Traffic engineering in a software-defined network based on the decision-making method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.164686

Keywords:

traffic engineering, software defined network, fuzzy logic, throughput capacity, channels congestion, network reconfiguration

Abstract

One of the main control tasks in a computer network is to organize an effective system of information delivery; this task is of particular relevance in the software defined network. Conventional routing tools do not meet the requirements to service quality and the requirements for equitable distribution of congestion along communication channels. Routing in conventional networks is performed by the shortest path search based on a specified parameter, but these tools do not provide sufficient agility when changing routes in the network. Another drawback is the need to transmit regular updates of routing information by passing the service traffic, thereby dramatically increasing the congestion and reducing the throughput.

At present, the most effective way to ensure the assigned quality of service parameters, as well as a promising solution to organize efficient routing under conditions of uncertainty, is a software defined network. This new networking paradigm makes it possible to simplify the process of managing the network, to significantly enhance the use of network resources, and to reduce operating costs. One of the main advantages of such a network is control at the upper levels of the reference model, which makes it possible to simplify both the process of network management and the process to manage traffic in corporate networks and data center networks.

A new approach to traffic design in a software defined network has been proposed that employs the making-decision theory oriented towards routing exactly in such networks. If there is a «problematic area» and there is the need to overcome it, the decision-making theory under conditions of uncertainty is used, since the probability of selecting the best way to circumvent it accounts for the patterns in transmitted traffic. Such a method makes it possible to reduce the loss of inelastic traffic that is an important component of the overall amount of transmitted information. From a practical point of view, the algorithm constructed in this work, when compared to known algorithms for traffic engineering, improves the quality of service in software defined networks

Author Biographies

Yurii Kulakov, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Computer Engineering

Alla Kohan, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

PhD

Department of Computer-Aided Management and Data Processing Systems

Yevheniia Pavlenkova, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Department of Computer-Aided Management and Data Processing Systems

Nikol Pastrello, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Department of Computer-Aided Management and Data Processing Systems

Nikita Machekhin, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” Peremohy ave., 37, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03056

Department of Computer-Aided Management and Data Processing Systems

References

  1. Xia, W., Wen, Y., Foh, C. H., Niyato, D., Xie, H. (2015). A Survey on Software-Defined Networking. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 17 (1), 27–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2014.2330903
  2. Ahmed, A. M., Paulus, R. (2017). Congestion detection technique for multipath routing and load balancing in WSN. Wireless Networks, 23 (3), 881–888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1151-5
  3. He, J., Song, W. (2015). Achieving near-optimal traffic engineering in hybrid Software Defined Networks. 2015 IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ifipnetworking.2015.7145321
  4. Shu, Z., Wan, J., Lin, J., Wang, S., Li, D., Rho, S., Yang, C. (2016). Traffic engineering in software-defined networking: Measurement and management. IEEE Access, 4, 3246–3256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2016.2582748
  5. Wei, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, L., Leng, S. (2016). Energy-aware traffic engineering in hybrid SDN/IP backbone networks. Journal of Communications and Networks, 18 (4), 559–566. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/jcn.2016.000079
  6. Lin, S.-C., Wang, P., Luo, M. (2016). Control traffic balancing in software defined networks. Computer Networks, 106, 260–271. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2015.08.004
  7. Lin, S.-C., Akyildiz, I. F., Wang, P., Luo, M. (2016). QoS-Aware Adaptive Routing in Multi-layer Hierarchical Software Defined Networks: A Reinforcement Learning Approach. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Services Computing (SCC). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/scc.2016.12
  8. Kulakov, Yu. A., Kogan, A. V., Hrapov, V. M. (2017). The method of constructing traffic in the multipath routing. Visnyk NTUU «KPI» Informatyka, upravlinnia ta obchysliuvalna tekhnika, 65, 28–33.
  9. Kulakov, Y., Kopychko, S., Gromova, V. (2019). Organization of Network Data Centers Based on Software-Defined Networking. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 447–455. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91008-6_45
  10. Al-Fares, M., Radhakrishnan, S., Huang, N., Vahdat, A., Raghavan, B. (2010). Hedera: Dynamic Flow Scheduling for Data Center Networks. NSDI'10 Proceedings of the 7th USENIX conference on Networked systems design and implementation. San Jose, 19–34.
  11. Zhang, H., Guo, X., Yan, J., Liu, B., Shuai, Q. (2014). SDN-based ECMP algorithm for data center networks. 2014 IEEE Computers, Communications and IT Applications Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/comcomap.2014.7017162
  12. Chiang, S.-H., Kuo, J.-J., Shen, S.-H., Yang, D.-N., Chen, W.-T. (2018). Online Multicast Traffic Engineering for Software-Defined Networks. IEEE INFOCOM 2018 – IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/infocom.2018.8486290
  13. Jutila, M. (2017). Adaptive traffic management in heterogeneous communication networks. University of Oulu, 96.
  14. Trestian, R., Muntean, G.-M., Katrinis, K. (2013). MiceTrap: Scalable traffic engineering of datacenter mice flows using OpenFlow. IFIP/IEEE Int. Symp. on Integr. Netw. Managem. IM 2013. Ghent, 904–907.
  15. Qazi, Z. A., Lee, J., Jin, T., Bellala, G., Arndt, M., Noubir, G. (2013). Application-awareness in SDN. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43 (4), 487–488. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2534169.2491700
  16. Dinh, K. T., Kukliński, S., Kujawa, W., Ulaski, M. (2016). MSDN-TE: Multipath Based Traffic Engineering for SDN. Intelligent Information and Database Systems, 630–639. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49390-8_61
  17. Braun, W., Menth, M. (2015). Load-dependent flow splitting for traffic engineering in resilient OpenFlow networks. 2015 International Conference and Workshops on Networked Systems (NetSys). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/netsys.2015.7089060
  18. Kul'gin, M. (2000). Tekhnologii korporativnyh setey. Sankt-Peterburg, 704.
  19. Kulakov, Y., Kohan, A., Kopychko, S. (2020). Traffic Orchestration in Data Center Network Based on Software-Defined Networking Technology. Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education II, 228–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16621-2_21

Downloads

Published

2019-04-18

How to Cite

Kulakov, Y., Kohan, A., Pavlenkova, Y., Pastrello, N., & Machekhin, N. (2019). Traffic engineering in a software-defined network based on the decision-making method. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(9 (98), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.164686

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 9 (98) (2019): Information and controlling system

Section

Information and controlling system

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Yurii Kulakov, Alla Kohan, Yevheniia Pavlenkova, Nikol Pastrello, Nikita Machekhin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.