DOI: https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2019.177326

Dissatisfaction with the State as a Concomitant Phenomenon of the Voidness of Cultural Discourse Meanings

Valerii Sivers

Abstract


Purpose of Research. The purpose of the article is to analyze the concept of «voidness» as an essential characteristic of the modern cultural discourse in the context of the analysis of the institution of the state that leads to the dissatisfaction with it. Methodology. The research methodology involves a combination of the following methods: dialectical, phenomenological, comparative, historical, and onto-gnoseological ones. The latter is based on the formation of ideas about the basic parameters, taking into account the consequences of the temporary perception and understanding of the researched phenomenon. Scientific Novelty. The scientific novelty of the research focuses on the terms of the «voidness of the meanings of the discourse of culture» and «the axiological verification of the text». The mentioned «voidness» means the process of the formation of cultural meanings, which does not get closer to the syncretization of the myphonarativs as the basic value structure of individual and collective consciousness but multiplies distances among its realization. The idea is substantiated by ontological, cultural and ethical arguments. The concept of «the axiological verification of the text» is the development of the ethical argument, given in the article. Conclusions. Understanding the idea of the voidness of discourse of cultural meanings and the use of the axiological text verification allow us operating with the stereotypical schemes and phasing of the established forms of scientific analysis in the field of socio-humanitarian subjects to overcome the effect of distance from their essence. We are talking about simultaneously bringing the arguments in the traditional logic of perception, which gives rise to the phenomenological «wrapper» of a thing, and the opposed axiological verification procedure.


Keywords


voidness; progress; contradiction; state; discourse; meaning; ontological; cultural; ethical; axiological verification

References


Баронин А. С. Этническая психология. Киев : Тандем, 2000. 264 с.

Бауман З. Индивидуализированое общество. Москва : Гражданский проект, 2002. 344 с.

Бергсон А. Творческая эволюция. Москва : ТЕРРА – Книжный клуб; КАНОН-прес-Ц, 2001. 384 с.

Вілков В. Ю., Погорілий А. О. Культурологічна теоретична модель національної спільноти «духу народу»: (частина друга). Вісник Київського національного університету ім. Тараса Шевченка. Філософія. Політологія. 2015. Вип. 1. С. 13 – 18.

Галанина Е. В. Миф как реальность и реальность как миф: мифологические основания современной культуры. Москва : Академия естествознания, 2013. 129 с.

Докинз Р. Эгоистичный ген. Москва: АСТ, Corpus, 2013. 501 с.

Морозов А. Ностальгія як феномен культури. Українські культурологічні студії. 2018. 2(3). С.13 – 18

Степанова О. А. Концептуальні засади становлення і розвитку національного культурного простору України: моногр. Київ; Ніжин: Лисенко М. Москва, 2017. 416 с .

Фрейд З. Недовольство культурой. Москва : Фолио, 2013. 222 с.

Ovcharuk O. V. Methodological aspects of comprehension of human being in theculturological scientific paradigm. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв. 2018. № 3. С. 3 – 9.

Pezzey J. C.-V., Toman M.-A. The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of journal Articles. URL: https://web.archive.org/web/20140408214704/http://www.rff.org/documents/rff-dp-02-03.pdf (з екрану 15.04.2019)

Baronin, A. S. (2000). Ethnic Psychology. Kyiv: Tandem [in Russian].

Bauman, Z. (2002). Individualized Society. Moscow: Grazhdanskii proekt [in Russian].

Bergson, H. (2001). Creative Evolution. Moscow : TERRA, KANON [in Russian].

Vilkov, V. Yu. & Pogorilyi, A.O. Culturological and Theoretical Model of the National Community «the Spirit of the People»: (part two). (2015). Visnyk Kyivskogo Nationalnogo Universytety im. Taras Shevchenko. Philosophia. Politologia, 1, 13 – 18 [in Ukrainian].

Galanina, E. V. (2013). Myth as Reality and Reality as a Myth: Mythological Foundations of Modern Culture. Moscow : Academia Estestvoznania [in Russian].

Dawkins, R. (2013). The Selfish Gene. Moscow : AST: Corpus [in Russian].

Morozov, A. (2018). Nostalgia as a Phenomenon of Culture. Ukraiinski culturologichni studii, 2 (3), 13-18 [in Ukrainian].

Stepanova, O. A. (2017). Conceptual Principles of Formation and Development of the National Cultural space of Ukraine. Kyiv; Nizhyn: Lysenko MM [in Ukrainian].

Freud, S. (2013). Dissatisfaction with Culture. Moscow : Folio [in Russian].

Ovcharuk, O. V. (2018). Methodological aspects of comprehension of human being in theculturological scientific paradigm. Visnyk NAKKKiM, 3, 3 – 9 [in English].

Pezzey, J. C.-V. & Toman M.-A. (2002). The Economics of Sustainability: A Review of Journal Articles. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20140408214704/http://www.rff.org/documents/rff-dp-02-03.pdf [in English].