The effect of additive on combustion characteristics and cycle to cycle variations on si engine fueled by gasoline and bioethanol

Authors

  • Setia Abikusna Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424, Indonesia
  • Bambang Sugiarto Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424, Indonesia
  • Ratna Monasari Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424, Indonesia
  • Iqbal Yamin Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.147585

Keywords:

bioethanol, oxygenated, cylinder pressure, coefficient of variation, cycle to cycle variations, power, torque

Abstract

Currently, the main energy source is heavily dependent on fossil energy. The current transportation technology also uses fossil-derived energy sources to make vehicle engines are ignited. Also, the electricity that is currently enjoyed by billions of people resulted enormously from the use of fossil energy. Limitations of existing fossil energy sources and the issue of global warming have led many to expand on renewable energy and energy conservation to maintain energy availability. One of an alternative energy source that is currently being developed is the use of bioethanol as a mixture or replacement of fossil fuel. The use of bioethanol (C2H5OH) as a substitute for a mixture of fossil fuels affects the efficiency of the engine produced by fuel. This study examines the effect of a mixture of bioethanol gasoline (RON 80) on a single-cylinder spark ignition (SI) 125 cc engine that is carried out with variations in fuel mixtures (E0, E5, E10, and E15) with the addition of 0.5 vol % oxygenated cyclohexanol and this experimental test is carried out as much as 800 cycles for each fuel mixture, with throttle opening, maintained 100 %, and variations in engine speed at 4,000 rpm up to 8,500 rpm with engine speed increases every 500 rpm. Engine performance is measured by connecting a machine with a dynamometer, and the variation of cylinder pressure combustion is measured by a pressure transducer. The test results are expected to prove that the mixture of fuel with oxygenated cyclohexanol can reduce COVIMEP in the cycle to cycle variations (E10++ which is 4.24 %), so that torque fluctuations do not occur which results in reliable engine performance or vehicle driveability increase, besides that the performance of both power and torque becomes better

Supporting Agency

  • The authors would like to thank DRPM UI and RisTek DikTi RI for providing the grant TADOK 2018 and PDUPT No. 399/UN2.R3.1/HKP05.00/2018 in this research so that it can be completed well

Author Biographies

Setia Abikusna, Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424

Doctoral Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Bambang Sugiarto, Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424

Professor

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Ratna Monasari, Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424

Master Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Iqbal Yamin, Universitas Indonesia Depok, Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 16424

