resource intensity of the operation indicates a maximum efficiency operation with respect to the target product of the operation.

Development of the resource intensity of economic operations is the final step towards the development of cybernetic (interdisciplinary) efficiency indicator that allows to maximize the value added (profit) of economic operations.

Author Biography

Igor Lutsenko, National unіversitet them. M. Ostrogradskii 39600, Kremenchug, Str. Day, 20

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Electrical and electricity savings

References

  1. Lutsenko, I.(2014). Deployed model of extremal system operation for solving optimal management problems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5/2 (71), 61–66. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28592
  2. Ehrlenspiel, K., Kiewert, A., Lindemann, U. (2007). Cost-Efficient Design. Springer, 544.
  3. Lapygin, Y., Prokhorov, N. (2007). Cost Management in the enterprise. Eksmo, 102.
  4. Berk, J. (2010). Cost Reduction and Optimization for Manufacturing and Industrial Companies. Wiley, 258. doi: 10.1002/9780470643815
  5. Ghiani, G., Laganà, D., Manni, E., Musmanno, R., Vigo, D. (2014). Operations research in solid waste management: A survey of strategic and tactical issues. Computers & Operations Research, 44, 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.006
  6. Tsai, J.-T., Fang, J.-C., Chou, J.-H. (2013). Optimized task scheduling and resource allocation on cloud computing environment using improved differential evolution algorithm. Computers & Operations Research, 40 (12), 3045–3055. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.06.012
  7. Zheng, Y.-J.,Ling, H.-F., Xue, J.-Y. (2014). Ecogeography-based optimization: Enhancing biogeography-based optimization with ecogeogrephic barriers and differentiations. Computers & Operations Research, 50, 115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.04.013
  8. Lutsenko, I.(2014) Identification of target system operations. 1. Determination of the time of the actual completion of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6/2 (72), 42-47. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28040
  9. Lutsenko,I.A. (2014). Samples. Krivoy Rog. Available at: http://uk.effli.info/index.php/samples
  10. Lutsenko, I. (2014). Systems engineering of optimal control I. Synthesis of the structure of the technological product conversion system (part 1). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6/2 (72), 28–37. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28724

Published

2015-02-27

How to Cite

Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. determination of the value of the complex costs of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(2(73), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35950