Analysis of approaches to constructing bi-adaptive management systems of project-oriented enterprises

Authors

  • Юрій Миколайович Тесля Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko st. University, 81, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680, Ukraine
  • Олександр Георгійович Тімінський Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Str. Volodymyrska, 64/13, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8265-6932

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.39988

Keywords:

project management system, enterprise management system, adaptability, bi-adaptive systems

Abstract

Approaches to constructing project management systems relatively used standards were investigated. Advantages and disadvantages of each approach were identified. The main principles, underlying the project management system operation were formulated. As a result of studies, it was found that the mutual adaptability of the project management system and the enterprise management system was underinvestigated. As one of the principles of constructing composite management systems, the adaptability principle was outlined. The concept of bi-adaptability was introduced. The definition of bi-adaptability as the property of adaptability implementation in two ways was given. The definition of the bi-adaptive management system of the project-oriented enterprise was presented. The methodological, information and organizational tools to ensure bi-adaptability were considered. As an element base of adaptability implementation, frames were proposed. The advantages of this approach were described. The definition of structurally-producing approach to constructing the bi-adaptive management system was given. The fundamental tasks of the bi-adaptive management system of the project-oriented enterprise were formulated. The scientific task of constructing the bi-adaptive management systems of the project-oriented enterprise was set. The proposed approach to constructing such systems based on frame models will allow to build a more effective management system of the project-oriented enterprise through introducing a better mechanism of its adaptation to changes in the internal and external environment.

Author Biographies

Юрій Миколайович Тесля, Kyiv National Taras Shevchenko st. University, 81, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03680

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Faculty of Information Technology

Олександр Георгійович Тімінський, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Str. Volodymyrska, 64/13, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01601

Associate professor, Candidate of technical sciences, dean

The department of management technologies

References

  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide), 5th еdition (2013). PMI, USA, 589.
  2. ICB: IPMA Competence Baseline Version 3.0. IPMA (2006). Netherlands, 200.
  3. ISO 21500:2012. Guidance on project management (2012). Project Committee ISO/PC 236, 36.
  4. Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (10th ed.). USA, New Jersey: Wiley, 1120.
  5. Teslya, Y. N., Oberemok, I. I., Timinsky, O. G. (2009). Models and methods of implementation of corporate project management system in development. Project management and development of production, SNU n. a. V. Dahl, 1 (29), 28–35.
  6. Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0). Draft Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (1993). Computer Systems Laboratory of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA, 183.
  7. Juran, J. M., Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran’s quality handbook. 5th edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 1730.
  8. Bushuyev, S. D. (2009). Guidelines for management of innovative projects and programs: Vol. 1, Version 1.2. Naukovyi Svit, Kyiv, Ukraine, 173.
  9. Ichak, A. (1983). How to Solve the Mismanagement Crisis: Diagnosis and Treatment of Management Problems. Adizes Institute, USA, 281.
  10. Bushuyeva, N. S. (2008). Matrix technology of proactive organizational development program management. Project and Program Management. Kyiv National University of construction and architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine, 40.
  11. Neizvestny, S. I. (2013). Development of methodologies for project management with the use of mechanisms of convergence. Project and Program Management. Kyiv National University of construction and architecture, Kyiv, Ukraine, 39.
  12. Oberemok, I. I. (2014). Bending approach for the implementation of the corporate project management systems. Management of development of difficult systems, 17, 42–45.
  13. Marvin, M.; Winston P. H. (Ed.) (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge. The Psychology of Computer Vision. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, 76.

Published

2015-04-20

How to Cite

Тесля, Ю. М., & Тімінський, О. Г. (2015). Analysis of approaches to constructing bi-adaptive management systems of project-oriented enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3(74), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.39988

Issue

Section

Control processes