Development of cleaning methods complex of industrial gas pipelines based on the analysis of their hydraulic efficiency

Authors

  • Oleksandr Filipchuk Department of Ground Infrastructure PJSC «Ukrgazvydobuvannya» Kudryavska str., 26/28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-1663
  • Vladimir Grudz Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1182-2512
  • Victor Marushchenko Department of Ground Infrastructure PJSC «Ukrgazvydobuvannya» Kudryavska str., 26/28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8732-2712
  • Valentyn Myndiuk Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2926-3157
  • Myroslav Savchuk Department of Ground Infrastructure PJSC «Ukrgazvydobuvannya» Kudriavska str., 26/28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.126590

Keywords:

hydraulic efficiency coefficient, gas gathering and transportation system, pressure loss, breakaway emissions, pollution volume

Abstract

The majority of gas and gas condensate fields of Ukraine are developed by pressure depletion, which makes it possible to stabilize production only in conditions of low working pressures at the wellhead. In turn, the working pressure values significantly depend on the pressure at the inlet to the gas gathering stations and pressure loss in the gas gathering and transportation process. Consequently, their reduction will lead to an increase in natural gas production from depleted fields.

The main idea of the work is to offer continuous monitoring of the gas gathering system in order to detect changes in the thermobaric operation mode. Such changes can signal the high probability of liquid accumulation, which will produce additional friction.

The results of monitoring changes in pressure, temperature, dew points and natural gas composition allow carrying out their complex analysis and evaluating the possibility of liquid mass formation in certain areas of the gas pipeline system with an acceptable accuracy, which at once excludes a more detailed recording of their presence by means of instrument equipment and human resources, as well as reduces the time of non-response to a problem. The works may be fully executed by the operations technician or the dispatch service. After detecting potentially hazardous places, they are analyzed for confirmation of the presence of liquid and the decision to clean them with one of the proposed methods is made.

This approach will be very interesting to large international companies, since natural gas reserves are constantly exhausted, and withdrawal of the remaining gas from depleted fields is an attractive target for producing companies. In addition, the use of simple pigging methods based on the analysis of the hydraulic efficiency of pipelines can significantly reduce both time and material resources.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Filipchuk, Department of Ground Infrastructure PJSC «Ukrgazvydobuvannya» Kudryavska str., 26/28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053

Manager

Division for the Collection, Preparation and Transport of Hydrocarbons

Vladimir Grudz, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department for the Construction and Repair of Gas Pipelines and Gas Reservoirs

Victor Marushchenko, Department of Ground Infrastructure PJSC «Ukrgazvydobuvannya» Kudryavska str., 26/28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053

Head

Valentyn Myndiuk, Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas Karpatska str., 15, Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine, 76019

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Energy Management and Technical Diagnostics

Myroslav Savchuk, Department of Ground Infrastructure PJSC «Ukrgazvydobuvannya» Kudriavska str., 26/28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04053