Master Student

Department of Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Data Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistic of Indonesia (2014). Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources.
  2. Zhuang, Y., Hong, G. (2014). Effects of direct injection timing of ethanol fuel on engine knock and lean burn in a port injection gasoline engine. Fuel, 135, 27–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.06.028
  3. Yao, Y.-C., Tsai, J.-H., Wang, I.-T. (2013). Emissions of gaseous pollutant from motorcycle powered by ethanol–gasoline blend. Applied Energy, 102, 93–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.041
  4. Turkcan, A., Ozsezen, A. N., Canakci, M. (2014). Experimental investigation of the effects of different injection parameters on a direct injection HCCI engine fueled with alcohol–gasoline fuel blends. Fuel Processing Technology, 126, 487–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.05.023
  5. Zhuang, Y., Hong, G. (2013). Primary investigation to leveraging effect of using ethanol fuel on reducing gasoline fuel consumption. Fuel, 105, 425–431. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.09.013
  6. Feng, R., Fu, J., Yang, J., Wang, Y., Li, Y., Deng, B. et. al. (2015). Combustion and emissions study on motorcycle engine fueled with butanol-gasoline blend. Renewable Energy, 81, 113–122. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.025
  7. Schifter, I., Diaz, L., Gómez, J. P Gonzalez, U. (2013). Combustion characterization in a single cylinder engine with mid-level hydrated ethanol–gasoline blended fuels. Fuel, 103, 292–298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.002
  8. Wang, X., Chen, Z., Ni, J., Liu, S., Zhou, H. (2015). The effects of hydrous ethanol gasoline on combustion and emission characteristics of a port injection gasoline engine. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 6, 147–154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2015.09.007
  9. Sen, A. K., Medina, A., Curto-Risso, P. L., Calvo Hernández, A. (2014). Effect of ethanol addition on cyclic variability in a simulated spark ignition gasoline engine. Meccanica, 49 (10), 2285–2297. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-014-9974-1
  10. Kaleli, A., Ceviz, M. A., Erenturk, K. (2015). Controlling spark timing for consecutive cycles to reduce the cyclic variations of SI engines. Applied Thermal Engineering, 87, 624–632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.05.042
  11. Heywood, J. (1988). Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals. McGraw-Hill, 960.
  12. Reyes, M., Melgar, A., Pérez, A., Giménez, B. (2013). Study of the cycle-to-cycle variations of an internal combustion engine fuelled with natural gas/hydrogen blends from the diagnosis of combustion pressure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 38 (35), 15477–15487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.071
  13. Phuangwongtrakul, S., Wechsatol, W., Sethaput, T., Suktang, K., Wongwises, S. (2016). Experimental study on sparking ignition engine performance for optimal mixing ratio of ethanol–gasoline blended fuels. Applied Thermal Engineering, 100, 869–879. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.02.084
  14. Abikusna, S., Sugiarto, B., Suntoro, D., Azami (2017). Low grade bioethanol for fuel mixing on gasoline engine using distillation process. AIP Conference Proceedings. doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4979235
  15. Abikusna, S., Sugiarto, B., Monasari, R., Aditya, R., Hendrawan, D. (2018). Performance analysis (WHP and torque) on SI engine fueled with low-grade bioethanol and oxygenated fuel additive. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 105, 012057. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012057
  16. Anand, T. N. C., Madan Mohan, A., Ravikrishna, R. V. (2012). Spray characterization of gasoline-ethanol blends from a multi-hole port fuel injector. Fuel, 102, 613–623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.06.107
  17. Catapano, F., Sementa, P., Vaglieco, B. M. (2016). Air-fuel mixing and combustion behavior of gasoline-ethanol blends in a GDI wall-guided turbocharged multi-cylinder optical engine. Renewable Energy, 96, 319–332. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.087
  18. Costa, R. C., Sodré, J. R. (2011). Compression ratio effects on an ethanol/gasoline fuelled engine performance. Applied Thermal Engineering, 31 (2-3), 278–283. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.09.007
  19. Huang, Y., Hong, G., Huang, R. (2015). Investigation to charge cooling effect and combustion characteristics of ethanol direct injection in a gasoline port injection engine. Applied Energy, 160, 244–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.059
  20. Kim, N., Cho, S., Min, K. (2015). A study on the combustion and emission characteristics of an SI engine under full load conditions with ethanol port injection and gasoline direct injection. Fuel, 158, 725–732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.025
  21. Li, L., Ge, Y., Wang, M., Peng, Z., Song, Y., Zhang, L., Yuan, W. (2015). Exhaust and evaporative emissions from motorcycles fueled with ethanol gasoline blends. Science of The Total Environment, 502, 627–631. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.09.068
  22. Li, Y., Meng, L., Nithyanandan, K., Lee, T. H., Lin, Y., Lee, C. F., Liao, S. (2016). Combustion, performance and emissions characteristics of a spark-ignition engine fueled with isopropanol-n-butanol-ethanol and gasoline blends. Fuel, 184, 864–872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.07.063
  23. Liu, H., Wang, Z., Long, Y., Wang, J. (2015). Dual-Fuel Spark Ignition (DFSI) combustion fuelled with different alcohols and gasoline for fuel efficiency. Fuel, 157, 255–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.042
  24. Liu, H., Wang, Z., Long, Y., Xiang, S., Wang, J., Fatouraie, M. (2015). Comparative study on alcohol–gasoline and gasoline–alcohol Dual-Fuel Spark Ignition (DFSI) combustion for engine particle number (PN) reduction. Fuel, 159, 250–258. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.06.059
  25. Masum, B. M., Masjuki, H. H., Kalam, M. A., Palash, S. M., Habibullah, M. (2015). Effect of alcohol–gasoline blends optimization on fuel properties, performance and emissions of a SI engine. Journal of Cleaner Production, 86, 230–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.032
  26. Melo, T. C. C. de, Machado, G. B., Belchior, C. R. P., Colaço, M. J., Barros, J. E. M., de Oliveira, E. J., de Oliveira, D. G. (2012). Hydrous ethanol–gasoline blends – Combustion and emission investigations on a Flex-Fuel engine. Fuel, 97, 796–804. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.018
  27. Najafi, G., Ghobadian, B., Yusaf, T., Safieddin Ardebili, S. M., Mamat, R. (2015). Optimization of performance and exhaust emission parameters of a SI (spark ignition) engine with gasoline–ethanol blended fuels using response surface methodology. Energy, 90, 1815–1829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.07.004
  28. Reyes, M., Tinaut, F. V., Melgar, A., Pérez, A. (2016). Characterization of the combustion process and cycle-to-cycle variations in a spark ignition engine fuelled with natural gas/hydrogen mixtures. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41 (3), 2064–2074. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.10.082
  29. Sileghem, L., Wallner, T., Verhelst, S. (2015). A quasi-dimensional model for SI engines fueled with gasoline–alcohol blends: Knock modeling. Fuel, 140, 217–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.091
  30. Suarez-Bertoa, R., Zardini, A. A., Keuken, H., Astorga, C. (2015). Impact of ethanol containing gasoline blends on emissions from a flex-fuel vehicle tested over the Worldwide Harmonized Light duty Test Cycle (WLTC). Fuel, 143, 173–182. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.076
  31. Wang, Z., Liu, H., Long, Y., Wang, J., He, X. (2015). Comparative study on alcohols–gasoline and gasoline–alcohols dual-fuel spark ignition (DFSI) combustion for high load extension and high fuel efficiency. Energy, 82, 395–405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.049

Downloads

Published

2018-12-20

How to Cite

Abikusna, S., Sugiarto, B., Monasari, R., & Yamin, I. (2018). The effect of additive on combustion characteristics and cycle to cycle variations on si engine fueled by gasoline and bioethanol. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(6 (96), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.147585

Issue

Section

Technology organic and inorganic substances