Processes of managing information infrastructure of a digital enterprise in the framework of the «Industry 4.0» concept

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.157765

Keywords:

management processes, information infrastructure, digital enterprise, digital economy, Industry 4.0

Abstract

A study of the management of the information infrastructure of a digital enterprise is conducted within the framework of the “Industry 4.0” concept. It is determined that modern digital technologies cause an exponential growth of data flows, for the effective functioning of which the need arises to transform a classic enterprise into digital. There are new business models, network structures based on collective methods of production and consumption, which transform traditional market relations and require the development of new solutions in the field of digital enterprise management. It is noted that the use of all elements (mobility; sociality; BPM, electronic document management system ERP finance and accounting; Big Data Analytics, business analytics) of modern information and communication technologies will increase the productivity and value of enterprises. It is determined that information and communication technologies allow to effectively interact with each other in certain sectors of production and ensure the optimization of any business processes using consumerization. Modern trends in the development of digital enterprises are identified and the prerequisites for the introduction of digitalization in the business space are marked. The constituent elements of the management process of the information infrastructure of a digital enterprise are structured, on the basis of which a model of the information infrastructure management process is proposed. The objectives of the digital infrastructure are substantiated, which are indicated: to increase the speed of decision-making, to increase the variability of processes depending on the needs and characteristics of the client, to reduce the number of employees involved in the process. The methodological foundations of the process of managing the information infrastructure of a digital enterprise are deepened in the context of the “Industry 4.0” concept

Author Biographies

Kateryna Andriushchenko, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman Peremohy ave., 54/1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Volodymyr Rudyk, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilia Shevchenka str., 13, Kamianets-Podilsky, Ukraine, 32300

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance

Olena Riabchenko, National University of the State Fiscal Service of Ukraine Universytetska str., 31, Irpin, Ukraine, 08201

Doctor of Juridical Sciences, PhD, Professor

Department of Administrative Law and Process and Customs Security 

Maryana Kachynska, Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs Lva Landau ave., 27, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61080

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Administrative Police Activity

Nataliia Marynenko, Ternopil Ivan Puluj National Technical University Ruska str., 56, Ternopil, Ukraine, 46001

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Finance

Lidiya Shergina, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman Peremohy ave., 54/1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Vita Kovtun, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman Peremohy ave., 54/1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Mariia Tepliuk, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman Peremohy ave., 54/1, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03057

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship

Alla Zhemba, Natіonal Unіvеrsіty of Watеr and Еnvіronmеntal Еngіnееrіng Soborna str., 11, Rivne, Ukraine, 33028

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of International Economic Relations

Oksana Kuchai, Kyiv National Linguistic University Velyka Vasylkivska srt., 73, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03150

