Theoretical and experimental assessments of accuracy of nonorthogonal mems sensor arrays

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.131945

Keywords:

dynamic analysis, experimental tests, МЕМС sensor, nonorthogonal configuration, measuring error, redundant measuring instrument, theoretical assessment

Abstract

The paper deals with theoretical and practical assessments of nonorthogonal configurations of MEMS sensors based on both the uniaxial gyroscopes and the triaxial inertial measuring units. The main goal of the paper is research of the possibility to use nonorthogonal redundant configurations in navigation applications. Methods of inertial navigation, analytical mechanics, mathematical statistics and simulation were used in the research. Analysis of nonorthogonal redundant configurations of uniaxial MEMS sensor arrays including matrices of directional cosines has been carried out. Description of nonorthogonal redundant MEMS sensor array based on inertial measuring units (MPU-6050) is represented. Tables of directional cosines for nonortogonal redundant MEMS arrays based on inertial measuring units with such constructive elements as triangular and tetragonal pyramids are obtained. The mutual location of measuring axes for these configurations is given. Features of dynamic test including equipment possibilities and technique of random errors determination are described. Using of the three-degree-of-freedom test bench provides the simulation of the developed MEMS sensor arrays in conditions close to the real operation. The theoretical assessment of accuracy of nonorthogonal redundant MEMS sensor arrays based on both the uniaxial gyroscopes and the triaxial inertial measuring units is carried out. The assessment is implemented using correlation matrices of errors. The experimental assessment of the MEMS array based on triaxial inertial measuring units is determined based on the results of the dynamic analysis. The appropriate graphical dependences including graphs of relative variances and histograms of the random errors distribution are presented. Comparative analysis of the obtained assessments is given. The results can be useful for the design of navigation systems, for example, unmanned aerial vehicles or rockets for the launch of satellites into orbit.

Author Biographies

Olha Sushchenko, National Aviation University Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Aerospace Control Systems

Yurii Bezkorovainyi, National Aviation University Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Aerospace Control Systems

Nataliia Novytska, National Aviation University Komarova ave., 1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03058

Assistant

Department of Aerospace Control Systems

References

  1. Pejsa, A. J. (1974). Optimum Skewed Redundant Inertial Navigators. AIAA Journal, 12 (7), 899–902. doi: 10.2514/3.49378
  2. Epifanov, A. D. (1975). Nadezhnost' sistem upravleniya. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 144.
  3. Epifanov, A. D. (1978). Izbytochnye sistemy upravleniya letatel'nymi apparatami. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 178.
  4. Dai, X., Zhao, L., Shi, Z. (2013). Fault Tolerant Control in Redundant Inertial Navigation System. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 1–11. doi: 10.1155/2013/782617
  5. Rogne, R. H., Bryne, T. H., Fossen, T. I., Johansen, T. A. (2018). Redundant MEMS-Based Inertial Navigation Using Nonlinear Observers. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 140 (7), 071001. doi: 10.1115/1.4038647
  6. Song, J. W., Park, C. G. (2016). Optimal Configuration of Redundant Inertial Sensors Considering Lever Arm Effect. IEEE Sensors Journal, 16 (9), 3171–3180. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2015.2510545
  7. Jafari, M. (2015). Optimal redundant sensor configuration for accuracy increasing in space inertial navigation system. Aerospace Science and Technology, 47, 467–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.09.017
  8. Jafari, M., Roshanian, J. (2012). Optimal Redundant Sensor Configuration for Accuracy and Reliability Increasing in Space Inertial Navigation Systems. Journal of Navigation, 66 (02), 199–208. doi: 10.1017/s0373463312000434
  9. Sushchenko, O. A., Golitsyn, V. O. (2016). Data processing system for altitude navigation sensor. 2016 4th International Conference on Methods and Systems of Navigation and Motion Control (MSNMC). doi: 10.1109/msnmc.2016.7783112
  10. Larin, V. B., Tunik, A. A. (2015). Fault-tolerant strap-down inertial navigation systems with external corrections. Applied and Computational Mathematics, 14 (1), 23–37.
  11. Larin, V. B., Tunik, A. A. (2013). On Inertial-Navigation System without Angular-Rate Sensors. International Applied Mechanics, 49 (4), 488–499. doi: 10.1007/s10778-013-0582-x
  12. Chikovani, V., Sushchenko, O., Tsiruk, H. (2016). Redundant information processing techniques comparison for differential vibratory gyroscope. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (7 (82)), 45–52. doi: 10.15587/1729-4061.2016.75206
  13. Parshin, A. P., Nemshilov, Y. A. (2016). Development of measurement UAV attitude control unit with non-orthogonal arrangement of sensing elements. Modern technics and technologies, 3. Available at: http://technology.snauka.ru/2016/03/9697
  14. Sushchenko, O. A., Bezkorovainyi, Y. N., Novytska, N. D. (2017). Nonorthogonal redundant configurations of inertial sensors. 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference Actual Problems of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Developments (APUAVD). doi: 10.1109/apuavd.2017.8308780
  15. MPU-6000 and MPU-6050 Product Specification. Available at: https://store.invensense.com/datasheets/invensense/MPU-6050_DataSheet_.pdf
  16. Lurie, A. I. (2002). Analytical mechanics. Springer, 864. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-45677-3

Downloads

Published

2018-05-23

How to Cite

Sushchenko, O., Bezkorovainyi, Y., & Novytska, N. (2018). Theoretical and experimental assessments of accuracy of nonorthogonal mems sensor arrays. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(9 (93), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.131945

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system