Development and study of technological visual programming of logic control problems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.118833

Keywords:

problem-oriented language, tabular cyclogram, automation of programming, programmable logic controller

Abstract

The approach to logic control programming using a technological language was described. It is based on the use of a tabular cyclogram directly as a programming language. It was shown that using a cyclogram, it is possible to describe the complete algorithm of logic control of industrial equipment, and with its use to generate automatically a program code in standard languages of programming of industrial controllers. This approach will make it possible to involve engineers-technologists, who are the most competent experts in the field of automated process, in the process of developing and debugging of control programs.

The benefits of technological visual programming in comparison with the conventional approach to control programming were described. The requirements for the necessary structure of a specialized programming environment with the use of a tabular language of technological cyclograms were stated. During experiments in the developed environment, the authors described in the cyclogram language the algorithm of controlling a portal industrial robot, by which a specialized translator automatically generated the complete program code in the language of IEC 61131-3 standard for PLC microprocessor. In addition, within the proposed approach, the authors described the possibility to generate automatically a complete description of a logical controlling automatic machine of increased reliability in HDL-language using the same cyclogram and the template.

Technological visual programming makes it possible to involve engineers-technologists directly in the process of control programming, which decreases labor consumption of developing control systems and enhances the quality of a program code. The technological cyclogram itself can be widely used by various specialists at the stages of launch-adjusting operations, maintenance and modernization of control systems, and as technical documentation during the operational phase

Author Biographies

Ilya Furman, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Alchevskyh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Automation and Computer-Integrated Technologies

Alexander Allashev, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Alchevskyh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Assistant

Department of Automation and Computer-Integrated Technologies

Aleksey Piskarev, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Alchevskyh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Automation and Computer-Integrated Technologies

Stanislav Bovchaliuk, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Alchevskyh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automation and Computer-Integrated Technologies

References

  1. IEC 61131-3. Programmable controllers. Part 3: Programming languages (1998). Int. Electrotechnic Commission.
  2. Zyubin, V. E. (2005). Programmirovanie PLK: yazyki MEK 61131-3 i vozmozhnye al'ternativy. Promyshlennye ASU i kontrollery, 11, 31–35.
  3. Shalyto, A. A. (1998). Switch-tekhnologiya. Algoritmizatsiya i programmirovanie zadach logicheskogo upravleniya. Sankt-Peterburg: Nauka, 628.
  4. John, K. H., Tiegelkamp, M. (2001). IEC 61131-3: Programming Industrial Automation Systems. Concepts and Programming Languages, Requirement for Programming Systems, Decision-Making Tools. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12015-2
  5. Sinichkin, S. G. (2008). Programmiruemye kontrollery i ih primenenie dlya modernizatsii sistem upravleniya tekhnologicheskim oborudovaniem. Nizhniy Novgorod, 211.
  6. Demenkov, N. P. (2004). Yazyki programmirovaniya promyshlennyh kontrollerov. Moscow: Izd-vo MGTU im. N. E. Baumana, 172.
  7. Parr, E. (2007). Programmiruemye kontrolery: rukovodstvo dlya inzhenera. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratoriya znaniy, 516.
  8. Tatarchevskiy, V. A. (2007). Problemy primeneniya yazykov standarta IEC 61131-3 i vozmozhnye puti resheniya. Informatsionno- matematicheskie tekhnologii v ekonomike, tekhnike i obrazovanii. Ekaterinburg: UGTU-UPI, 239–241.
  9. Dubinin, V., Vyatkin, V., Pfeiffer, T. (2005). Engineering of Validatable Automation Systems Based on an Extension of UML Combined With Function Blocks of IEC 61499. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. doi: 10.1109/robot.2005.1570732
  10. Zyubin, V. E. (2006). «Si s protsessami»: yazyk programmirovaniya logicheskih kontrollerov. Mekhatronika, 12, 31–35.
  11. Yang, C. (John), Vyatkin, V. (2009). Automated Model Transformation between MATLAB Simulink/Stateflow and IEC 61499 Function Blocks. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 42 (4), 205–210. doi: 10.3182/20090603-3-ru-2001.0302
  12. Shah, A. A., Kerzhner, A. A., Schaefer, D., Paredis, C. J. J. (2010). Multi-view Modeling to Support Embedded Systems Engineering in SysML. Graph Transformations and Model-Driven Engineering, 580–601. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-17322-6_25
  13. Allashev, O. Yu., Furman, I. O. (2015). Prohramuvannia lohichnykh kontroleriv z vykorystanniam tekhnolohichnykh mov korystuvachiv. Enerhetyka ta kompiuterno-intehrovani tekhnolohiy v APK, 1 (3), 76–77.
  14. Baltrushaytis, V. V. (1998). "GRAFIT-FLOKS" – tekhnologiya razrabotki programmnogo obespecheniya bortovyh vychislitel'nyh mashin. Sistemy i kompleksy avtomaticheskogo upravleniya v kosmonavtike i narodnom hozyaystva, 79–81.
  15. Furman, I. A., Krasnobaev, V. A., Malinovskiy, M. A., Panchenko, S. V. (2006). Kontrollery i protsessory s parallel'noy arhitekturoy. Kharkiv: UkrGAZHT, 416.
  16. Malinovskiy, M. L., Furman, I. A., Konishcheva, A. P., Allashev, A. Yu., Svyatobat'ko, A. V. (2010). Kontseptsiya sozdaniya tablichnyh yazykov opisaniya apparatury. Radioelektronni i kompiuterni systemy, 6, 289–291.
  17. Spinellis, D. (2001). Notable design patterns for domain-specific languages. Journal of Systems and Software, 56 (1), 91–99. doi: 10.1016/s0164-1212(00)00089-3
  18. Wenger, M., Zoitl, A., Froschauer, R., Rooker, M., Ebenhofer, G., Strasser, T. (2010). Model-driven engineering of networked industrial automation systems. 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics. doi: 10.1109/indin.2010.5549621
  19. Parr, T. (2010). Language Implementation Patterns. Create Your Own Domain-Specific and General Programming Languages. Pragmatic Bookshelf, 380.
  20. Evans, E. (2004). Domain-Driven Design: Tackling the Complexity in the Heart of Software. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley, 560.
  21. Pollack, S. L., Hicks, H., Harrison, W. (1970). A decision table approach to system analysis. ACM SIGMIS Database, 2 (1), 6–12. doi: 10.1145/1040700.1040701
  22. Engelien, M. (1980). Rekursive Projektierung von Algorithmen und Entscheidungstabellentechnik. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der TU Dresden, 29 (3/4), 873–880.
  23. Hambi, E. (1976). Programmirovanie tablits resheniy. Moscow: Mir, 86.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-25

How to Cite

Furman, I., Allashev, A., Piskarev, A., & Bovchaliuk, S. (2017). Development and study of technological visual programming of logic control problems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(2 (90), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.118833