PhD

Department of Tourism and Physical Education

References

  1. Negroponte, N. (1995). Being digital. New York, 243.
  2. Golden, B. (2014). As IDC Sees It, Tech's «Third Platform» Disrupts Everyone. CIO FROM IDG. Available at: https://www.cio.com/article/2377568/cloud-computing/as-idc-sees-it-tech-s-third-platform-disrupts-everyone.html
  3. Gardner, S. (2009). Nietzsche, the Self, and the Disunity of Philosophical Reason. Nietzsche on Freedom and Autonomy, 1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231560.003.0001
  4. Are you ready for the third generation of work? World economik forum. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/01/ready-third-generation-work-ai-future-pierre-nanterme
  5. Samuels, M. (2018). What is digital transformation? Everything you need to know about how technology is reshaping business. ZDNet. Available at: https://www.zdnet.com/article/what-is-digital-transformation-everything-you-need-to-know-about-how-technology-is-reshaping
  6. Shirer, M., Smith, E. (2017). IDC Forecasts Worldwide Spending on Digital Transformation Technologies to Reach $1.3 Trillion in 2018. IDC. Available at: https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS43381817
  7. Digital is not the answer – transformation is. MIT Management Executive Education. Available at: https://executive.mit.edu/blog/digital-is-not-the-answertransformation-is#.W1rJetUzY2w
  8. Yudina, T. N. (2016). Osmyslenie cifrovoy ekonomiki. Teoreticheskaya ekonomika, 3, 12–16.
  9. Banke, B. Sycheva, E. (2016). Kazahstan na puti k cifrovoy ekonomike. BCG REVIEW. Obozrenie. Special'niy vypusk: Kazahstan. The Boston Consulting Group.
  10. Interv'yu TAdviser s general'nym direktorom SberTekha Alisoy Mel'nikovoy. Tadviser. Available at: http://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Статья:Интервью_TAdviser_с_генеральным_директором_СберТеха_Алисой_Мельниковой
  11. Big & Fast Data: The Rise of Insight-Driven Business (2017). Сapgemini, 24. Available at: https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/big_fast_data_the_rise_of_insight-driven_business-report.pdf
  12. Baranov, M. (2016). Cifrovoe predpriyatie: prishlo vremya peremen. PC Week, 10.
  13. Dobrynin, A. P., Chernyh, K. Yu., Kupriyanovskiy, V. P., Kupriyanovskiy, P. V., Sinyagov, S. A. (2016). The Digital Economy – the various ways to the effective use of technology (BIM, PLM, CAD, IOT, Smart City, BIG DATA, and others). International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 4 (1), 4–11.
  14. Martin, C., Hageman Snabe, J., Nanterme, P. (2016). Digital Transformation Initiative. World Economic Forum, 71. Available at: http://reports.weforum.org/digital-transformation/wp-content/blogs.dir/94/mp/files/pages/files/dti-executive-summary-website-version.pdf
  15. Andriushchenko, K., Stefanyshyn, D., Sahaidak, M., Tepliuk, M., Buchynska, O., Rozmetova, E. et. al. (2018). Process of resources provision management of the enterprise's activity with consideration of gender factor. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (3 (96)), 6–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.150799
  16. Vremya obsudit' strategiyu i praktiku «Cifrovogo biznesa» (2016). Digital Enterprise Forum. Available at: http://www.digenforum.ru/about/index.php
  17. Schulman, D., Iyer, S., Van Kirk, G., Hajibashi, M. (2017). Be the new digital enterprise. Accenture Consulting, 12. Available at: https://www.accenture.com/t20171024T083850Z__w__/us-en/_acnmedia/Accenture/cchange/digital-enterprise/docs/Accenture-Digital-Enterprise-POV.pdf
  18. Industry 4.0: Building the digital enterprise (2016). PWC, 36. Available at: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/industries/industries-4.0/landing-page/industry-4.0-building-your-digital-enterprise-april-2016.pdf
  19. What «digital» really means (2015). McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/high-tech/our-insights/what-digital-really-means
  20. Westerman, G., Tannou, M., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., McAfee, A. (2017). The Digital Advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. Center for Digital Business, 24. Available at: https://www.capgemini.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/The_Digital_Advantage__How_Digital_Leaders_Outperform_their_Peers_in_Every_Industry.pdf
  21. Gartner Says Enterprise Application Software Spending Is Increasing Rapidly in India and China (2018). Gartner. Available at: https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3868263
  22. Sergeeva, Yu. (2018). Social'nye seti v 2018 godu: global'noe issledovanie. WebCanape. Available at: https://www.web-canape.ru/business/socialnye-seti-v-2018-godu-globalnoe-issledovanie/
  23. Atans, M., Fabl, P. (1968). Optimal'noe upravlenie. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 764.
  24. Brayson, A., Ho Yu-Shi (1972). Prikladnaya teoriya optimal'nogo upravleniya. Moscow: MIR, 544.
  25. Kalman, K. (1960). Contributions to the Theory of Optimal Control. Bol. Soc. Math., 5, 102–119.
  26. Letov, A. M. (1981). Matematicheskaya teoriya processov upravleniya. Moscow: Nauka, 256.
  27. Ayvazyan, S. A. (2001). Prikladnaya statistika. Osnovy ekonomiki. Moscow: Yuniti – Dana, 432.
  28. Eliseev, I. I. (Ed.) (2006). Ekonometrika. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 576.
  29. Heiets, V. M., Kyzym, M. O., Klebanova, T. S., Cherniak, O. I. et. al.; Heiets, V. M. (Ed.) (2006). Modeliuvannia ekonomichnoi bezpeky: derzhava, rehion, pidpryiemstvo. Kharkiv: VD INZhEK, 240.
  30. Fuhelo, P. M. (2008). Ekonomiko-matematychne modeliuvannia yak skladova systemy upravlinnia ryzykamy innovatsiy v silskohospodarskomu vyrobnytstvi. Materialy III Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsiyi «Suchasni problemy innovatsiynoho rozvytku derzhavy». Vol. 9. Dnipropetrovsk, 50–54.
  31. Andriushchenko, K. (2016). Formation of conceptual approaches to management of intellectual capital of knowledge considering hierarchical levels at the enterprise. International Journal of Critical Accounting, 8 (5/6), 379–395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijca.2016.10002493
  32. Andriushchenko, K. (2017). The formation of the system of intellectual capital management at enterprises. Technology audit and production reserves, 2 (4 (34)), 4–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2017.98178
  33. Andriushchenko, K. (2014). State-private partnership as a factor of development of transport communications maritime industry. Středoevropský vĕstnĺk pro vĕdu a výzkum, 2 (21), 43–48.
  34. Pawlak, Z. (1985). Rough sets and fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17 (1), 99–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-0114(85)80029-4
  35. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control, 8, 338–353. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  36. Raskin, L., Sira, O. (2016). Fuzzy models of rough mathematics. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (4 (84)), 53–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.86739
  37. Sira, O. V., Al-Shqeerat, K. H. (2009). A New Approach for Resolving Equations with Fuzzy Parameters. European Journal of Scientific Research, 38 (4), 619–625.
  38. Raskin, L., Sira, O. (2016). Method of solving fuzzy problems of mathematical programming. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (83)), 23–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.81292

Downloads

Published

2019-02-26

How to Cite

Andriushchenko, K., Rudyk, V., Riabchenko, O., Kachynska, M., Marynenko, N., Shergina, L., Kovtun, V., Tepliuk, M., Zhemba, A., & Kuchai, O. (2019). Processes of managing information infrastructure of a digital enterprise in the framework of the «Industry 4.0» concept. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (97), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.157765

Issue

Section

Control processes