Development of the method for testing of efficiency criterion of models of simple target operations

Igor Lutsenko, Elena Vihrova, Elena Fomovskaya, Olga Serdiuk

Abstract


The problem of verification of indicators which are supposed to be used as criteria of efficiency of models of simple target operations is solved. For realization of such opportunity, it is offered to test the indicators on couples of reference models of simple target operations, the efficiency of which is calculated previously with the help of the developed technique and predictive indicator.

Now more than one thousand indicators are developed, which the authors-developers define as efficiency indicators. As the criterion of efficiency is a global criterion of optimization, the indicator offered for the solution of optimization tasks has to provide an adequate assessment of efficiency of the optimized process in the whole range of management. This is particularly relevant for the automatic control systems.

As a result of the research, it is established that the efficiency of target operations in some cases can be defined by using a method of a direct assessment of the process that is generated by the initial target operation. For this purpose, performance of a number of conditions is necessary: the studied target operation has to be simple; the compared operations have to be comparable relative to the starting investments; it is necessary to consider not only the data from the process generated by the cyclic performance of target operations, but also from the processes generated by the use of their target product.

The received results allow revealing the indicators that can be used to solve the optimization problems by the criterion of efficiency. Such opportunity allows passing from a paradigm of process automation to full automation of management processes by the criterion of resource efficiency.


Keywords


efficiency; method of direct efficiency evaluation; reference models of simple target operations

References


Golovin, A. A., Kurasova, I. I., Chzhan-Sen, A. Ju. (2014). Faktory formirovanija pribyli v APK. Agrarnyj vestnik Urala, 1 (119), 80–83.

Demchuk, O. V., Aref'eva, S.G. (2015). Pribyl' i rentabel'nost' predprijatija: sushhnost', pokazateli i puti povyshenija. Problemy jekonomiki i menedzhmenta, 8 (48), 6–9.

Ghiani, G., Laganà, D., Manni, E., Musmanno, R., Vigo, D. (2014). Operations research in solid waste management: A survey of strategic and tactical issues. Computers & Operations Research, 44, 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.006

Zheng, Y.-J., Ling, H.-F., Xue, J.-Y. (2014). Ecogeography-based optimization: Enhancing biogeography-based optimization with ecogeographic barriers and differentiations. Computers & Operations Research, 50, 115–127. doi: /10.1016/j.cor.2014.04.013

Makarevich, O. A. (2012). Modeli ocenki jekonomicheskoj jeffektivnosti i sistemnogo (sinergicheskogo) jeffekta tehnologicheski integrirovannoj proizvodstvennoj sistemy. Politematicheskij setevoj jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 75, 1–21.

Baholdina, I. V., Shherbinina, Ju. V. (2013). Pribyl' na akciju kak instrument ocenki jeffektivnosti delovoj aktivnosti jekonomicheskogo sub’ekta. Upravlenie jekonomicheskimi sistemami, 11, (59).

Kisel'nikov, E. A., Sorochajkin, A. N., Tjukavkin, N. M. (2013). Ocenka strategii povyshenija jeffektivnosti funkcionirovanija predprijatij mashinostroenija na osnove kapitalizacii pribyli. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4 (105), 34–42.

Maiju, V., Lonnqvis, A., Schiuma, G. (2014). Development of key performance indicators and impact assessment for SHOKs . Publication of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy Innovation, 27, 47.

Sun, Y. (2015). A new management model of university scientific research funds based on the BSC. Education Management and Management Science, 303–306.

Cirlin, A. M. (1986). Optimal'noe upravlenie tehnologicheskimi processami. Jenergoatomizdat, 400.

Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. Development of global efficiency criterion of target operations. Eastern–European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/2 (74), 35–40. doi: 10.15587/1729–4061.2015.38963

Lutsenko, I. (2015). Identification of target system operations. 2. Determination of the value of the complex costs of the target operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/2 (73), 31–36. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35950


GOST Style Citations


1. Golovin, A. A. Faktory formirovanija pribyli v APK [Text] / A. A. Golovin, I. I. Kurasova, A. Ju. Chzhan-Sen // Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. – 2014. – Vol. 1 (119). – P. 80–83.

2. Demchuk, O. V. Pribyl' i rentabel'nost' predprijatija: sushhnost', pokazateli i puti povyshenija [Text] / O. V. Demchuk, S. G. Aref'eva // Problemy jekonomiki i menedzhmenta. – 2015. – Vol. 8 (48). – P. 6–9.

3. Ghiani, G. Operations research in solid waste management: A survey of strategic and tactical issues [Text] / G. Ghiani, D. Laganà, E. Manni, R. Musmanno, D. Vigo // Computers & Operations Research. – 2014. – Vol. 44. – P. 22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2013.10.006 

4. Zheng, Y.-J. Ecogeography–based optimization: Enhancing biogeography–based optimization with ecogeogrephic barriers and differentiations [Text] / Y.-J. Zheng, H.-F. Ling, J.-Y. Xue // Computers & Operations Research. – 2014. – Vol. 50. – P. 115–127. doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2014.04.013 

5. Makarevich, O. A. Modeli ocenki jekonomicheskoj jeffektivnosti i sistemnogo (sinergicheskogo) jeffekta tehnologicheski integrirovannoj proizvodstvennoj sistemy [Text] / O. A. Makarevich // Politematicheskij setevoj jelektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kubanskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. – 2012. – Vol. 75. – P. 1–21.

6. Baholdina, I. V. Pribyl' na akciju kak instrument ocenki jeffektivnosti delovoj aktivnosti jekonomicheskogo sub’ekta [Text] / I. V. Baholdina, Ju. V. Shherbinina // Upravlenie jekonomicheskimi sistemami. – 2013. – Vol. 11 (59).

7. Kisel'nikov, E. A. Ocenka strategii povyshenija jeffektivnosti funkcionirovanija predprijatij mashinostroenija na osnove kapitalizacii pribyli [Text] / E. A. Kisel'nikov, A. N. Sorochajkin, N. M. Tjukavkin. // Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. – 2013. – Vol. 4 (105). – P. 34–42.

8. Maiju, V. Development of key performance indicators and impact assessment for SHOKs [Text] / V. Maiju, A. Lonnqvis, G. Schiuma // Publication of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy Innovation . – 2014. – Vol. 27. – P. 47.

9. Sun, Y. A new management model of university scientific research funds based on the BSC [Text] / Y. Sun // Education Management and Management Science. – 2015. – P. 303–306.

10. Cirlin, A. M. Optimal'noe upravlenie tehnologicheskimi processami [Text] / A. M. Cirlin. – Jenergoatomizdat, 1986. – 400 p.

11. Lutsenko, I. Identification of target system operations. Development of global efficiency criterion of target operations [Text] / I. Lutsenko // Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. – 2015. – Vol. 2, Issue 2 (74). – P. 35–40. doi: 10.15587/1729–4061.2015.38963

12. Lutsenko, I. Identification of target system operations. 2. Determination of the value of the complex costs of the target operation [Text] / I. Lutsenko // Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. – 2015. – Vol. 1, Issue 2 (73). – P. 31–36. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2015.35950



DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.66307

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Elena Vihrova, Igor Lutsenko, Elena Fomovskaya, Olga Serdiuk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN (print) 1729-3774, ISSN (on-line) 1729-4061