The Old Russian style: rethinking Hellenistic and Byzantine traditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.3.2018.147209Keywords:
pre-Mongol architecture, The Old Russian style, monumental construction, cathedral project, local traditions, baptismal pillar plan.Abstract
The purpose of the article refutes the opinion that the Old Russian style inherited the traditions of metropolitan Byzantine architecture, creatively reinterpreting them, which was established in the literature since the 50s of the twentieth century. The differences from Constantinople architecture were often treated as the original features of the Old Russian architecture. Nowadays, on the basis of excavations and systematization of the history of architecture of that time, scientists prove that the monumental architecture of Kievan Rus’ took the traditions of the Byzantine provinces, which were significantly different from the capital ones. The original Old Russian style was shaped only by the end of the XII century in the work of Miloneg with his aggrandized pyramidality of both interiors and the facade. Its origins occur not in the folk wooden architecture, but in the general tendencies of the development of the world architecture. The article shows the transformation of the Old Russian style under the influence of Gothic and Renaissance tendencies in the ХV century in the western Ukrainian lands.
References
Асеев Ю.С. Архитектура древнего Киева. К., 1982.
Архипова Е.И. Резной камень в архитектуре древнего Киева: Конец Х — первая половина ХІІІ в. К., 2005.
Баталов А. Л. Введение // ДРИ: Идея и образ. Опыты изучения византийского и древнерусского ис-кусства. М., 2009.
Комеч А.И. Древнерусское зодчество конца X - начала XII в. Византийское наследие и становление самостоятельной традиции. М., 1987.
Раппопорт П.А. Архитектура средневековой Руси. Избранные статьи. К 100-летию со дня рождения. — СПб. : Лики России, 2013.
Штендер Г.М. Трехлопастные покрытия церкви Спаса на Берестове: (К вопросу о художественном образе храмов второй половины XI — начала XII в.) // ПКНО, 1980. Л., 1981. С. 534–544.
Ричков П., Луц В. Архітектурно-мистецька спадщина князів Острозьких. К., 2002.
Aseev, Yu.S. (1982). Architecture of ancient Kyiv. Kyiv [in Russian].
Arkhipova, Ye.I. (2005). The carved stone in the architecture of ancient Kiev: The end of X - the first half of the ХІІІ century. Kyiv [in Russian].
Batalov, A. L. (2009). DRI: The idea and image. Experiments in the study of Byzantine and Old Russian art. Introduction. Moscow [in Russian].
Komech, A.I. (1987). Old Russian architecture of the end of X - beginning of the XII century. Byzantine heritage and the formation of an independent tradition. Moscow [in Russian].1987.
Rappoport, P.A. (2013). The architecture of medieval Russia. Selected articles. To the 100th anniversary of the birth. St. Petersburg: Liki Rossii [in Russian].
Shtender, G.M. (1981). Three-lobed coverings of the Church of the Savior on Berestov: (To the question of the artistic image of the temples of the second half of the XI - the beginning of the XII century.) PKNO, 1980. Lenin-grad, 1981 [in Russian].
Rychkov, P., & Luc, V. (2002). Architectural-mystical spadshchina of Ostrozjkyj’s princes. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).