Head of Sector

Sector of industrial pipelines and electrochemical protection

References

  1. Kovalko, M. P., Hrudz, V. Ya., Mykhalkiv, V. B. et. al.; Kovalko, M. P. (Ed.) (2002). Truboprovidnyi transport hazu. Kyiv: Ahentstvo z ratsionalnoho vykorystannia enerhiyi ta ekolohiyi, 600.
  2. Odishariya, G. E. (1976). Gidravlicheskiy raschet rel'efnyh truboprovodov pri neznachitel'nom soderzhanii zhidkosti v potoke gaza. Gazovaya promyshlennost', 42–43.
  3. Zaycev, Yu. V. (1978). Vliyanie haraktera gazozhidkostnogo potoka na effektivnost' ingibitornoy zashchity. Gazovaya promyshlennost', 2, 17–19.
  4. Muhin, V. E. (1971). Strukturnye formy techeniya gazozhidkostnyh smesey v trubah. Gazovoe delo, 1, 13–15.
  5. Goldberg, V., Mc Kee, F. (1985). Model Predicts Liquid Accumulation Severe Terrain Induced Slugging for Two-Phase Lines. Oil&Gas Journal.
  6. Kaptsov, I. I., Bratakh, M. I., Vynnyk, S. M. et. al. (2001). Vyznachennia obiemu vidkladiv u diuchomu hazoprovodi ta yoho hidravlichnoi efektyvnosti. Problemy rozvytku hazovoi promyslovosti Ukrainy, 95–99.
  7. Vecherik, R. L., Rudnyk, A. A., Kotok, V. B., Tkach, O. I., Bantiukov, Ye. M., Vynohradets, S. O. et. al. (2002). Pat. No. 49764 UA. Sposib kontroliu utvorennia hidrativ u hazoprovodi. 6F17D3/00. No. 2002064609; declareted: 05.06.2002; published: 16.09.2002, Bul. No. 9.
  8. Chelombitko, H. O., Volchkov, I. I., Khaietskyi, Yu. B., Kotok, V. B., Bantiukov, Ye. M., Dolhopolov, S. H. et. al. (2002). Pat. No. 49762 UA. Sposib kontroliu utvorennia hidrativ u hazoprovodi. 6F17D3/00. No.2002064607; declareted: 05.06.2002, published: 16.09.2002, Bul. No. 9.
  9. Bruk, V. A., Hordiyenko, I. A., Dutchak, I. O. (2002). Do pytannia zapobihannia hidratoutvorennia v mahistralnykh hazoprovodakh. Pytannia rozvytku hazovoi promyslovosti Ukrainy, 150–153.
  10. Bruk, V. A. (1985). Pat. SSSR No. 1247624. Sposob opredeleniya zagryaznennosti magistral'nogo gazoprovoda. declareted: 19.02.1985; published: 30.07.1986, Bul. No. 28.
  11. Darin, L. G. (2010). Natural gas quality workshop. Session 2. Effects of Poor Gas Quality and Causes of Sample Distortion. An SGAnetwork Web Conference.
  12. Rudnik, A. A. et. al. (1999). Pat. No. 34697 UA. Sposib kontroliu hidravlichnoho stanu mahistralnoho hazoprovodu. declareted: 01.04.1999; published: 15.03.2001, Bul. No. 2.
  13. Bruk, V. A. (2002). Vyznachennia rezhymiv roboty ta hidravlichnoi efektyvnosti hazoprovodu u vypadku neizotermichnykh techiyi. Pytannia rozvytku hazovoi promyslovosti Ukrainy, 154–158.
  14. SOU 09.1-30019775-246:2015. Metodyka vyznachennia hidravlichnoho stanu hazoprovodiv systemy zboru i transportuvannia hazu z rodovyshch PAT «Ukrhazvydobuvannia» (2015). UkrNDIhaz, 43.
  15. Pal'chikov, V. P., Maslov, V. M., Luchanskiy, V. E. (1989). Beskontaktnyy sposob indikacii urovnya zhidkih otlozheniy v gazoprovodnyh sistemah. Peredovoy proizvodstvennyy i nauchno-tekhnicheskiy opyt, rekomenduemiy dlya vnedreniya v gazovoy promyshlennosti, 2, 48–52.
  16. Robert, J., Purinton, Jr. (1982). Pat. No. US4473408A. Cleaning pipeline interior with gelled pig. No. 4,473,408; declareted: 12.01.1982; published: 25.09.1984.
  17. Moshfeghian, M., Johannes, A. H., Maddox, R. N. (2002). Thermodynamic Properties are Important in Predicting Pipeline Operations Accurately. Oil&Gas Journal, 100 (5), 56–62.
  18. Norris, H. L., Rydahl, A. (2003). Simulation reveals conditions for onshore arctic gas-condensate pipeline. Oil&Gas Journal.
  19. Mokhatab, S. (2002). Correlation predicts pressure drop in gas-condensate pipelines. Oil&Gas Journal, 66–67.
  20. VNTP 51-1-85. Obshchesoyuznye normy tekhnologicheskogo proektirovaniya. Magistral'nye truboprovody. Chast' 1. Gazoprovody (1986). Moscow.
  21. Bratakh, M. I., Zaid Khalil Ibrakhim, Hrebeniuk, S. D. (2015). Vplyv hidravlichnoho stanu systemy promyslovykh hazoprovodiv na rezhym roboty obiektiv hazovydobuvnoho kompleksu. Intehrovani tekhnolohiyi ta enerhozberezhennia, 1, 22–26.
  22. Abdumula, M. F. (2004). Crude Oil Pipelines Inspection. Technology of Oil and Gas Forum and Exhibition.
  23. Horin, P. V., Tymkiv, D. F., Holubenko, V. P. (2017). Systematyzatsiya metodiv ochystky hazozbirnykh merezh dlia transportuvannia hazu zrilykh rodovyshch. Komunalne hospodarstvo mist. Seriya: Tekhnichni nauky ta arkhitektura, 134, 52–57.
  24. Abdumula, M. F. (2004). Heavy Hydrocarbon Testing Methodology. The Micro CAD International Scientific Conference Hungary – Miskolc.
  25. Abdumula,M. F. (2003). Influence of Paraffin Flocculation in Crude Oil Tran sported Pipelines with Economic View of Pigging Process. 1st International Conference and Exhibition in Oil Field Chemicals.
  26. Abdumula, M. F. (2004). Wax Precipitation in Crude Oil Tran sporting Pipelines. The Micro CAD International Scientific Conference Hungary – Miskolc.
  27. Al-Yaari, M. (2011). Paraffin Wax Deposition: Mitigation and Removal Techniques. SPE Saudi Arabia Section Young Professionals Technical Symposium. doi: 10.2118/155412-ms
  28. Gupta, A., Sircar, A. (2016). Introduction to Pigging & a Case Study on Pigging of an Onshore Crude Oil Trunkline. IJLTEMAS, V (II), 18–25. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307583466_Introduction_to_Pigging_a_Case_Study_on_Pigging_of_an_Onshore_Crude_Oil_Trunkline
  29. Winston Revie, R. (Ed.) (2011). Uhlig's Corrosion Handbook. Wiley, 1296.
  30. Shymanovskyi, R. V., Stetsiuk, S. M., Bratakh, M. I., Koliadenko, V. A. (2017). Zvit pro naukovo-doslidnu robotu «Monitorynh ta analiz hidravlichnoho stanu systemy hazoprovodiv, po yakykh transportuietsia haz z rodovyshch HPU «Shebelynkahazvydobuvannia». Kharkiv, 193.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-22

How to Cite

Filipchuk, O., Grudz, V., Marushchenko, V., Myndiuk, V., & Savchuk, M. (2018). Development of cleaning methods complex of industrial gas pipelines based on the analysis of their hydraulic efficiency. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(8 (92), 62–71. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.126590

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment